Free Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

. Michael G. Ackerman, in A • o I ‘
Ackerman , Kevorkian & Mesh _‘ I
2391 The Alameda, Suite 100 ·
Santa Clara, CA 95050 ·
(408_)261-5800 ¥ , _
Appearing FOI ’ Rpnald unrreo stares DISTRICT count ` . T
Craig Fish A Law CMP- ronrue ms1·a1c·rorA121zonA 4
p D -Ro-held Craig Fish, All Law I
h Corpqratiozfi V )
Plaintitl’(s)/Petitioner(s), ) ~
‘ - » _ ) CASE N0= crv·—0s-e7-pnx4snn »
vs. Thomas G. Watkins III, an) , D '
1¤diVld¤—’1l _ and Skyl ine ) " Application ot Attorney For Admission To Practice ‘
Manufacturing IPC · ) Pro Hac Vice Pursuant to LRCIV 83.1 (b)(3) , _
Detendanqstggespondentist p ) _ .
Nti'l‘I6E: Pleasasulmitdn $100 Ins williyaurapéualiun. _- p
I, mj gb E E ] gg, pqkaman , hereby apply to the Court under LRCIv I.l(b)(3) for pro hac
vice admission to appear and practice ln this action on behalf ot ponald ‘ Cfaj-Q Fish i A Law C01'@I'6iT-I-OD
CITY AND stare or PRINCIPAL·RESIDEl~ICE: San. Jose , * Cal ifornia
FIRM NAME; -. · Ackerman ,- itvorkian a Mash ` A · _
ADDRESS: ~ 239 1 The gi], ggpega , 1 l ·‘ * . SUITE: 3 QQ ·
‘ CITY: · A A -n §g,nt;a," Q],. 3,33 ` _ l STATE: gp ZIP: g5g5g
FIRM/BUSINESS PHONE (4 08 ·)
FIRMFAXPHONE:(4g9 2 $3-5ggg I E-MAILADDRESS: ` ' _
- I am admitted to practice before the following courts. (attach additional sheets if necessary) - I
, TITLE OF COURT l DATE OF ADMISSION IN GOOD STANDING
_ - ‘ circle)
Supreme Court State of CA- I Dec , 19 QZ 5 l I ® / No* _
U . S . District Court No . Dist. of C2;. Q gg , 12 25 @ / No" ‘
U.S.Court :0f Appeals 9th Cir'. · gprjj,". 3993 _ / N9*
(An Original Certificate of Good Standing from a EDERAL BAR tn which an applicant has been admitted dated no more than 45 days prior to
submission of this application is required.) ·
I have concurrently, or within l year of this application, made pro frac vice applications to this Court in the following actions (attach
additional sheets if necessary): `
OQSENUMBER TITLE OF AC TION DATE GRANTED OR DEWED*

I "‘EXPI.AIN:

ALL APPLICANTS A9. REQUIRED TO ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS.
It you answer YES to either ofthe following questions, please explain all circumstances on a separate page.
` Are you currently the subject of a disciplinary investigation or proceeding by any Bar or- Court? _ Y
Have you ever been dlsbarred from practice in any Court? Y I
I declare under penalty of per_|ury‘that the foregoing ts true t; thatl am not = resided »_.:- nor am I regularly employed,
engaged in business, professional or other activities ln t ¢ e · · · = and ·¢» V rrentty suspended, dlsbarred or
subject to disciplinary proceedings in any court. I ha ;» -=·• = - · will ·: tor Protessional Conduct.
Date ` _` ‘ ature of.Appl' nt t ·‘
li@|im@Il1l# ? ICO/$357 A - _ om. caros)
Case 2tO3—cv—OOO67—SI\/II\/I Document 96 Filed O9/21_/2005 Page 1 of 4

‘ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ` T
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA .
T Ronald Craig Fish , A Law I _
· Corporation I ) CASE NO- - CIV-0 3 -·g6 73PHX-·SMM
PlaintiH(s)/Petitioner(s), ) . .
T A ) A ORDER FOR ADMISSION OF _
. vs. I ) ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE
Thomas G. Watkins III , an . ) .
individual and Sky]. ine ) J `
Manufacturing Inc. . _ · ) `- .
Defendanti s |fBgsm_ggLqgt§ s | J
Based upon the motion- of for admission to practice pro H
- hac vice in this action on behalf of and in accordancelwith
I LRCiv 83.1(b)(3) ofthe Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District .
of Arizona, ITIS HEREBY ORDERED that: I _
i . . ‘ .
i /_/ the motion of attorney for admission to practice pro hac vice is granted. _
/__/ the motion of attorney. for admission to practice pro hac vice is denied and the ·
admission fee ordered rettuned. - n
Dated this · day of , 20__. ‘ H
UNITED STATES DISTRICT! MAGISTRATE
A IUDGE - _
n T (nw. arcs)
Case 2:O3—cv—OOO67-SIVIIVI Document 96 Filed O9/21/2005 Page 2 of 4

.., THE p
'* · iso nowaizn srnnsr
STAT E BAR saw rmncrsco, cauroams sneaisss
t»_ _r~ OF CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE(415) sssezoou
September 14, 2005
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
This is to certify that according to the records ofthe State Bar, MICHAEL GEORGE
ACKERMAN was admitted to the practice of law in this state by the Supreme Court
of California on December IS, 1975; and has been since that date, and is at date
hereof, an ACTIVE member of the State Bar of California; that the public record
I states that information has been provided pursuant to Business and Professions Code
I section 6086.l(c); and that no recommendation for discipline for professional or
l other misconduct has ever been made by the Board of Governors or a Disciplinary
l Board to the Supreme Court ofthe State of California. p
I
l
n E? i` I " TC I
THE_SrTi¤E*I‘B BAR OF CALIFORNIA
Waffa "
Custodian of Membership Records
Case 2:O3—cv—OOO67-SIVIIVI Document 96 Filed O9/21/2005 Page 3 of 4

°
§` e gg
Q g\ -


Q
AEA Y
§
SS fg gg
Q é §§§&
§ i_w§&§

Case 2:03-cv-00067-SMM

Document 96

Filed 09/21/2005

Page 1 of 4

Case 2:03-cv-00067-SMM

Document 96

Filed 09/21/2005

Page 2 of 4

Case 2:03-cv-00067-SMM

Document 96

Filed 09/21/2005

Page 3 of 4

Case 2:03-cv-00067-SMM

Document 96

Filed 09/21/2005

Page 4 of 4