Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I _ Case 3:03-cv-00571-SRU Document 26 Filed O1/29/2004 Paigg ‘IJ$]lm€U"“€-
1 °
i UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
l DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT (
E · (Bridgeport) ‘
l
JANE DOE, JR. : JMC,
l ppa JANE DOE, SR., : Case No. 3:03 CV 571 (SRU) I
: 3:01 CV 2298 (SRU) ;
I , {
i CITY OF WATERBURY, ET AL : Jan L 2004
l ‘””’
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION gl? TIME .
The plaintilf herein, by and through the undersigned, moves that the deadline for her to
tile her memorandum in rebuttal to that of the proposed intervener be extended four business
days until Monday, February 2, 2004. The proposed intervener was supposed to have tiled its
memorandum on or before Monday, January 12, 2004. However, eo-counsel, Atty. Gerald L.
\ Harmon, did not receive his copy ofthe proposed intervener’s January 16, 2004 memorandum {
Q until Saturday, January 17, 2004. Further, the undersigned has yet to receive his copy {rom g
'U
\ the proposed intervener as of this writing. The plaintift’s deadline for rebuttal memorandum
‘\\` was to be Monday, January 26"‘, 2004. Additional time is needed to compensate for the
l
` E proposed intervener not meeting its deadline. N
The undersigned hs notified all ofthe offices ofthe counsel of record of this motion E
I ; ·f _` buys of time, the undersigned has not heard from other counsel with respect to their
nag ·~ _..
E R E op§ionsgf[fhis is the plaintiff s first such request with respect to this memorandum. p
{ if {YE s.- s=
—”- fi me te
E r/>‘ ‘ "'*‘·· ;--q in .. E
S "‘ <¤‘> fm 4;, . J it P?
- raw __-· ¤ - re z
sy ··-. ¤ $5 E.-l?é?§$$Y l
Q
l
I
l
l