Free Initial Disclosures - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 34.7 kB
Pages: 4
Date: May 21, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 732 Words, 4,937 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/38565/12.pdf

Download Initial Disclosures - District Court of Delaware ( 34.7 kB)


Preview Initial Disclosures - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:07-cv-00424-GMS

Document 12

Filed 05/21/2008

Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE LEIGH ANN HARRISON, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF DELAWARE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

C.A. No.: 07-424(GMS) Trial By Jury Demanded

DEFENDANT'S RULE 26(a)(1) INITIAL DISCLOSURES Defendant, State of Delaware, Department of Health and Social Services ("DHSS"), discloses the following information in compliance with Rule 26(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Scheduling Order in this matter. These disclosures are based on information reasonably available to defendant as of this date. Continuing investigation and discovery may alter these disclosures. Defendant reserves the right to supplement the information disclosed below if additional information becomes available. By making these disclosures, defendant does not represent that they are identifying every document, tangible thing, or witness possibly relevant to this claim. Nor does defendant waive their rights to object to the production of any document or tangible thing disclosed on the basis of any privilege, the work-product doctrine, relevancy, undue burden or any other valid objection. Defendant's disclosure represent a good faith effort to identify information they reasonably believe is required by Rule 26(a)(1).

Case 1:07-cv-00424-GMS

Document 12

Filed 05/21/2008

Page 2 of 4

Defendant's disclosures are made without waiver of: (1) the right to object on grounds of competency, privilege, relevancy and materiality, hearsay or other proper ground, (2) the right to object to the use of any such information, for any purpose, in whole or in part, in any other action; and (3) the right to object on any and all proper grounds, at any time, to any other discovery request or proceeding involving or relating to the subject matter of these disclosures. All of the disclosures set forth below are made subject to the above objections and qualifications. (A) Individuals likely to have discoverable information in support of

defendant's defenses: 1. Dr. Jane Getchell; DPH Laboratory Director; 30 Sunnyside Road,

Smyrna, DE 19977. Dr. Getchell oversaw the laboratories at DPH including the facilities at which plaintiff worked. Dr. Getchell had both e-mail and personal communication with the plaintiff. 2. Frederick Franz; Quality Assurance/Laboratory Manager; 30 Sunnyside

Road, Smyrna, DE 19977. Mr. Franz was the plaintiff's direct supervisor until December of 2005. 3. Barbara Crosier; Human Resource Specialist at DHSS. She received

communications from the plaintiff in October of 2004. 4. Ted Mermigos; Division of Child Support Enforcement. He conducted

the investigation surrounding the plaintiff's EEOC charge. 5. Marie Collins; Human Resource Specialist at DHSS. She initially worked

on the plaintiff's EEOC charge for DHSS.

Case 1:07-cv-00424-GMS

Document 12

Filed 05/21/2008

Page 3 of 4

6.

Donna Phillips-DiMaria; CLIA Surveyor for State of Delaware.

Reviewed an incident involving plaintiff and an error on an HIV test. In addition, defendant reserves the right, pursuant to Rule 26(e) to identify additional witnesses. Defendant further reserves the right to identify and call any witnesses listed by the plaintiff. (B) 1. Documents that may be used to support State defendant's defenses: Documents contained in the plaintiff's personnel file maintained by the

Human Resources office at DHSS including letters sent to, and received from, the plaintiff (and/or legal counsel) pertaining to her termination from employment. 2. 3. Documents pertaining to the EEOC charges filed by the plaintiff. Various e-mails and correspondence regarding training opportunities

provided to plaintiff and training opportunities rejected by DHSS. 4. Various e-mails and correspondence regarding the plaintiff's concerns

about her position during her maternity leave. 5. DHSS policies regarding reporting and investigation of complaints of

discrimination. 6. anxiety attack. 7. Plaintiff's employee performance plan and performance plans of Documents relating to plaintiff taking leave after the January 17, 2006

employees in similar positions. 8. Documentation of workers' compensation payments made to the plaintiff.

Case 1:07-cv-00424-GMS

Document 12

Filed 05/21/2008

Page 4 of 4

State defendant reserves the right, pursuant to Rule 26(e) to identify additional documents. State defendant further reserves the right to identify and utilize any document listed by the plaintiff. (C) Damage Computation:

Not applicable. (D) Insurance Agreements:

Not applicable. STATE OF DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE s/s Kevin R. Slattery_______ Kevin R. Slattery, I.D. #2297 Deputy Attorney General 820 N. French Street, 6th Floor Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 577-8400 Attorney for State of Delaware, Department of Health and Human Services Dated: May 21, 2008