Free Case Transferred In - District Transfer - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF

Document 51

Filed 05/01/2007

Page 1 of 7

CLOSED, TEB

U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (Miami) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:07-cv-20389-JEM

Coffee Bean Trading-Roasting, LLC v. Coffee Holding, Inc. Date Filed: 02/13/2007 Assigned to: Judge Jose E. Martinez Jury Demand: None Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other Jurisdiction: Diversity Plaintiff Coffee Bean Trading-Roasting, LLC a Delaware limited liability company represented by Jose Manuel Ferrer Baker & McKenzie 1111 Brickell Avenue Suite 1700 Miami, FL 33131-3214 305-789-8980 Fax: 789-8953 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V. Defendant Coffee Holding, Inc. a Nevada corporation represented by Christopher F. Graham Thacher Proffitt & Wood LLP 50 Main Street White Plains, NY 10606 US Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED John Roger Squitero Katz Barron Squitero Faust & Berman 2699 S Bayshore Drive 7th Floor Miami, FL 33133-5408 305-856-2444 Fax: 285-9227 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Mark Shiels Auerbacher Katz Barron Squitero Faust

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF

Document 51

Filed 05/01/2007

Page 2 of 7

2699 S Bayshore Drive 7th Floor Miami, FL 33133-5408 305-856-2444 Fax: 285-9227 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Counter Claimant Coffee Holding, Inc. a Nevada corporation represented by Mark Shiels Auerbacher (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V. Counter Defendant Coffee Bean Trading-Roasting, LLC a Delaware limited liability company

Date Filed 02/13/2007

#

Docket Text 1 VERIFIED COMPLAINT against Coffee Holding, Inc. Filing fee $ 350. Receipt#: 954710, filed by Coffee Bean Trading-Roasting, LLC.(el) (Entered: 02/13/2007) 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Supporting Memorandum of law by Coffee Bean Trading-Roasting, LLC. Responses due by 2/28/2007 (el) (Entered: 02/13/2007) 3 NOTICE OF FILING AFFIDAVIT signed by : Ernesto Aguila in support of 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Coffee Bean Trading-Roasting, LLC. (el) (Entered: 02/13/2007) 4 Summons Issued as to Coffee Holding, Inc. by serving registered agent: CSC Services of Nevada,Inc. (el) (Entered: 02/13/2007) 5 ORDER Setting Hearing on Motion 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order: Motion Hearing set for 2/16/2007 03:00 PM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 2/14/2007 (lc1) (Entered: 02/14/2007) 6 Order Requiring Parties to Meet and File Joint Scheduling Report. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 02/14/2007 (dq) (Entered: 02/14/2007) 7 NOTICE of Compliance WITH COURT ORDER by Coffee Bean Trading-Roasting, LLC re 5 Order Setting Hearing on Motion (Ferrer, Jose) (Entered: 02/14/2007) 8 MOTION attend hearing telephonically by Coffee Holding, Inc..

02/13/2007

02/13/2007

02/13/2007 02/14/2007

02/14/2007

02/14/2007

02/15/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF

Document 51

Filed 05/01/2007

Page 3 of 7

(Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Order Approving Telephonic Appearance)(Auerbacher, Mark) (Entered: 02/15/2007) 02/15/2007 9 Endorsed ORDER granting 8 Unopposed Motion to Allow Defendant's Attorney, Christopher F. Graham to Attend Hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order Telephonically Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 2/15/2007 (lc1) (Entered: 02/15/2007) 10 MOTION Transfer Venue re 1 Complaint, 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Coffee Holding, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Order Granting Motion to Transfer Venue)(Auerbacher, Mark) (Entered: 02/15/2007) 16 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Christopher F. Graham, Filing Fee $75, Receipt #954943. (cw) (Entered: 02/19/2007) 11 MOTION Dismiss Motion for Temporary Restraining Order re 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, 3 Affidavit by Coffee Holding, Inc.. (Auerbacher, Mark) (Entered: 02/16/2007) 12 AFFIDAVIT in Opposition re 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, 10 MOTION Transfer Venue re 1 Complaint, 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, 11 MOTION Dismiss Motion for Temporary Restraining Order re 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, 3 Affidavit filed by Coffee Holding, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Andrew Gordon# 2 Exhibit Exhibits A & B# 3 Affidavit Salvatore Reda)(Auerbacher, Mark) (Entered: 02/16/2007) 13 ORDER denying 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 2/16/2007 (lc1) (Entered: 02/16/2007) 14 Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (D.E. No. 2) and Directing Expedited Response to Defendant's Motion to Enforce a Forum Selection Clause and To Transfer Venue. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 2/16/2007 (lc1) (Entered: 02/16/2007) 15 Notice of Docket Correction: The wrong document was attached to docket number 13. The correct document is located at docket number 14. re 13 Order on Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (lc1) (Entered: 02/16/2007) 17 Minute Entry: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Motion Hearing held on 2/16/2007 re 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Coffee Bean Trading-Roasting, LLC, (Court Reporter Larry Herr.) (wh) (Entered: 02/23/2007) 18 ORDER granting 16 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Name of Attorney Christopher F. Graham for Coffee Holding, Inc. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 2/23/2007 (ls) (Entered: 02/26/2007) 19 RESPONSE in Opposition re 10 MOTION Transfer Venue re 1 Complaint, 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO ENFORCE A FORUM SELECTION CLAUSE AND TRANSFER VENUE filed by Coffee Bean

