Free Other Notice - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 60.6 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 568 Words, 3,688 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/43585/53-2.pdf

Download Other Notice - District Court of Arizona ( 60.6 kB)


Preview Other Notice - District Court of Arizona
l TERRY GODDARD
Attomey General
`
CATHERINE M. BOHLAND
3 Assistant Attomey General
State Bar N0. 022124
4 1275 W. Washington
Phoenix, Arizona 85007-2997
5 Telephone: (602) 542-4951
Fax: (602) 542-7670
6 -i
Attorneys For Defendants
7
8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
g FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
10
1 1 Sheldon Walker, No: CV04-0691-PHX—MHM (LOA)
12 Plaintiff, DEF ENDAN'I`S’ REQUEST TO STAY
REPLY DEADLINE
13 V-
(EXPEDITED RULING REQUESTED)
14 Dora Schriro, et al.,
1 5 Defendants;
16
17 , .
Defendantsl, through undersigned counsel, move the Court to stay the deadline for
1 8 .
Defendants’ to Reply in Support of their Motion for Summary Judgment pending the
19 . . .
Court’s ruling on Defendants’ Motion to Strike (Dkt. 47). This motion is supported by
20
good cause and is not made to cause undue delay.
21 .
Defendants Reply in Support of their Motion for Summary Judgment IS due on May
22 . . . .
2, 2006. However, on April 14, 2006, Defendant’s tiled a Motion to Strike Pla1nt1ff’s
23 .
Response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment/Cross Motion for Summary
24 ’
Judgment (Dkt. 43) and Supporting Statement of Facts (Dkt. 44). Defendants request that
25
26 L””””"”_”“"“ i_
‘ Dora Schriro, Conrad Luna and Barbara Shearer.
C se 2:O4—cv—OO691—I\/IHI\/I—LOA Document 53-2 Filed 05/O3/2006 Page1 0f3

1 the Court stay the Reply deadline until a ruling is made as to Defendants’ Motion to Strike
2 (Dkr. 47).
3 In the interest of judicial economy, the Defendants move for an expedited ruling on
4 the Motion to Strike pending before this Court. Defendants seek to limit the amount of
5 needless expenditures and avoid increased costs. Therefore, Defendants respectfully
6 request the Court stay the Reply deadline pending this Court’s ruling on the Motion to
7 Strike (Dkt. 47).
8 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this lst day of May, 2006.
9 TERRY GODDARD
10 Attorney General
l l
s/Catherine M. Bohland
12 Catherine M. Bohland
Assistant Attornefy General
13 Attorneys for De endants
14
15
Original e-filed this lst day
16 ar May, 2006, with:
17 Clerk of the Court
United States District Court ,
18 District of Arizona
401 West Washington Street, SPC 1
19 Phoenix, AZ 85003-2118
20 Copy mailed the same date to:
21 Sheldon Walker, #102833
ASPC—1§_yman-SMUII
22 Post Of ice Box 3400
Florence AZ 85232
23
24 s/A. Palumbo
25 Legal Secretary to Catherine M. Bohland
10804-0455/RSK:G
26 #95 8467
n C se 2:04-cv-00691-IVIHIVI-LOA Document 53-2 Filed 05/O3/2006 Page 2 of 3

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2 n OR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
3
4 Sheldon Walker, No: CVO4—0691-PHX-MHM (LOA)
5 Plaintiff, ORDER
6 v. -
7 Dora Schriro, et al.,
8 Defendants.
9
10
H The Court havingiconsidered Defendants’ motion to stay the Reply deadline and
12 Petitioner’s response, and finding good cause:
13 IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ motion is granted and the deadline for
14 Defendants to file a Reply in Support of their Motion for Summary Judgment is stayed
15 pending the Cotu·t’s ruling on Defendants’ Motion to Strike (Dkt 47).
I6
17
18
l9
20 n
21
22
23
24 »
25
26
C so 2:04-cv-00691-IVIHIVI-LOA Documonj 53-2 Filed O5/O3/2006 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00691-MHM-LOA

Document 53-2

Filed 05/03/2006

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00691-MHM-LOA

Document 53-2

Filed 05/03/2006

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00691-MHM-LOA

Document 53-2

Filed 05/03/2006

Page 3 of 3