Free Order on Motion for Leave to Appeal - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I-——_“’—K —· a__
f ©rCase 3:00-cv-00835-CFD Document 360 Filed 03/31/2004 Page 1 ®@}lCV?$$",,,_Cg_,(
W UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT . ig
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT I il I a III. I
I
. ZUQH I~iIIi`l E'.! ii? ?> Zi
t ‘ in T I, Z_ tI.iIi_i,ii»,rlw i
y I It liiiii. [Ji'.
* INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B.
_. olly `CQ _ Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION NO. ,
Ci! 3ZOOCV835 (CFD)
gy V_
*9;: s ii) ·.i" »
<"`\ ifi, N1 `C; i
I I Q}?-·»MOSgl;2\FA, REYAD AND WAFA REYAD y
AEM {ii Defendants I
\ "" ` DATE: MARCH 24, 2004 i
E DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATION AND LEA VE TO APPEAL I
•,_, Defendant ll/lostafa Reyad hereby moves this Court to issue a certification to the i
E Second Circuit for the determination of liability over Defendant’s defense
\° disputing Plaintiffs right to maintain this action, also Defendants seeks leave to
:Q_ Appeal. Defendant relies on the authority of The House Committee on the
E Judiciary proposed section 1292(b) listed several types of cases lt thought
}<§ appropriate for interlocutory appeals.
On the hearing held in this Court on March 23, 2004. The Honorable Court did
not Rule on Defendant's Mostafa Reyad’s motion to Dismiss dated December 3,
2003 (Doc # 311), in which Defendants alleges Plaintiffs lack of capacity to
maintain an action; pursuant to the said authority it is immediate appealable.
I
_____________l