02/15/2007

02/15/2007 02/16/2007

02/16/2007

02/16/2007 02/16/2007

02/16/2007

02/23/2007

02/23/2007

02/26/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF

Document 51

Filed 05/01/2007

Page 4 of 7

Trading-Roasting, LLC. (Ferrer, Jose) (Entered: 02/26/2007) 02/26/2007 20 Plaintiff's MOTION TO CONSIDER THE FILING OF ITS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE TIMELY re 19 Response in Opposition to Motion, by Coffee Bean Trading-Roasting, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Ferrer, Jose) (Entered: 02/26/2007) 21 RESPONSE in Opposition re 20 Plaintiff's MOTION TO CONSIDER THE FILING OF ITS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE TIMELY re 19 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Coffee Holding, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1)(Auerbacher, Mark) (Entered: 02/27/2007) 22 RESPONSE Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Objection to Motion to Consider the Filing of its Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Transfer Venue Timely filed by Coffee Bean Trading-Roasting, LLC. (Ferrer, Jose) (Entered: 03/02/2007) 23 REPLY to Response to Motion re 20 Plaintiff's MOTION TO CONSIDER THE FILING OF ITS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE TIMELY re 19 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Coffee Holding, Inc.. (Auerbacher, Mark) (Entered: 03/02/2007) 24 SUMMONS Returned Executed Coffee Holding, Inc. served on 2/21/2007, answer due 3/13/2007. (bs) (Entered: 03/05/2007) 25 NOTICE by Coffee Holding, Inc. re 23 Reply to Response to Motion, to Transfer Venue (Auerbacher, Mark) (Entered: 03/05/2007) 26 Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike 23 Reply to Response to Motion, CERTAIN PORTIONS OF DEFENDANT'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO ENFORCE A FORUM SELECTION CLAUSE AND TO TRANSFER VENUE OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR LEAVE TO FILE SURREPLY by Coffee Bean Trading-Roasting, LLC. Responses due by 3/20/2007 (Ferrer, Jose) (Entered: 03/06/2007) 27 RESPONSE in Opposition re 26 Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike 23 Reply to Response to Motion, CERTAIN PORTIONS OF DEFENDANT'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO ENFORCE A FORUM SELECTION CLAUSE AND TO TRANSFER VENUE OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR LEAVE TO FILE SURREPLY filed by Coffee Holding, Inc.. (Auerbacher, Mark) (Entered: 03/07/2007) 28 RESPONSE to 27 Response in Opposition to Motion, PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SURREPLY filed by Coffee Bean Trading-Roasting, LLC. (Ferrer, Jose) (Entered: 03/12/2007) 29 Coffee Holding, Co. Inc.'s ANSWER to Complaint Coffee Bean TradingRoasting LLC, First COUNTERCLAIM against Coffee Bean Trading-

02/27/2007

03/02/2007

03/02/2007

03/05/2007 03/05/2007 03/06/2007

03/07/2007

03/12/2007

03/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF

Document 51

Filed 05/01/2007

Page 5 of 7

Roasting, LLC by Coffee Holding, Inc..(Auerbacher, Mark) (Entered: 03/13/2007) 03/21/2007 03/21/2007 30 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Coffee Bean Trading-Roasting, LLC. (Ferrer, Jose) (Entered: 03/21/2007) 31 NOTICE by Coffee Bean Trading-Roasting, LLC re 30 Corporate Disclosure Statement OF CORRECTING CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (Ferrer, Jose) (Entered: 03/21/2007) 32 Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Coffee Holding, Inc.. Responses due by 4/4/2007 (Attachments: # 1) (Auerbacher, Mark) (Entered: 03/21/2007) 33 ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 3/23/2007.(lc1) (Entered: 03/23/2007) 34 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Coffee Holding, Inc., Coffee Holding, Inc.. (Auerbacher, Mark) (Entered: 03/23/2007) Reset Deadlines as to 32 Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order. Response due by 4/2/2007 (dm) (Entered: 03/26/2007) 35 RESPONSE in Opposition re 32 Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Cross-Motion to Appoint a Receiver to Orderly Dissolve Company filed by Coffee Bean Trading-Roasting, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit C# 4 Exhibit D) (Ferrer, Jose) (Entered: 03/27/2007) 36 NOTICE by Coffee Bean Trading-Roasting, LLC re 32 Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, 35 Response in Opposition to Motion, of Filing Affidavit of Ernesto Aguila in Opposition to Coffee Holding's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and in Support of Cross-Motion to Appoint a Receiver (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Ernesto Aguila)(Ferrer, Jose) (Entered: 03/27/2007) 37 Defendant's MOTION to Strike 36 Notice (Other), Notice (Other), 35 Response in Opposition to Motion, by Coffee Holding, Inc., Coffee Holding, Inc.. Responses due by 4/12/2007 (Auerbacher, Mark) (Entered: 03/29/2007) 38 PLAINTIFF'S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO COUNTS V AND VI - ANSWER to Counterclaim by Coffee Bean TradingRoasting, LLC.(Ferrer, Jose) (Entered: 04/02/2007) 39 Plaintiff's MOTION to Dismiss 29 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim CERTAIN COUNTS OF DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIM by Coffee Bean Trading-Roasting, LLC. Responses due by 4/16/2007 (Ferrer, Jose) (Entered: 04/02/2007) 40 NOTICE by Coffee Bean Trading-Roasting, LLC re 3 Affidavit PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF FILING EXCLUDED EXHIBIT TO

