;_“_"“““ *··Y·····—··-————-
. ._ V · 6* Case 3:00-cv-00835-CFD Document 375 Filed O4/30/2004 Page bm2{mg55,...P6( I
\p UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT y
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Q I Q
’lllillIiIPillu Aqim _
·:·$"rr·1@TCQlil·¤l
`?`“!"";Y; ‘I'i`I`iiii3· C I-
INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B. ` .
Plaintiff IVIL. IACTION NO.
:00CIl835 (CFD)
V. I
MOSTAFA REYAD AND WAFA REYAD I
Defendants
DATE: APRIL 14, 2004 I
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISSOLVE THE PREJUDQI MENT REMEDY I
I i
Defendant II/Iostafa Reyad and Wafa Reyad hereby respectf¤.IIIIy move this Court, `
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. R 4(n) to Dissolve the PrejudgmeI1t Remedy as
practicable as possible. Defendant’s suffered for almost four I(4) years, from
I I
an unauthorized prejudgment attachment which had the effect of permanent I
injunction. I I
I I
CONCLUSION I I
The Honorable Court should Order Dissolving the prejudgment remedy as a I
0 Q I
‘ tg matteruof law. I
**2 __ _ ‘—~=..f i
. .,.| _ *»· t.r_¢“i;},»',` a ;, I I
E 2 ii U6-? I I
Q ¤a °"0r·
S ri I3 Q Q? ddl? WJ] I I
.2 I: gg e' yi I
‘· 'E· W .. d
§ R 1 I I
a z ·a ¤ I
Q U D <2• I I
I I