Free Notice of Service - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 100.7 kB
Pages: 9
Date: September 7, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,652 Words, 10,832 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/38408/13.pdf

Download Notice of Service - District Court of Delaware ( 100.7 kB)


Preview Notice of Service - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:07-cv-00359-JJF-MPT

Document 13

Filed 08/29/2007

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ----------------------------------------------------------x TIMOTHY CARSON, : on behalf of himself and others : similarly situated, : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : : ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, : : Defendant. : ----------------------------------------------------------x

Civil Action No. 07-359 FLSA COLLECTIVE ACTION

NOTICE OF SERVICE I, Herbert W. Mondros, the undersigned counsel for the Plaintiff in the abovecaptioned case, hereby certify that two (2) true and correct copies of the Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories to Defendant were sent via U. S. Mail postage pre-paid on August 29, 2007 to the following:

Sheldon N. Sandler, Esq. Young Conway Stargett & Taylor, LLP The Brandywine Building 1000 West Street P.O. Box 391 Wilmington, DE 19899

Harry I. Johnson, III Jones Day 555 S. Flower St. Los Angeles, CA 90071

MARGOLIS EDELSTEIN s/ Herbert W. Mondros Herbert W. Mondros, Esq. (#3308) 750 South Madison Street, Suite 102 Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 888-1112 (302) 888-1119 fax Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: August 29, 2007

Case 1:07-cv-00359-JJF-MPT

Document 13-2

Filed 08/29/2007

Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ----------------------------------------------------------x TIMOTHY CARSON, : on behalf of himself and others : similarly situated, : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : : : ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, : : Defendant. : ----------------------------------------------------------x

Civil Action No. 07-359 FLSA COLLECTIVE ACTION

PLAINTIFF'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT Pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Timothy Carson by and through his counsel, hereby propounds the following Interrogatories upon Defendant AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP ("Defendant") to be answered in writing under oath within thirty (30) days of service hereof. In responding to these Interrogatories, the following definitions and instructions shall apply: DEFINITIONS The following definitions apply in the discovery below, whether or not they are capitalized, underlined, bolded, or otherwise emphasized. A. "DEFENDANT" means the company nationally known as AstraZeneca

Pharmaceuticals LP ("AstraZeneca"), and all subsidiaries and affiliates of AstraZeneca that, any time on or after June 6, 2004, the date that is three years before the date the initial complaint in this action was filed, have been owned or controlled by AstraZeneca and have developed, produced, manufactured, sold or marketed any pharmaceutical products.

1

Case 1:07-cv-00359-JJF-MPT

Document 13-2

Filed 08/29/2007

Page 2 of 8

B. June 6, 2004. C.

The term "ALLEGED LIABILITY PERIOD" means any and all times on or after

The term "PHARMACEUTICAL REP" includes the named plaintiff(s) and

means each and all persons who, during any part of the ALLEGED LIABILITY PERIOD, have been employed in the United States by DEFENDANT in any job whose job title is or was any of the following titles, or who performed substantially the same work as any employees whose job title is or was any of the following titles: 1. 2. 3. 4. D. Sales Representative Professional Sales Representative Specialty Sales Representative Senior Specialty Sales Representative

The term "COVERED POSITIONS" means the job positions of the

PHARMACEUTICAL REPS. E. The term "OVERTIME PAY" means payment of employee compensation for

work in excess of 40 hours per week at any rate of compensation increased by reason of the employee working more than 40 hours in a week. F. The term "DOCUMENT" is defined to be synonymous in meaning and equal in

scope to the usage of this term in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34(a). A draft of non-identical copy is a separate document within the meaning of this term. A request for production of 'documents' shall encompass, and the response shall include, electronically stored information, as included in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34, unless otherwise specified by the requesting party.

2

Case 1:07-cv-00359-JJF-MPT

Document 13-2

Filed 08/29/2007

Page 3 of 8

G.

The term "COMMUNICATION" means the transmittal of information (in the

form of facts, ideas, inquiries or otherwise). H. The term "CONCERNING" means relating to, referring to, describing, evidencing

or constituting. I. The term "DISCRETION AND INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT" is defined to be

synonymous in meaning and equal in scope to the usage of these terms in 29 C.F.R. ' 541.200. J. The term "GENERAL BUSINESS OPERATIONS" is defined to be synonymous

in meaning and equal in scope to the usage of these terms in 29 C.F.R. ' 541.200. K. The term "IDENTIFY," when referring to documents or electronically stored

information, means to provide, to the extent known, the (i) type of document; (ii) general subject matter; (iii) date of the document; and (iv) author(s), addressee(s) and recipient(s). L. The term "PERSON" is defined as any natural person or any business, legal or

governmental entity or association. M. The term "MAKING SALES" is defined to be synonymous in meaning and equal

in scope to the usage of these terms in 29 C.F.R. ' 541.500. N. The term "MANAGEMENT" is defined to be synonymous in meaning and equal

in scope to the usage of these terms in 29 C.F.R. ' 541.200. O. The term "MEDICAL FACILITIES" means doctors offices, hospitals, clinics,

pharmacies, and all other entities and organizations that provide medical care. P. The term "NAMED PLAINTIFF" means Timothy Carson. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION A. The terms "all" and "each" shall both be construed as all and each.