03/21/2007

03/23/2007

03/23/2007 03/23/2007

03/27/2007

03/27/2007

03/29/2007

04/02/2007

04/02/2007

04/02/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF

Document 51

Filed 05/01/2007

Page 6 of 7

AFFIDAVIT OF ERNESTO AGUILA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A) (Ferrer, Jose) (Entered: 04/02/2007) 04/03/2007 41 REPLY to Response to Motion re 32 Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Coffee Holding, Inc.. (Auerbacher, Mark) (Entered: 04/03/2007) 42 RESPONSE in Opposition re 37 Defendant's MOTION to Strike 36 Notice (Other), Notice (Other), 35 Response in Opposition to Motion, for a Temporary Restraining Order filed by Coffee Bean Trading-Roasting, LLC. (Ferrer, Jose) (Entered: 04/06/2007) 43 RESPONSE in Opposition re 32 Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, 37 Defendant's MOTION to Strike 36 Notice (Other), Notice (Other), 35 Response in Opposition to Motion, to Plaintiff's Cross-Motion to Appoint a Receiver filed by Coffee Holding, Inc., Coffee Holding, Inc.. (Auerbacher, Mark) (Entered: 04/10/2007) 44 REPLY to Response to Motion re 37 Defendant's MOTION to Strike 36 Notice (Other), Notice (Other), 35 Response in Opposition to Motion, Reply in Further Support filed by Coffee Holding, Inc., Coffee Holding, Inc.. (Auerbacher, Mark) (Entered: 04/13/2007) 45 RESPONSE to 43 Response in Opposition to Motion, PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S CROSS-MOTION TO APPOINT RECEIVER filed by Coffee Bean Trading-Roasting, LLC. (Ferrer, Jose) (Entered: 04/13/2007) 46 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 39 Plaintiff's MOTION to Dismiss 29 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim -CERTAIN COUNTS OF DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIM filed by Coffee Holding, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A thru C)(Auerbacher, Mark) (Entered: 04/16/2007) 47 REPORT REGARDING Joint Scheduling by Coffee Bean TradingRoasting, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit PreTrial Deadlines and Trial Date# 2 Exhibit Election to Jurisdiction)(Ferrer, Jose) (Entered: 04/19/2007) 48 ORDER denying 32 Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 4/19/2007. (ls) (Entered: 04/20/2007) 49 ORDER granting 37 Motion to Strike Certain Portions of 35 Response in Opposition to Motion. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 4/19/2007. (ls) (Entered: 04/20/2007) 50 ORDER denying as moot 39 Motion to Dismiss, granting 10 Motion to Enforce a Forum Selection Clause and to Transfer Venue, granting 20 Motion to consider the filing of its Response in opposition to defendant's Motion to Transfer Venue timely, denying 26 Motion to Strike certain portions of defendant's Reply in support of its Motion to Enforce a Forum

04/06/2007

04/10/2007

04/13/2007

04/13/2007

04/16/2007

04/19/2007

04/19/2007

04/19/2007

04/20/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF

Document 51

Filed 05/01/2007

Page 7 of 7

Selection Clause and to Transfer Venue or, alternatively, for Leave to File Surreply; Directing Clerk to Transfer case to the USDC, District of Delaware; Closing Case. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 4/20/2007. (ls) (Entered: 04/20/2007) 04/25/2007 51 Transmittal Letter Sent With Certified Copies of Transfer Order and Docket Sheet, To: USDC, District of Delaware (ls) (Entered: 04/25/2007)

PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt
05/02/2007 10:54:34 PACER Login: ud0037 Description: Billable Pages: 4 Client Code: Cost: 0.32 Docket Report Search Criteria: 1:07-cv-20389-JEM

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 69 1 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007 Page

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 2 of 69 2 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007 Page

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 3 of 69 3 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007 Page

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 4 of 69 4 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007 Page

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 5 of 69 5 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007 Page

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 6 of 69 6 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007 Page

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 7 of 69 7 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007 Page

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 8 of 69 8 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007 Page

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 9 of 69 9 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007 Page

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 10Page 10 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 11Page 11 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 12Page 12 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 13Page 13 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 14Page 14 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 15Page 15 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 16Page 16 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 17Page 17 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 18Page 18 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 19Page 19 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 20Page 20 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 21Page 21 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 22Page 22 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 23Page 23 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 24Page 24 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 25Page 25 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 26Page 26 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 27Page 27 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 28Page 28 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 29Page 29 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 30Page 30 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 31Page 31 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 32Page 32 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 33Page 33 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 34Page 34 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 35Page 35 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 36Page 36 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 37Page 37 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 38Page 38 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 39Page 39 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 40Page 40 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 41Page 41 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 42Page 42 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 43Page 43 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 44Page 44 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 45Page 45 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 46Page 46 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 47Page 47 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 48Page 48 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 49Page 49 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 50Page 50 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 51Page 51 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 52Page 52 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 53Page 53 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 54Page 54 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 55Page 55 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 56Page 56 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 57Page 57 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 58Page 58 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 59Page 59 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 60Page 60 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 61Page 61 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 62Page 62 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 63Page 63 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 64Page 64 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 65Page 65 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 66Page 66 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 67Page 67 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 68Page 68 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-2 of 69 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 1 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 69Page 69 of 69 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 70 1 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007 Page

