Free Order on Motion to Amend/Correct - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 On September 6, 2005, Plaintiff filed a M otion to Amend his Complaint a third 15 time to add 17 new Defendants and a new claim. (Dkt. 143). Defendant Value Options, 16 Inc. (Defendant) filed a Response (Dkt. 144), to which Plaintiff filed a Reply (Dkt. 149). 17 On October 31, 2005, M agistrate Judge M orton Sitver issued a Report and 18 Recommendation (Dkt. 165) regarding Plaintiff's M otion to Amend. Plaintiff filed an 19 Objection (Dkt. 168) and Defendant a Response (Dkt. 173). 20 S tandard of Review 21 A district court judge reviews de novo the Report and Recommendation of a 22 M agistrate Judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). 23 Discussion 24 The Court, having reviewed the record de novo, including the Objections filed by 25 Petitioner, adopts in full the Report and Recommendations filed October 31, 2005, and 26 incorporates the same as a part of this Order. 27 28 vs. Value Options, Inc., et al., Defendants. Shannon M ichael Clark, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CIV 03-1344-PHX-EHC (M S) ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 2:03-cv-01344-EHC-HCE

Document 190

Filed 12/16/2005

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 143).

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendations of the M agistrate Judge is adopted in full. (Dkt 165). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's M otion to Amend is DENIED. (Dkt.

DATED this 14th day of December, 2005.

Case 2:03-cv-01344-EHC-HCE

-2Document 190 Filed 12/16/2005

Page 2 of 2