Free Stipulation - District Court of California - California

Case 3:08-cv-01219-CRB

Document 24

Filed 06/05/2008

Page 1 of 4

I I ALAN R. BRAYTON (Bar No. 73685)
-

BRAYTON PURCELL LLP

PETER B. FREDMAN'(B~~ 189097) No. II 222 Rush LandingSCOTT (Bar No. 225581 CHARLOTTE E. Road
-

i

'

Novato, CA 94948-6 169 Telephone: 415) 898-1555 Facsimile: i l l ) 898-1247 Email: pfie [email protected]

Attorneys for Plaintiff DAVID KECK and all persons similarly situated

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

I

I

DAVID KECK, individually and on behalf of all ) Case No. CV 08-1219 CRB others similarly situated, 1 ) STIPULATION TO AMEND Plaintiff, ) PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDE COMPLAINT TO SUBSTITUTE ) "TRG CUSTOMER SOLUTIONS, ) INC. d/b/a TELESPECTRUM" FO BANK OF AMERICA, a Delaware corporation; ) THE DOE DEFENDANT 1 CENTRAL STATES INDEMNITY CO. OF j OMAHA, a Nebraska Corporation; CSI 1 PROCESSING LLC, a Nebraska company; and 1 DOES 1-100, ) ) Dept.: 8 Defendants. ) Judge: The Hon. Charles R. Breyer

1

1

STIPULATION TO AMEND SA CASE NO. CV 08-1219 CP

Case 3:08-cv-01219-CRB

Document 24

Filed 06/05/2008

Page 2 of 4

2

name of the telemarketer defendants and thus designated the telemarketer defendants by the fictitious name of "DOES." Plaintiff has since discovered the true name of the telemarketer

3
4 5

Solutions, Inc. doing II defendant is TRG Customerpermits amendment bybusiness as Telespectrum. Federal Rules Procedure, the parties' II of CivilTherefore, inRule 15 with Rule 15, the parties herebywritten consent. I accordance stipulate to amend 6 11 I Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint by substituting "TRG Customer Solutions, Inc. d/b/a II 8 11 Telespectrum" as the true name for fictitious third party telemarketer defendants identified
7

9

10 Telespectrum" as a defendant and substitute the true name for the fictitious name wherever it 11

I
II

I

therein as "DOES". The parties stipulate to add "TRG Customer Solutions, Inc. d/b/a

II appears in the Second Amended Complaint.
Dated: June 5,2008

I

I
BRAYTON PURCELL LLP IS/ Peter B. Fredman Peter B. Fredman Attorneys for Plaintiff David Keck By:

18 Dated: June

I

.2008

SEVERSON & WERSON A Professional Corporation

24

1

Jan T. Chilton Attorneys for Defendant Bank of America, N.A. Dated: June ,2008 TOBIN & TOBIN

By: Paul E. Gaspari Attorneys for Defendant Central States Indemnity Co. of Omaha and CSI Processing LLC
2
STIPULATION TO AMEND SAC CASE NO. CV 08-1219 CRB

Case 3:08-cv-01219-CRB

Document 24

Filed 06/05/2008

Page 3 of 4

Upon the filing of the Second Amended Complaint, plaintiff was not aware of the trw ame of the telemarketer defendants and thus designated the telemarketer defendants by the ~ctitious name of "DOES." Plaintiff has since discovered the true name of the telemarketer efendant is TRG Customer Solutions, Inc. doing business as Telespectrum. Federal Rules f Civil Procedure, Rule 15 permits amendment by the parties' written consent. Therefore, in accordance with Rule 15, the parties hereby stipulate to amend 'laintiff s Second Amended Complaint by substituting "TRG Customer Solutions, Inc. d/b/a 'elespectrum" as the true name for fictitious third party telemarketer defendants identified herein as "DOES". The parties stipulate to add "TRG Customer Solutions, Inc. d/b/a 'elespectrum" as a defendant and substitute the true name for the fictitious name wherever i ppears in the Second Amended Complaint.