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 2 of 70 2 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007 Page

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 3 of 70 3 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007 Page

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 4 of 70 4 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007 Page

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 5 of 70 5 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007 Page

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 6 of 70 6 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007 Page

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 7 of 70 7 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007 Page

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 8 of 70 8 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007 Page

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 9 of 70 9 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007 Page

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 10Page 10 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 11Page 11 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 12Page 12 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 13Page 13 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 14Page 14 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 15Page 15 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 16Page 16 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 17Page 17 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 18Page 18 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 19Page 19 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 20Page 20 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 21Page 21 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 22Page 22 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 23Page 23 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 24Page 24 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 25Page 25 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 26Page 26 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 27Page 27 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 28Page 28 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 29Page 29 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 30Page 30 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 31Page 31 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 32Page 32 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 33Page 33 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 34Page 34 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 35Page 35 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 36Page 36 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 37Page 37 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 38Page 38 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 39Page 39 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 40Page 40 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 41Page 41 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 42Page 42 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 43Page 43 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 44Page 44 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 45Page 45 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 46Page 46 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 47Page 47 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 48Page 48 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 49Page 49 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 50Page 50 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 51Page 51 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 52Page 52 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 53Page 53 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 54Page 54 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 55Page 55 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 56Page 56 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 57Page 57 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 58Page 58 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 59Page 59 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 60Page 60 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 61Page 61 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 62Page 62 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 63Page 63 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 64Page 64 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 65Page 65 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 66Page 66 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 67Page 67 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 68Page 68 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 69Page 69 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-3 of 70 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 70Page 70 of 70 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-4 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 3 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 6 1 of 6 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007 Page

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-4 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 3 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 2 of 6 2 of 6 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007 Page

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-4 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 3 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 3 of 6 3 of 6 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007 Page

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-4 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 3 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 4 of 6 4 of 6 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007 Page

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-4 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 3 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 5 of 6 5 of 6 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007 Page

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-4 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 3 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 6 of 6 6 of 6 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007 Page

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-5 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 4 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 1 1 of 1 FLSD Docket 02/13/2007 Page

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-6 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 5 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 of 2 FLSD Docket 02/14/2007 Page

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division Case Number: 07-20389-CIV-MARTINEZ-BANDSTRA COFFEE BEAN TRADING-ROASTING, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiff, vs. COFFEE HOLDING, INC., a Nevada corporation, Defendant. _____________________________________/ ORDER SETTING HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (D.E. No. 2), filed on February 13, 2007. It is ADJUDGED that a hearing shall take place before the undersigned, United States District Judge Jose E. Martinez, at the United States Courthouse, 301 N. Miami Ave., Miami, Florida 33128 on Friday, February 16, 2007 at 3:00 PM. Counsel shall be prepared to address Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (D.E. No. 2). This hearing shall not exceed thirty (30) minutes. The parties shall confer prior to the hearing to determine how to split the allotted time. If the parties are unable to agree on how to split the allotted time, the Court will decide how to split the allotted time. It shall be Plaintiff's responsibility to immediately serve a copy of this Order on Defendant. Plaintiff shall then certify to the Court in writing that this order was served on Defendant. Such certification shall be filed on the record no later than February 15, 2007.

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-6 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 5 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 2 of 2 2 of 2 FLSD Docket 02/14/2007 Page

Defendant is cautioned that a corporation must be represented by counsel and cannot proceed pro se. Palazzo v. Gulf Oil Corp., 764 F.2d 1381, 1385 (11th Cir. 1985). DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 14 day of February, 2007.

____________________________________ JOSE E. MARTINEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies provided to: Magistrate Judge Bandstra All Counsel of Record

-2-

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-7 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 6 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 9 1 of 9 FLSD Docket 02/14/2007 Page

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division Case Number: 07-20389-CIV-MARTINEZ-BANDSTRA COFFEE BEAN TRADING-ROASTING, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiff, vs. COFFEE HOLDING, INC., a Nevada corporation, Defendant. _____________________________________/ ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO MEET AND FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND PROPOSED ORDER AND DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES THIS MATTER came before the Court upon a sua sponte review of the file. To efficiently, expeditiously, and economically resolve this dispute, it is hereby: ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff shall forward a copy of this Order to all Defendants, upon notice or appearance of defense counsel or pro se Defendant. 2. Discovery in this case shall be conducted in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Southern District of Florida Local Rules (effective April 15, 2003), except the deadlines under Local Rules 16.1.D., E., H., J., K., and L., may be modified by further order of the Court. 3. WITHIN FORTY FIVE (45) DAYS OF THE APPEARANCE OF A DEFENDANT, counsel and pro se litigants shall file a Joint Scheduling Report and Joint Proposed Scheduling Order pursuant to Local Rule 16.1B.2, with a complete service list containing the name, address, phone number, fax number, and party represented by each counsel or pro se litigant. 4. Counsel for the parties and pro se litigants shall meet in person for a scheduling