3

Case 1:07-cv-00359-JJF-MPT

Document 13-2

Filed 08/29/2007

Page 4 of 8

B.

The connectives "and" and "or" shall be construed either disjunctively or

conjunctively as necessary to bring within the scope of the discovery request all responses that might otherwise be construed to be outside of its scope. C. D. The use of the singular form of any word includes the plural and vice versa. Even if a request or category of documents below is phrased in the present tense,

in should be interpreted to include the entire ALLEGED LIABILITY PERIOD. E. "YOU" and "YOUR" refer to any and all Responding Parties.

INTERROGATORIES INTERROGATORY 1: State the total number of Pharmaceutical Reps who worked for DEFENDANT nationwide during the ALLEGED LIABILITY PERIOD, including the total number of Pharmaceutical Reps who worked for DEFENDANT in Delaware during the class period. For all such employees, (a) identify the name and any and all contact information DEFENDANT possesses associated with that name (including without limitation the person's address, home phone, cellular phone, e-mail address); (b) the position and/or job title; (c) the job description; (d) the job assignment(s) and/or duty(s); (e) the territory, district, area, region and/or department; and (f) the exemption under which the employee was classified, including the date of such classification and any change in such classification. RESPONSE:

4

Case 1:07-cv-00359-JJF-MPT

Document 13-2

Filed 08/29/2007

Page 5 of 8

INTERROGATORY 2: State the total number of persons to whom each of the COVERED EMPLOYEES immediately reported while employed in ANY COVERED POSITION. For all such employees, (a) identify the name and any and all contact information DEFENDANT possesses associated with that name (including without limitation the person's address, home phone, cellular phone, email address); (b) the position and/or job title; (c) the job description; and (d) the territory, district, area, region and/or department. RESPONSE:

INTERROGATORY 3:
State the total number of persons to whom each of the employees identified in Interrogatory 2 immediately reported. For all such employees, (a) identify the name and any and all contact information DEFENDANT possesses associated with that name (including without limitation the person's address, home phone, cellular phone, e-mail address); (b) the position and/or job title; (c) the job description; and (d) the territory, district, area, region and/or department. RESPONSE:

5

Case 1:07-cv-00359-JJF-MPT

Document 13-2

Filed 08/29/2007

Page 6 of 8

INTERROGATORY 4:
State the total number of persons to whom each of the employees identified in Interrogatory 3 immediately reported. For all such employees, (a) identify the name and any and all contact information DEFENDANT possesses associated with that name (including without limitation the person's address, home phone, cellular phone, e-mail address); (b) the position and/or job title; (c) the job description; and (d) the territory, district, area, region and/or department. RESPONSE:

INTERROGATORY 5: State the names of all entities, departments, divisions and other groupings of DEFENDANT and the address of each, which, during part of the COVERED PERIOD, have exercised any substantial control of human resource functions, personnel functions, payroll, or employee benefit administration with respect to any of the COVERED EMPLOYEES. RESPONSE:

INTERROGATORY 6:

6

Case 1:07-cv-00359-JJF-MPT

Document 13-2

Filed 08/29/2007

Page 7 of 8

State the name, last known home, work, and cell telephone numbers, last known home and work addresses, and all last known email addresses of all persons and entities (other than employees of DEFENDANT) from whom the DEFENDANT received advice or consultation during any time since June 6, 2002 regarding marketing pharmaceutical products to medical professionals or MEDICAL FACILITIES. RESPONSE:

INTERROGATORY 7: State the name, last known home, work, and cell telephone numbers, last known home and work addresses, and all last known email addresses of all current and former employees of DEFENDANT who worked during any time since June 6, 2002 on formulating or changing the policies, procedures, protocols, routines, systems, programs, practices, routines, processes, or rules, of DEFENDANT concerning marketing pharmaceutical products to medical professionals or MEDICAL FACILITIES. RESPONSE:

MARGOLIS EDELSTEIN S/ Herbert W. Mondros Herbert W. Mondros, Esquire (Del. Bar No. 3308) 750 S. Madison Street, Suite 102 Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Tel. (302) 888-1112 Fax (302) 888-1119 Charles Joseph, Esquire* Joseph & Herzfeld, LLP 757 Third Avenue, Suite 2500 New York, NY 10017 Tel. (212) 688-5640 Fax (212) 688-2548

7

Case 1:07-cv-00359-JJF-MPT

Document 13-2

Filed 08/29/2007

Page 8 of 8

Eric B. Kingsley, Esquire* Kingsley & Kingsley 16133 Venture Blvd., Suite 1200 Encino, CA 91436 Tel. (818) 990-8300 Fax (818) 990-2903 Ira Spiro, Esquire* Spiro Moss Barness LLP 11377 W. Olympic Blvd, 5th Fl Los Angeles, CA 90064 Tel. (310) 235-2468 Fax (310) 235-2456 * Admission Pro Hac Vice to be sought

Dated: August 29, 2007

8