Free Proposed Voir Dire - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 14.2 kB
Pages: 4
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 917 Words, 5,169 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/37881/23.pdf

Download Proposed Voir Dire - District Court of Delaware ( 14.2 kB)


Preview Proposed Voir Dire - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:07-cr-00034-SLR

Document 23

Filed 09/24/2007

Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TONY CLARK, Defendant.

: : : : : : : : :

Criminal Action No. 07-34-SLR

DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED VOIR DIRE The defendant, Tony Clark, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby proposes the following voir dire questions: 1. A fundamental principal of our legal system is that when a person is charged with a criminal offense he is presumed to be innocent unless and until the government proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. If you are selected as a juror in this case will any of you have reservations or other difficulty applying this rule of law? 2. Do any of you now have an opinion as to Mr. Clark's guilt or innocence? 3. Do any of you believe that because it is the government that is proceeding with this prosecution, that Mr. Clark therefore must be guilty? 4. Do any of you believe that it is the responsibility of the person accused to prove their innocence? 5. Mr. Clark has a constitutional right not to testify. There are many people who feel that 1

Case 1:07-cr-00034-SLR

Document 23

Filed 09/24/2007

Page 2 of 4

if an accused person does not testify, then he must be hiding something. They would expect him to testify. Do any of you believe that if an accused person does not testify, then the accused must be hiding something? 6. Mr. Clark is charged with being a felon in possession of a firearm. Would anything about the nature of this charge cause difficulty for you to sit as a juror in this case? 7. Do any of you have such strong feeling about the charges in general that would make you unable to sit as a juror on this case? 8. Would the knowledge that Mr. Clark has been previously convicted of a felony offense affect your ability to view him as innocent until proven guilty in this case? Would it cause you to think that he must be guilty of the charges in this case? 9. Do any of you belong to crime prevention societies, including but not limited to a neighborhood watch organization? 10. Have any of you worked for, done volunteer work for, or recently applied to work for a law enforcement organization, or do you have close friends or relatives who fit that category ­ That includes, police departments, security offices, the FBI, CIA, ATF, Justice Department, Military Police, DEA, or the United States Attorney's Office? Are any of you a member of or regularly give financial support to the Fraternal Order of Police? Would that affect your ability to be fair in this

case or would it otherwise make it difficult for you to sit in this case? 11. Does anyone believe you will give more or less weight to the testimony of a law enforcement agent or police officer, simply because he or she is employed as a law enforcement agent or police officer? 2

Case 1:07-cr-00034-SLR

Document 23

Filed 09/24/2007

Page 3 of 4

12. Do you believe that a witness must be trustworthy and reliable because they are called by the government? 13. Have any of you sat on a Grand Jury before? The Standard of proof is different than at trial, you must listen to my instructions as to what the standard is in a criminal trial. Would any of you have difficulty with that? 14. Have any of you sat as a juror in a trial before? Was it a civil or criminal case? Did the jury reach a verdict? Is there any thing about that experience that would make it difficult for you to sit in this case? 15. Have any of you or your family members testified in a criminal case? For whom and how did you feel about the experience? 16. In order to reach a verdict, jurors must reach the same conclusion. In deliberations you must consider the opinions and points of your fellow jurors, but in the final analysis you must follow your own conscience and be personally satisfied with the verdict. Will any of you have difficulty expressing your own opinions and thoughts about this case to your fellow jurors? Do any of you feel that you will tend to go along with the majority of jurors even if you don't agree just because you are in the minority? 17. Do any of you have health reasons that would cause you difficulty in sitting as jurors? Do any of you have trouble hearing or do any of you notice that the person next to you does not seem to hear what is going on? 18. Have any of you been a witness to, victim of, or convicted of a crime? 19. Have you heard, read or seen anything about this case from any source, including the 3

Case 1:07-cr-00034-SLR

Document 23

Filed 09/24/2007

Page 4 of 4

newspapers, radio, television, magazines, or other people? 20. Can you think of any reason which you should call to the Court's attention which may have some bearing on your qualifications as a juror or which may prevent you from rendering a fair and impartial verdict based solely on the evidence and instructions as to the law given by the Court? Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Eleni Kousoulis, Esquire Assistant Federal Public Defender 704 King Street, Suite 110 Wilmington, Delaware 19801 (302) 573-6010 [email protected] Attorney for Defendant Tony Clark

Dated: September 24, 2007

4