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-7 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 6 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 2 of 9 2 of 9 FLSD Docket 02/14/2007 Page
conference at least twenty one (21) days prior to the date the above Joint Proposed Scheduling Order is due. At this conference, the parties shall accomplish the following: (1) determine the appropriate case management track for the action; (2) exchange documents and witness lists in compliance with Local Rules 16.1.D; (3) develop a case management plan which sets deadlines in compliance with paragraphs A, B, and C of this Order; and (4) discuss settlement, in good faith, after reviewing the opposing parties' disclosed documents and witness lists in compliance with Local Rule 16.1.B.1. A. The Joint Scheduling Report shall include all information required by the

eleven subsections, (a) through (k), of Local Rule 16.1.B.2. IN ADDITION TO THE INFORMATION REQUIRED BY THAT RULE, THE REPORT SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: (1) whether the trial will be jury or non-jury; (2) an outline of the legal elements of each claim and defense raised by the pleadings (the parties are advised that this section shall not be a summary of allegations, but should be modeled on pattern substantive jury instructions applicable in this Court); (3) a good faith estimate of the specific dollar valuation of actual damages and other relief at issue; and (4) the need for variance from the discovery limitations imposed by Local Rule and/or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including the grounds supporting the requested variance. In total, the Joint Scheduling Report shall have fifteen numerical sections containing the above required information (eleven to comply with the Local rule, and four to comply with the additional requirements of this Order). Unilateral submissions are prohibited. B. As an attachment to the parties' Joint Scheduling Report, and in

Compliance with Local Rule 16.1.B.2, the parties shall jointly complete Attachment A to this Order. The parties shall insert the specific day, month, and year for each listed deadline that applies to the parties' case management plan. In completing Attachment A, the parties shall take into consideration the suggested pretrial deadlines for a case set out in Attachment B to this Order (attachment B contains suggested deadlines for the standard case management track; attachment C contains suggested deadlines for the expedited case management track. See Local Rule 16.1.A.2). If the parties agree that one or more of the proposed deadlines (such as "expert witness deadlines") is not appropriate for this action, they may strike the language and omit that proposed deadline on Attachment A. The parties' proposed dates shall include: (1) at least -2-

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-7 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 6 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 3 of 9 3 of 9 FLSD Docket 02/14/2007 Page
eight (8) weeks between the deadline for all pretrial dispositive motions and the proposed trial date; and (2) at least two (2) weeks between the deadline for the pretrial stipulation and the proposed trial date. C. As part of the Joint Scheduling Report, the parties shall jointly complete

and file with the Court the Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Election Form appended to this Order as Attachment D. The Court will not accept unilateral submissions in this regard; thus, a "Yes" should be checked only if all parties agree. If the parties consent to a full disposition of the case by the Magistrate Judge, including trial and entry of final judgment, the parties shall jointly file the election form appended to this Order as Attachment E. 5. The foregoing information will aid the Court in its management of this case,

including the expeditious resolution of any discovery disputes, and help the parties focus on the key issues of the case at an early stage in the proceedings. Accordingly, the parties' failure to file a joint scheduling report or otherwise comply with this Order shall result in dismissal, default, or the imposition of other appropriate sanctions, including attorney's fees and costs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: 6. The parties are to submit Certificates of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statements. The Plaintiff, Defendant, Intervenors, and Amicus Curiae, including governmental parties SHALL FILE a Certificate of Interested Persons and Disclosure Statement, which shall contain a complete list of persons, associated persons, firms, partnerships or corporations that have a financial interest in the outcome of this case, including ALL subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, and other identifiable legal entities related to a party. The parties shall have fifteen (15) days from the date of this Order to file the original Certificate. Throughout the pendency of this action, the parties shall be under a continuing duty to amend, correct, and update the Certificate. The parties SHALL NOT include the names of the assigned District Judge and Magistrate Judge, merely by virtue of this case being assigned to them. 7. Every motion filed in this case shall be accompanied by one proposed original

order granting the motion. The order shall contain the up-to-date service list (names and facsimile numbers or addresses) of all counsel or pro se litigants in the case. -3-

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-7 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 6 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 4 of 9 4 of 9 FLSD Docket 02/14/2007 Page
8. In light of the court's "fax-back" program, additional copies of the proposed order

and self-addressed stamped envelopes SHALL NOT be provided. Further, the parties shall be under a continuing duty to ensure the Clerk of the Court is provided with the up-to-date service information. 9. The parties SHALL NOT provide courtesy copies to Chambers, unless requested,

in accordance with Local Rule 5.1.D. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 14th day of February, 2007.