Iated: June 5,2008

BRAYTON PURCELL LLP Is/ Peter B. Fredman Peter B. Fredman Attorneys for Plaintiff David Keck
.

By:

Iated: June

,2008

SEVERSON & WERSON A Professional Corporation

\

By:

t.:fh

Jan T. Chilton Attorneys for Defendant Bank of America, N.k lated: June ,2008 TOBIN & TOBIN

By: Paul E. Gaspari Attorneys for Defendant Central States Indemnity Co. of Omaha and CSI Processing LLC
2 STIPULATION TO AMEND S t CASE NO. CV 08-1219 CI

Case 3:08-cv-01219-CRB

Document 24

Filed 06/05/2008

Page 4 of 4

Upoil tl~e filing of the Second Amended Complaint, plaintiff was not aware of the tn name of the telemarketer defendants and thus designated the telemarketer defendants by the fictitious name of "DOES." Plaintiff has since discovered the true name of the telemarketer defendant is TRG Customer Solutioils, Inc. doing business as Telespectrum. FederaI Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 15 permits amendment by the parties' written consent. Therefore, in accordance with Rule 15, the parties hereby stipulate to amend Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint by substituting "TRG Customer Solutions, Inc. d/b/ Telespectrum" as the true name for fictitious tlurd party teIemarketer defendants identified therein as "DOES". The parties stipulate to add "TRG Customer Solutions, Inc. d/b/a Telespectrum" as a defendant and substitute the true name for the fictitious name wherever appears in the Second Amended Complaint.

/ I Dated: June 5. 2008

BRAYTON PURCELL LLP By:
IS/Peter B. Fredman

Peter B. Fredman Attorneys for Plaintiff David Keck

Dated: June

,2008

SEVERSON & WERSON A ProfessionaI Corporation

By: __ ..
Dated: J & t d . 2008 . Jan T. Ckilton Attorneys for Defendant Bank of America, N.A.

lldenlnity Co. of Omaha and CSI Processing LLC
2
STlPULATlON TO AMEXD SAC CASE NO. CV 08-1219 CRB

Case 3:08-cv-01219-CRB

Document 24-2

Filed 06/05/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

BRAYTON PURCELL LLP ALAN R. BRAYTON (Bar No. 73685) PETER B. FREDMAN (Bar No. 189097) CHARLOTTE E. SCOTT (Bar No. 225581) 222 Rush Landing Road Novato, CA 94948-6169 Telephone: (415) 898-1555 Facsimile: (415) 898-1247 Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff DAVID KECK and all persons similarly situated

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

DAVID KECK, individually and on behalf of all ) ) others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) BANK OF AMERICA, a Delaware corporation; ) ) CENTRAL STATES INDEMNITY CO. OF ) OMAHA, a Nebraska Corporation; CSI ) PROCESSING LLC, a Nebraska company; and ) ) DOES 1-100, ) ) Defendants. ) ) )

Case No. CV 08-1219 CRB [PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT TO SUBSTITUTE "TRG CUSTOMER SOLUTIONS, INC. d/b/a TELESPECTRUM" FOR THE DOE DEFENDANT

Dept.: 8 Judge: The Hon. Charles R. Breyer _________________________________

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDED SAC CASE NO. CV 08-1219 CRB

Case 3:08-cv-01219-CRB

Document 24-2

Filed 06/05/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

In accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 15, and pursuant to the stipulation filed by the parties filed on June 5, 2008, Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint shall be amended to substitute "TRG Customer Solutions, Inc. d/b/a Telespectrum" for fictitious third party telemarketer defendants identified therein as "DOES". This amendment shall add "TRG Customer Solutions, Inc. d/b/a Telespectrum" as a defendant and substitutes the true name for the fictitious name wherever it appears in the Second Amended Complaint. Based on this amendment, a new Summons shall issue to TRG Customer Solutions, Inc. d/b/a Telespectrum. Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order with the Summons and Second Amended Complaint to TRG Customer Solutions, Inc. d/b/a Telespectrum.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:

, 2008

By: The Honorable Charles R. Breyer United States District Court Judge

2

[PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDED SAC CASE NO. CV 08-1219 CRB