Free Motion to Expedite - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 Robert M. Cook (SBN 002628)
THE LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT M. COOK
2 Missouri Commons —- Suite 185
1440 E. Missouri Avenue
3 Phoenix, Arizona 85014
4 acsimi ez —
P‘€*’*"t"€‘ é€8§l§§§‘8§§§
E·mai1: [email protected]
S Attorney for Plaintiff
6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
7
8 ROBERT A. CUEVAS, Case No: CIV04-0476-PHX—PGR
9 Plaintiff,
vs.
10 John Miranda, Former Chief of Police, MOTION FOR EXPEDITED RULING
X U Cit%of San Luis, Arizona; CITY OF ON MOTION FOR RULE 54(b)
o SA LUIS; Ci of San Luis Police CERTIFICATION
W . .
8 I2 Department; Chief of Police now Eddie
S tt Bejarano with the Ci of San Luis Police
® ty
E g, X 13 Department; Alex Ruiz, City
tu g ag Administrator for the CRE of San Luis,
S ‘f’ § ( 14 Arizona; Arizona; and D PARTMENT
E g gg OF HOMELAND SECURITY; and
o gg) g 15 John A. Schwamm, _Sr., then acting Port
Q g 5 X Director, - now Assistant Customs
E I; § E 16 Director for United States Customs
5 § rg gerviccé in San Iguis, Ariz1\o[nai]U1?ited
Q tates ustoms erviceg IC ae
E 5 17 Freeman, Port Director for United States
u, 18 Customs Service in San Luis, Arizona;
{E lgobert 'SCi'1I%0C({€3Y,'A§1Il§1H1StfgIV€
upervisor or nite tates ustoms
19 Service in San Luis, Arizona, Department
20 of Homeland Security - Divi_sion .S.
Customs and Border Protection in
21 Tucson, Arizona; Donna De La Torres,
Director, Field Operations Arizona
22 Customs Managlement Center for the
Department of omeland Security —
23 Division U.S. Customs and Border
Protection in Tucson, Arizona,
24 Defendants.
25
26
27 Plaintiff Robert A. Cuevas, by and through his undersigned attomey, hereby moves
Z8 Page -1 -
ase 2:O4—cv—OO476—PGR Document 39 Filed O1/22/2007 Page 1 of 2

1 this Court for an expedited ruling on his Motion for Rule 54(b) Certification of its March
2 24, 2005 Order and Judgment, dismissing, for lack of jurisdiction, the federal defendants
3 in this matter. Plaintiff seeks to maintain his appeal before the Court of Appeals for the
4 Ninth Circuit, in which oral argument is set for February 16, 2007. Plaintiff advises the
5 court that he has advised the appellate court of what he seeks from the instant court, in
6 addition to seeking from the appellate court a limited remand for the purpose of obtaining
7 Rule 54(b) certification.
8
9 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 22"° day of January, 2007.
10 THE LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT M. COOK, PLLC
>c 11
8
9 12 By /s/ Robert McConnell C00/c, Sr.
E § Robert McConnell Cook, Sr.
_% lg _ g 13 Attorney for P/aintgf
§ 14 The foregoing ECF this 22“d day
5 § S E ofJanuary, 2 07; and
2 °r7> < [5
g § ,52 g` Sent via facsimile and mail this 22"d day
E §§§ 16 ofJanuary, 2007:
O g ¤~
E 5 17 Richard G. Patrick
5 Assistant U.S. Attorney
;J 18 Two Renaissance Square
*‘ 40 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1200
19 Phoenix, AZ 85004-4408
Facsimile: (602) 514-7760
20
21
/s/ Vicki L. Ru/1
22
23
24
25
26
27
Z8 Page —2·
ase 2:O4—cv—OO476—PGR Document 39 Filed O1/22/2007 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-00476-PGR

Document 39

Filed 01/22/2007

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-00476-PGR

Document 39

Filed 01/22/2007

Page 2 of 2