______________________________ JOSE E. MARTINEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies provided to: Magistrate Judge Bandstra All Counsel of Record

-4-

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-7 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 6 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 5 of 9 5 of 9 FLSD Docket 02/14/2007 Page

Pretrial Deadlines and Trial Date DATE month/day/year _________________ Joinder of Additional Parties and motions for class certification. _________________ Parties shall exchange expert witness summaries and reports as required by Local Rule 16.1.K. _________________ Parties shall exchange written lists containing the names and addresses of all witnesses intended to be called at trial and only those witnesses listed shall be permitted to testify. _________________ Parties exchange rebuttal expert witness summaries and reports as required by Local Rule 16.1.K. Note: These provisions pertaining to expert witnesses do not apply to treating physicians, psychologists or other health providers (if a Daubert or Markman hearing may be necessary, the parties are to add that as an additional deadline at the bottom of Attachment A). _________________ All discovery, including expert discovery, shall be completed. _________________ A mediator must be selected. _________________ All summary judgment, Daubert, and other dispositive motions must be filed. A minimum of eight (8) weeks is required for the Court to review dispositive motions prior to filing of the joint pretrial stipulation. If no dispositive motions will be filed, clearly note this fact in the Joint Scheduling Report. _________________ Mediation shall be completed. _________________ All Pretrial Motions and Memoranda of Law must be filed. _________________ Joint Pretrial Stipulation must be filed. _________________ Proposed jury instructions and/or proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law must be filed. _________________ Deposition designations must be filed. _________________ Beginning of Trial Period. _________________ Additional deadlines (please specify).

[Attachment A]

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-7 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 6 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 6 of 9 6 of 9 FLSD Docket 02/14/2007 Page

SUGGESTED PRETRIAL DEADLINES STANDARD CASE MANAGEMENT TRACK Days Before Beginning of Trial Period 240 days 210 days Joinder of Additional Parties and motions for class certification. Parties shall exchange expert witness summaries and reports as required by Local Rule 16.1.K. Parties shall exchange written lists containing the names and addresses of all witnesses intended to be called at trial and only those witnesses listed shall be permitted to testify. Parties exchange rebuttal expert witness summaries and reports as required by Local Rule 16.1.K. Note: These provisions pertaining to expert witnesses do not apply to treating physicians, psychologists or other health providers (if a Daubert or Markman hearing may be necessary, the parties are to add that as an additional deadline at the bottom of Attachment A). All discovery, including expert discovery, shall be completed. A mediator must be selected. All summary judgment, Daubert, and other dispositive motions must be filed. A minimum of eight (8) weeks is required for the Court to review dispositive motions prior to filing of the joint pretrial stipulation. If no dispositive motions will be filed, clearly note this fact in the Joint Scheduling Report. Mediation shall be completed. All Pretrial Motions and Memoranda of Law must be filed. Joint Pretrial Stipulation must be filed. Proposed jury instructions and/or proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law must be filed. Deposition designations must be filed.

200 days

180 days

130 days 120 days 100 days

60 days 45 days 30 days 7 days

1 day

[Attachment B]

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-7 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 6 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 7 of 9 7 of 9 FLSD Docket 02/14/2007 Page

SUGGESTED PRETRIAL DEADLINES EXPEDITED CASE MANAGEMENT TRACK Days Before Beginning of Trial Period 130 days 120 days Joinder of Additional Parties and motions for class certification. Parties shall exchange expert witness summaries and reports as required by Local Rule 16.1.K. Parties shall exchange written lists containing the names and addresses of all witnesses intended to be called at trial and only those witnesses listed shall be permitted to testify. Parties exchange rebuttal expert witness summaries and reports as required by Local Rule 16.1.K. Note: These provisions pertaining to expert witnesses do not apply to treating physicians, psychologists or other health providers (if a Daubert or Markman hearing may be necessary, the parties are to add that as an additional deadline at the bottom of Attachment A). All discovery, including expert discovery, shall be completed. All summary judgment, Daubert, and other dispositive motions must be filed. A minimum of eight (8) weeks is required for the Court to review dispositive motions prior to filing of the joint pretrial stipulation. If no dispositive motions will be filed, clearly note this fact in the Joint Scheduling Report. A mediator must be selected. Mediation shall be completed. All Pretrial Motions and Memoranda of Law must be filed. Joint Pretrial Stipulation must be filed. Proposed jury instructions and/or proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law must be filed. Deposition designations must be filed.

110 days

100 days

75 days 70 days

60 days 30 days 30 days 10 days 7 days

1 day

[Attachment C]

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-7 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 6 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 8 of 9 8 of 9 FLSD Docket 02/14/2007 Page
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division Case Number: 07-20389-CIV-MARTINEZ-BANDSTRA COFFEE BEAN TRADING-ROASTING, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiff, vs. COFFEE HOLDING, INC., a Nevada corporation, Defendant. _____________________________________/ ELECTION TO JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR FINAL DISPOSITION OF MOTIONS In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §636(c), the undersigned parties to the abovecaptioned civil matter hereby jointly and voluntarily elect to have a United States Magistrate Judge decide the following motions and issue a final order or judgment with respect thereto: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Motions for Costs Motions for Attorney's Fees Motions for Sanctions Motions to Dismiss Motions for Summary Judgment Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ Yes _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____ No _____

Other (specify) _______________________________________ ________________________________________ (Signature--Plaintiff's Counsel) ________________________________________ (Signature--Plaintiff's Counsel) ________________________________________ (Signature--Defendant's Counsel) ________________________________________ (Signature--Defendant's Counsel)

____________ (Date) ____________ (Date) ____________ (Date) ____________ (Date)

[Attachment D]

