Free Letter - District Court of California - California

Case 3:07-cv-02748-I\/IHP Document 150-9 Filed O3/26/2008 Page 1 of 2
1 RICHARD HARRINGTON (SBN 28099)
CHANDLER WOOD HARRINGTON & MAFFLY LLP
2 One Maritime Plaza, Fourth Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-3404
3 Telephone: 415 421 5484
Facsimile: 415 986 4874
4 Email: [email protected]
5 ROBERT CHARLES WARD (SBN 160824)
SHARTSIS F RIESE LLP
- 6 One Maritime Plaza, Eighteenth Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-3404
7 Telephone: 415 421 6500
Facsimile: 415 421 2922
8 Email: [email protected]
9 C. ANGELA DE LA HOUSAYE (SBN 144218)
BRENDAN J. DOOLEY (SBN 162880)
10 KARYNE T. GHANTOUS (SBN 191309)
DE LA HOUSAYE & ASSOCIATES, ALC
11 1655 N. Main Street, Suite 395
Walnut Creek, California 94596
12 Telephone: (925) 944-3300
Facsimile: (925) 944-3343
13 Email: angela(a>delahousavelaw.com
brenclangcDdelahousayelaw.com
14 karyneggtldelahousayelaw. com
15 Attorneys for Defendants
ANDREW VERITY AND CHRISTINA CHANG
16
17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
20
21 MARK LILLGE D/B/A CREATIVE ) Case No: C-07-02748 MHP
MARKETING CONCEPTS, )
22 ) [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
, Plantifi ) DEFENDANTS ANDREW VERITY AND
2J ) CHRISTINA CHANG’S MOTION TO
v_ ) COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO
24 ) DISCOVERY
25 ANDREW VERITY AND CHRISTINA CHANG,) _
) Date: April 23, 2008
_ ) Time: 3:00 p.m.
26 Defendants ) Dept: Courtroom 15, 18th Floor
27 Judge; Hon. Marilyn H. Patel
28 Complaint Filed: May 25, 2007
Trial Date: None Set

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS ANDREW VERITY AND CHRISTINA CHANG’S MOTION TO
COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO DISCOVERY

Case 3:07-cv—O2748-I\/IHP Document 150-9 Filed O3/26/2008 Page 2 of 2
1 On April 23, 2008, Defendants Andrew Verity and Christina Chang’s Motion to Compel Further
2 Responses to Discovery from the Plaintiff MARK LILLGE D/B/A CREATIVE MARKETING
3 CONCEPTS came on before me for hearing. Defendants Andrew Verity and Christina Chang were
4 represented by Brendan J. Dooley of De La Housaye & Associates, A Law Corporation. Plaintiff Mark
5 Lillge was represented by Ian Boyd of Harvey Siskind LLP.
6 The Court, having considered the memoranda of points and authorities, declarations, exhibits,
7 and other documents presented to the Court for the motion, and after full consideration of counsels’ oral
8 argument,
9 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
10 1. Plaintiff shall, within seven days, identify the trade secrets he claims were
11 misappropriated with reasonable particularity, including but not limited to, the specific facts that make
12 up each and every claimed trade secret. Plaintiff may not refer the Defendants to documents produced
13 in discovery as the means to obtain such facts, but must provide the specific information pursuant to
14 California Code of Civil Procedure §2019.210.
15 2. Defendants shall be permitted to depose Plaintiff regarding the facts and circumstances
16 surrounding Defendant Verity’s termination from CMC, including, but not limited to the specific topics
17 that Plaintiff refused to provide answers to during his deposition on June 6, 2007.
18 3. Plaintiff shall pay Defendants’ legal fees and costs incurred as part of this motion in the
19 following amount $ .
20 IT IS SO ORDERED.
2 1 Dated:
22
HON. MARILYN HALL PATEL
23 United States District Judge
24
25
26
27
28
MHP
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS ANDREW VERITY AND CHRISTINA CHANG’S MOTYNW
COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO DISCOVERY

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 150-9

Filed 03/26/2008

Page 1 of 2

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 150-9

Filed 03/26/2008

Page 2 of 2