Free Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

—· ' ‘ Case 3:00-cv-OO835€@*D Document 354 Filed O3/3Q-@004 m "" m'°\
Q`E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT _
W DISTRICT or connecticut F I L E D I
ZIIII} DEC IPI I3 3=2'I
U.S. DISTRICT COURT I
_.,.i.._;_;___ HARTFIIIIIJ, ct I
INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B. . I
Plaintiff IVIL ACTION NO.
P, l 3:00CV835 (CFD)
Q I-ii?
II -__A y V,
ICI L `~
;ii1E;;i.‘M0§$A1¤A?IzEvAD AND WAFA REYAD
_ Defendants
qq :::I§ EE. · I DATE: DECEMBER 18, 2003 I
g so
O n
II
g` DEFENDANT MOSTAFA REYAD’S MOTION TO GRANT MOTION TO
·_;__·* ‘ ‘ DISMISS AND SECOND MOTION IN LIMINE
*"" D.;
.·~ 5 e
` ,::15 {
as I
g {EI Defendant Mostafa Reyad respectfully moves this Court to Grant Defendant Mostafa
.z» = '
IZA
Q Q Reyad’s motion to Dismiss dated December 3, 2003; (Doc # 311) and to Grant Defendant I
Mostafa Reyad’s second motion in limine dated November 24, 2003 @3oc # 308).
Plaintiff is in default. Plaintiff tiled Plaintiffs consolidated opposition to Defendants’ I
pre-trial motions dated December 15, 2003 (Doc # 316) is a mere opposition; furtherly
Plaintiff p. 3-4 requests that it be permitted to file legal memorandum in opposition to I
Defendants’ motions twenty-one days following the Court’s determination that it deems
I
such a response necessary. Plaintiff is represented by two attorneys; their conduct is
contrary to the Rules of this Court. Plaintiffs request should be denied pursuant to the
Rules of this Court. Plaintiff does not have legal defense, and the Court should announce
I
that; Plaintiff in default. It is a good cause to Grant this motion; Grant Defendant Mostafa
I I
I
I
—-mm»m·A»+»..