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-7 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 6 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 9 of 9 9 of 9 FLSD Docket 02/14/2007 Page
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division Case Number: 07-20389-CIV-MARTINEZ-BANDSTRA COFFEE BEAN TRADING-ROASTING, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiff, vs. COFFEE HOLDING, INC., a Nevada corporation, Defendant. _____________________________________/ ELECTION TO JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR TRIAL In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §636(c), the undersigned parties to the abovecaptioned civil matter hereby jointly and voluntarily elect to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct any and all further proceedings in the case, including TRIAL, and entry of final judgment with respect thereto. ____________ (Date) ____________ (Date) ____________ (Date) ____________ (Date) __________________________________ (Signature--Plaintiff's Counsel) __________________________________ (Signature--Plaintiff's Counsel) __________________________________ (Signature--Defendant's Counsel) __________________________________ (Signature--Defendant's Counsel)

[Attachment E]

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-8 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 7 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 of 2 FLSD Docket 02/14/2007 Page

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division CASE NO.: 07-20389-CIV-MARTINEZ/BANDSTRA COFFEE BEAN TRADING-ROASTING, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiff, vs. COFFEE HOLDING, INC., a Nevada corporation, Defendant. ________________________________________/ CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH COURT ORDER Plaintiff, Coffee Bean Trading-Roasting, LLC, by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby certifies that it has this 14th day of February, 2007 complied with this Court's Order Setting Hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order dated February 14, 2007 (D.E. No. 5) by serving a true and correct copy of the Order upon counsel for Defendant, Christopher F. Graham, Esq. and Matthew Dyckman, Esq., by facsimile, e-mail and U.S. Mail. Respectfully submitted, BAKER & McKENZIE LLP Mellon Financial Center 1111 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1700 Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 789-8900 Facsimile: (305) 789-8953

By: ____/s/ Jose M. Ferrer_________ Jose M. Ferrer Florida Bar No. 173746

Baker & McKenzie LLP, 1111 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1700, Miami, Florida 33131 - (305) 789-8900

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-8 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 7 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 2 of 2 2 of 2 FLSD Docket 02/14/2007 Page

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was delivered this __14th___ day of February, 2007 to: Christopher F. Graham, Esq. Thacher Proffitt & Wood LLP Two World Financial Center New York, NY 10281 Tel.: (212) 912-7400 Fax.: (212) 912-7751 E-Mail: [email protected] Matthew Dyckman, Esq. Thacher Proffitt & Wood LLP 1700 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Suite 800 Washington, DC 20006 Tel.: (202) 626-5647 Fax.: (202) 626-1930

By: ____/s/ Jose M. Ferrer_________ Jose M. Ferrer

MIADMS/306741.1

Baker & McKenzie LLP, 1111 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1700, Miami, Florida 33131 - (305) 789-8900

2

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-9 4 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 8-1 Entered onFiled 05/01/2007 Page 1 ofPage 1 of 4 FLSD Docket 02/15/2007

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO.: 07-20389 CIV-MARTINEZ COFFEE BEAN TRADING-ROASTING, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiff, vs. COFFEE HOLDING, INC., a Nevada corporation, Defendant. ___________________________________________/ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO ALLOW DEFENDANT'S ATTORNEY, CHRISTOPHER F. GRAHAM TO ATTEND HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER TELEPHONICALLY Defendant, Coffee Holding, Co. Inc., a Nevada corporation, ("Coffee Holding") by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby files this Motion to Allow Christopher F. Graham ("Mr. Graham") to Attend the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order hearing set for Friday, February 16, 2007 telephonically, and as grounds states: Background This matter involves a business dispute between two parties with respect to the operation of a coffee distribution business. Coffee Holding is located in New York and its primary outside litigation counsel is Mr. Graham. Yesterday, Coffee Holding received notice of a hearing set by this Court for Friday, which provided one (1) business day notice. Mr. Graham seeks to appear in person but due to the ice storm in the Northeast and large event weekend in South Florida, he has been unable to obtain a flight to arrive in time for the hearing. As such,

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-9 4 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 8-1 Entered onFiled 05/01/2007 Page 2 ofPage 2 of 4 FLSD Docket 02/15/2007

CASE NO.: 07-20389 CIV-MARTINEZ due to the exigent circumstances, Mr. Graham seeks to have the Court permit him to attend and argue on his client's behalf via a telephonic appearance. Plaintiff's counsel does not oppose this relief.

Analysis of Relief 1. Defendant, Coffee Holding received notice yesterday of a Court

hearing set before this Court on Friday, February 16, 2007 at 3:00 p.m. The notice only provided one business day notice to the Defendant with respect to the hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. 2. Mr. Graham is Coffee Holding's primary outside litigation

counsel and is located in New York City where the Defendant also has its primary operations. 3. A Motion to have Mr. Graham admitted pro hac vice has already

been filed with the Court. 4. As good cause for this motion, Defendant would show that Mr.

