Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 17.5 kB
Pages: 4
Date: July 17, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 626 Words, 3,999 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/19681/39.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Federal Claims ( 17.5 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:05-cv-00281-NBF

Document 39

Filed 07/17/2007

Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

UNISYS CORPORATION,

) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ) THE UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________)

No. 05-281C (Judge Firestone)

DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN ENLARGEMENT OF TIME Pursuant to RCFC 6(b) and 6.1, defendant, the United States, respectfully requests an enlargement of nine calendar days (to and including August 15, 2007) of the time within which defendant may file its reply in support of Defendant's Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, dated January 12, 2007.1 Absent the requested enlargement, defendant would be required to file its reply on or before August 6, 2007. See Order dated April 17, 2007. This is defendant's first request for an enlargement of time for this purpose. On July 16, 2007, undersigned counsel for defendant left a voice mail message for Terry L. Albertson, Esq., counsel for plaintiff Unisys Corporation ("Unisys"), describing this motion, who later left a voice mail message stating that plaintiff would not oppose the motion.

As the Court is aware, the briefing schedule on this issue has been coordinated with the briefing schedule on the same issue in General Electric Co. v. United States, No. 99-172C. Defendant is also filing an unopposed motion in General Electric requesting that the Court grant the same enlargement of time for filing defendant's reply that defendant is requesting in this case.

1

Case 1:05-cv-00281-NBF

Document 39

Filed 07/17/2007

Page 2 of 4

The grounds for the motion are that parties to this action and the Court have recognized the benefits of coordinating the briefing schedule on the surplus transfer issue in this case with the briefing schedule on the same surplus transfer issue in the General Electric case. The Court previously established the same briefing schedule upon this issue in both cases, under which GE and Unisys would submit their response to defendant's cross-motion and reply in support of their motion for summary judgment on the same day (February 27, 2007), and defendant would submit its reply in both cases on the same day (March 27, 2007), which was later extended to August 6, 2007 by Order dated April 17, 2007. Defendant is requesting in General Electric the same nine-day enlargement of time that it is requesting in this case. In order to continue to provide that, as the Court previously directed, defendant's reply in each case would be due upon the same date, defendant respectfully requests that the Court enter an order enlarging the time within which defendant may file its reply in support of its cross-motion for partial summary judgment upon the surplus transfer issue in this case to August 15, 2007, the date that defendant has requested in the General Electric case. Respectfully submitted, PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General

s/ Jeanne E. Davidson JEANNE E. DAVIDSON Director

-2-

Case 1:05-cv-00281-NBF

Document 39

Filed 07/17/2007

Page 3 of 4

OF COUNSEL: STEPHEN R. DOOLEY Senior Trial Attorney (Supervisory) Defense Contract Management Agency 495 Summer Street Boston, MA 02210 Dated: July 17, 2007 s/ C. Coleman Bird C. COLEMAN BIRD Senior Trial Counsel Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice 1100 L Street, N.W. Attn: Classification Unit 8th Floor Washington, D.C. 20530 Telephone: 202.307.0453 Facsimile: 202.514.7965 Attorney for Defendant United States

-3-

Case 1:05-cv-00281-NBF

Document 39

Filed 07/17/2007

Page 4 of 4

CERTIFICATE OF FILING I hereby certify that on the 17th day of July, 2007, a copy of the foregoing Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time was filed electronically. I understand that notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court's system. s/ C. Coleman Bird