Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

i ` Case 3:00-cv-01115-PCD Document 89 Filed 05/11/2006 Page10f3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
SUZANNE MERSEREAU SEARLES, Plaintiff Case No. 2 90cv626(PCD)
Case No. 3 9?cv2601(PCD)
V' Case No. OOcv1115(PCD)
West Hartford Board of Education, gt
al. Defendants . +_
MOTION QQR EXTENSION QQ TlM§
Plaintiff prg gg lfg herein moves for an ext nsion of time
in which to file a Motion for Reconsideration of he·May l, 2006
ruling denying her Motion to Reopen and For Relie from fudgment,
her Motion to Appoint Counsel, and her Motion to rooeed lg
Forma Pauperis. Said ruling did not arrive at Pl intiff's home
until Saturday, May 6, 2006. Not until today, Ma 9, 2006 did
United States District Court Rules of Civil Proce ure arrive
at her home as supplied by the state law library. Rule 7;}
"Motion Procedures" includes “(b) Motions for Ext nsion of Time"
and "(0)Motions for Reconsideration.“
In all three of the aforementioned cases thi court failed
to rule judioiously inclusive gl gll exhibits ro ative gf
Defendant fraud. Furthermore F.R.C.P. 60(b)(6) h s been argued
and pleaded by Plaintiff for sixteen years and co nting. The
court erroneously quotes Rule 60(b) with omission —egregious
omission — of the tenets of Rule 60(b)(6). The c urt has thrice
ruled for appointment of counsel for this Plainti f but has
never honored its word.
Finally, the last two (2) sentences of Judge Dorsey's
ruling of May 1, 2006, are fraudulent in their en irety:
To avoid confusion, the present moti n
is an attempt to relitigate matters lready
adjudicated. Plaintiff is advised t
consider this warning before filing ny
further documents in support of reli igating
issues that have already been ad`udi ated.---
(e _hasis added)
adjudication is defined in Black'; lgg Dictionary as follows:
The formal giving or pronouncing a j dg-
I ment or decree in a cause...It impli s a
hearing by a court, after notice, of
legal evidence on the factual issue(")
-1-
ffjjijijjiTieiT.llll____l__g_;;;;;;iiijiiee¤sssEssen;isa eseseseeeeeee—12: -.-
- I3;;;*** ease—ei?M rr —— :»#rxrI—-seseeeseaseaeaeseeseegeesaaessassassess;
fjjijiijijieiiill.l_il____l_g és; eaaasaeeeseTeeLI- 5-.

‘ ` Case 3:00-cv-01115-PCD Document 89 Filed 05/11/2006 Page 2 of 3 {
involved. The equivalent of a -
D “determination.“ And contemplates E
‘ that the claims of all the parties
thereto have been considered and
set at rest....
Never in sixteen years and counting has this Plaint ff been
granted "g hearing gy jgg court"; never ggg "legal =vidence
gg ggg factual issues involved" gg even ggg gg jgg hree cases
gggg litigated; never ggyg Plaintiff'g claims "gggg considered
ggg gg; gg gggg." The court's diction of “relitiga ing issues“ E
is erroneous gg gggg as is the court's caveat/“warn ng" re-
same. (emphasis added)
For the aforementioned reasons and many others Plaintiff
files this Motion For Extension Of Time. She has t·is day
phoned all twelve (12) opposing counsel regarding t·is Motion.
Attorney McNamara stated,“ I'm going to object.“ A torney
Rosenberg stated that he must consult his client. zone of the
others listed on the Certification page answered, b=t Plaintiff _
left her message and phone number on each one's voi·e mail.
·gg;Ectful y sgggiiz il N
a;aHL;i ~
Suzannb Melsereau Searles,
ggg gg i- forma pauperis I
¤
l
\
. ; _2_ {
i;I3;i;;;;i;;;;i;I3;i;;;;i;;;ii;iiii;iiP_ii_*ij`_Pijl_iifi_"T?_T?T?`T?T?`T?T?`T?T?`??T?7

_ ` § Case 3:00-cv-01115-PCD Document 89` Filed 05/11/2006 Page3of3 i
r CERTIFICATION ;
I _ I
Plaintiff hereby certifies that a copy of thi motion
was this day. 9 May 2006, mailed prepaid to each o the
following:
West Hartford Corporation Counsel. R¤b€Pt E· Y UUE?
50 south main street N¤b1 West Hartford, ow 06107 1 C0 Connor t
SS •
Karsten and D°m¤¤ Harzltiggg, 0 0611LI·-1067
A 29 SOM Main Sv¤¤“¤ James M Ta ta
'[ l
Nest HartfOrd’ CT 06107 0'Brien, Ta ki, Tanzer & Young
Rosenberg and Rosenberg Cityplace I
920 Farmington Avenue Hartford, C 06103-3M02
West Hartford, CT 06107
Peter R. Blum, Esq.
· 1 Linden Place—Apt. 307
Hartford, CT 06106
Martin A. Gould, Esq.
Gould, Killian, and Wynne
280 Trumbull Street =
Hartford, CT 06103
Timothy McNamara, Esq.
_ 102 Oak Street
Hartford, CT 06106 . »
Edward J. Fredericks, M.D. (EL
85 Seymour Street ‘ ‘
HartfOrd’ CT 06103 Suzann M Searles
Igor I. Sikorsky, Jr., Esq.
121 Perry Street
Unionville. CT 06085 (
Garie J. Mulcahey
Bai, Pollack, Hlueweiss, &
Mulcahey
One Corporate Drive
Shelton, CT 06M8¤
Mark J. Sommaruga, Michael Peter McKeon,
Thomas N. Sullivan
Sullivan, Schoen, Campane, & Connon=
6M6 Prospect Ave.
Hartford, CT 06105
-3- N