Free Motion for Conference - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

--—————-——- -————-—..—..—..-.......l.;....._......—..Y._.........._..__,_ .._..._._________
I Case 3:00-cv-00339-RNC Document 132 Filed 05/03/2006 Page 1 of 3
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT " I t' I I
I DISTR CT OF CONNECTICUT ~
I Zllllb l·lAY --3 A l0= 52 I
I *9:*·k·k*·k7:**·k**·k*·k**·k1:***·k*****·k**·k*******·I\·****1:*
THOMAS O’CONNOR * CIVIL ACTION NO.:»;3;g0;rCVI‘33§?r(RNC)
Plaintiff, ; 0 ` I
V. : I
LYNNE B. PIERSON, etal. I * I
**BS>I·f9E:5¢‘·Ig¢§·I!}¢'·!:\·§;¢********9:***·i¢·k*·k·k******sI·*****;¢ 2,
I
PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST OR A RULE 16 STATUS COINFERENCE
The plaintiff requests that the court schedule a Rule 16 status conference as
soon as possible. This is a six—yearIoId case and it is currently stalled in a procedural
morass. The plaintiff requests the cbnference in order to sort out through the issues I
and to make a plan for adjudication bs soon as possible. I
On November 10, 2005 the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. remanded this case
back to the District Court. On November 30, 2005, the court referred this matter to
Magistrate Judge Smith for a settlement conference. The settlement conference was
held on February 22, 2006. Prior to the settlement conference, on January 17, 2006,
the defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, which they later were forced to
I I
admit was done in contravention of the court’s procedure for filing dispositive motions. I
On March 2, 2006 the court referredthe pre-filing conference to Magistrate Judge
I
Smith, but on April 12, 2006 the court withdrew that referral.
The plaintiff is seeking to determine whether or not there will be a summary I
judgment motion. If a summaryjudgment motion is going to be entertained, the plaintiff
is seeking 1) a schedule for filing and responding to the motion; and 2) a trial date in the I
event the motion is denied. lf the suInmary judgment is not going to be entertained, the I

l ~————-——-—-—-————·————————-——·—-—-—--·-——i-.—....-........... ............J._.........____...... _.
i Case 3:00—cv-0033$%l§NC Document 132 Filed 05/03€006 Page 2 of 3
` l
plaintiff is seeking a trial date. N
l
THE PLAINTIFF,
/ r
Leon M_. Rosenblatt
Law Offices of Leon l\/l. Rosenblatt
10 N. Main Street
F West Hartford, CT 06107
(860) 523-8066 r
Federal Bar No. ct 000284
l
F l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l

Case 3:00-cv-0033Q·RNC Document 132 Filed 05/03/2006 Page 3 of 3
» \_,./ \_f,.}
· l
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that a copy ofthe foregoing was mailed, postage prepaid, on this
the 2nd day of May, 2006 to: I
Attorney Michael J. Rose
Attorney Alexandra Voccio
Howd & Ludorf 5
65 Wethersfield Ave.
Hartford, CT 06114
I Leon M. Rosenblatt — i
l
l
l
3
I l
· ·······~··—· *t""*'*T"""*'*';"" ’*"'**“""""" "" """"°`t'T""""*"""""""'—`i"\