Graham has attempted to obtain a flight this evening but due to yesterday's ice storm and related winter conditions that hit the Northeast, there has been travel chaos at the local New York area airports. This includes rescheduling passengers whose flights were cancelled or postponed yesterday to flights scheduled to depart today. As such, Mr. Graham has been unsuccessful in obtaining a flight to reach Miami for tomorrow's hearing. 5. Due to Mr. Graham's inability to obtain a flight prior to

tomorrow's hearing, it is respectfully requested that he be permitted to attend

-2-

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-9 4 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 8-1 Entered onFiled 05/01/2007 Page 3 ofPage 3 of 4 FLSD Docket 02/15/2007

CASE NO.: 07-20389 CIV-MARTINEZ telephonically. 6. Mr. Graham conferred with Plaintiff's counsel on the relief

sought herein and he did not oppose the relief requested. 7. This Motion is brought in good faith and not for dilatory

purposes. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Mark S. Auerbacher, Esq. Florida Bar No. 978220 [email protected] John R. Squitero, Esq. Florida Bar No. 121196 [email protected] KATZ BARRON SQUITERO FAUST 2699 S. Bayshore Drive, 7th Floor Miami, Florida 33133-5408 Telephone: (305) 8562444 Facsimile: (305) 2859227

February 14, 2007

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on February 14, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system which will send a notice of electronic filing to the following: [email protected]. I further certify that I mailed the foregoing document and the notice of electronic filing by first-class mail to the following recipients: Jose Ferrer, Esq. Baker & McKenzie, LLP, 1111 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1700 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 789-8900 Facsimile: (305) 789-8953

-3-

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-9 4 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 8-1 Entered onFiled 05/01/2007 Page 4 ofPage 4 of 4 FLSD Docket 02/15/2007

CASE NO.: 07-20389 CIV-MARTINEZ

/s/Mark S. Auerbacher, Esq.

C:\Documents and Settings\eap\Local Files\OLKB0\HN9046.WPD

Settings\Temporary

Internet

-4-

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-10 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 8-2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 of 2 FLSD Docket 02/15/2007 Page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO.: 07-20389 CIV-MARTINEZ COFFEE BEAN TRADING-ROASTING, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiff, vs. COFFEE HOLDING, INC., a Nevada corporation, Defendant. ___________________________________________/ ORDER APPROVING DEFENDANT'S ATTORNEY, CHRISTOPHER F. GRAHAM TO ATTENDING TELEPHONICALLY ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon a Motion, made pursuant to the Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, for the Motion to Allow Defendant's attorney, Christopher F. Graham to attend hearing telephonically on Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, in this cause and the Court, being fully advised in the premises and having fully reviewed the file, hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the motion is GRANTED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida this ____ day of February, 2007.

_____________________________________ JOSE E. MARTINEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies to all counsel of record

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-10 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 8-2 Entered on Filed 05/01/2007 Page 2 of 2 2 of 2 FLSD Docket 02/15/2007 Page

Case No. 01-2466- CIV-MIDDLEBROOKS

Magistrate Judge Bandstra

H:\LIB\DOCS\11042034\LIT\HN9232.WPD

-2-

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-11 9 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 10-1 Entered onFiled 05/01/2007 Page 1 ofPage 1 of 9 FLSD Docket 02/15/2007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division Case Number: 07-20389-CIV-MARTINEZ-BANDSTRA

COFFEE BEAN TRADING-ROASTING, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiff, vs.

COFFEE HOLDING, CO. INC., a Nevada corporation Defendant.

DEFENDANT COFFEE HOLDING, CO. INC'S MOTION TO ENFORCE A FORUM SELECTION CLAUSE AND TO TRANSFER VENUE AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW Defendant Coffee Holding Co., Inc ("Coffee Holding"), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), hereby moves the Court to enforce the parties choice of venue and transfer this case to the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware1, and in support thereof states the following: I.PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

1

Alternatively, the Court should dismiss or transfer, this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) as venue is not proper in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Federal Courts are empowered under Section 1406(a) to dismiss or transfer a case to a district in which "it could have been brought." 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). This Court should transfer this action to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware pursuant to Section 1406(a) because the operative agreement between the parties mandates that the only proper venue is the District Court of Delaware, thus the case is in the wrong district and should be dismissed or transferred.

1

Case 1:07-cv-00235-JJF Document 51-11 9 Case 1:07-cv-20389-JEM Document 10-1 Entered onFiled 05/01/2007 Page 2 ofPage 2 of 9 FLSD Docket 02/15/2007

As more fully set forth below, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), this case should be transferred to, and litigated in, the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware because the parties affirmatively agreed in the Limited Liability Agreement of Café La Rica, LLC (the "Operating Agreement") to litigate any causes of action arising from the Agreement in Delaware. The language of the Agreement's forum selection clause is unambiguous ­ the parties agreed to litigate all disputes exclusively in Delaware, under Delaware law. Moreover, the parties mutually agreed to waive any claim that Delaware is an inconvenient forum. It is well settled law that, when parties enter into a forum selection clause, the party opposing a motion to transfer pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404 bears a heavy burden of proving that the forum selection clause should not be enforced. The venue mandated by a contractual forumselection clause rarely will be outweighed by any other factor in a 1404(a) analysis. Thus, this Court, pursuant to its power under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), should transfer this case to the only district court in which venue is proper, the District Court for the District of Delaware. II.STATEMENT OF FACTS For purposes of this motion, the facts are set forth below. Plaintiff, Coffee Bean Trading-Roasting, LLC ("Coffee Bean") is a limited liability company organized and operating under the laws of the State of Delaware. Defendant, Coffee Holding, is a corporation organized and operating under the laws of the State of Nevada. Neither the Plaintiff nor Defendant