Free Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

._ _ l· , Case 3:00-cv-008C€§CFD Document 359 Filed 0365 /2004 Pag@(]>©li/‘Y5$-r"’°"'I'°`I’*`
Q UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I
7j>\. DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT IF l L E D
Zllllm MAR lb P I: ln
Il.$.I[}l$3TRlCT COURT I
l··l!>.l‘i`i“F0ltm, gr I
INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B. , J
Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION NO.
3:00CV835 (CFD)
V.
MOSTAFA REYAD AND WAFA REYAD
Defendants ,
V DATE: MARCH 16, 2004
¥···` l
1;,5 _ cri
g vi DEFENDANTS’ RENEWAL MOTION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
E tj .__ DISMISS PURSUANT TO RULE 12|b)|6) -
P .2:% I
§ Defendants Mostafa Reyad and Wafa Reyad respectfully move Ithis Court to
é :::.1 [__; Renew their priorly filed "Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule I
rn 9;
` §§§;~·";?£ 12(b)(6) dated January 14, 2004 (Doc # 325), that motion is pending before the
E? Q tr?
Court. Defendants Renewal founded on evidence obtained among the exhibits of I
the Joint Trial Memorandum, received by Defendants on March 9, 2004. It is on
and betyyeen March 9-11, 2004, Plaintiff and Defendants exchanged the actual
Q <.
Uma exfrlbitslg IPlaintiff is claiming damages had been litigated and dismissed; Neither I
..;:rr.·.$ Om i_...;. 1 `
the-parties_n`or their privies are allowed to call the dismissed allegation, to have it
J.; ff] __..· t_ I ?_
triegébver] again at any time. It is demonstrated more fully in the Iaccompanled
Mei%:>randIum of Law in support of this Motion.
I
I I I