Free Memorandum in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 69.7 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 302 Words, 1,946 Characters
Page Size: 614 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/9756/86-4.pdf

Download Memorandum in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Connecticut ( 69.7 kB)


Preview Memorandum in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:00-cv-01115-PCD Document 86-4 Filed O2/14/2006 Page 1 of 2
EXHIBIT C

Case 3:00-cv-01115-PCD Document 86-4 Filed 02/14/2006 Pa@et2 of Eonnecticut
COMMISSION ON HUMAN RICHTS AND OPPORTUNITIES
@5; 21 Grand Street, Hartford, CT 06106 (860) 5413400 FAX (860) 246-5419
gg; Toll Free in Connecticut I-800-477-5737 www.state.ct.us/chro
&.§&¤= F TDD (860)54I 3459
February 10, 2005 CERTIFIED MAIL # 7099 3400 0009 0144 8345
Ms. Suzanne M. Searles
45 Whispering Pines
Avon, CT 06001
RE: Searles v. West Hartford Board of Education; CHRO # 0010385
Dear Ms. Searles:
I am writing in response to your letter of August 25, 2004, addressed to Mr.
Hamisi Ingram, Executive Director of this agency. In your letter, you request that
this complaint be reopened by the Commission.
In response to your request, the file in this complaint has been reviewed. On
September 5, 2000, this complaint was dismissed by the Commission. You
requested reconsideration of the dismissal; that request was denied on
September 10, 2001. That denial of reconsideration was the Commission’s final
decision on your complaint.
Pursuant to Regulations of State Agencies Section 46a—54-71a(e)(2), the
Commission cannot reopen a matter when a request to do so is made more than
two years after the date of the Commission’s final decision. The final decision in
this matter —- the denial of reconsideration —— was, as indicated above, on
September 10, 2001. Your request to reopen is dated August 25, 2004, almost
three years after the tinal decision. Therefore, the Commission is without
authority to reopen this complaint. Thank you for your attention.
Sincerely,
...- ·~· 7
1** ( rr
_ a§t¤m;1 P. Peen
....., . .... .... ...... . ,,.. ....... ..... .... ......
. c: R.`H`amisi_;_In,gram, Executive Director
Jil Attorney James? M.Sconzo
Safeguarding Civil Rights in Connecticut i