Free EXPEDITED CHILD SUPPORT PROCESS - Minnesota


File Size: 193.1 kB
Pages: 3
Date: May 13, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Minnesota
Category: Court Forms - State
Author: DeannaD
Word Count: 634 Words, 4,298 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

http://www.courts.state.mn.us/forms/public/forms/Child_Support/Expedited_Process/CSX902.pdf

Download EXPEDITED CHILD SUPPORT PROCESS ( 193.1 kB)


Preview EXPEDITED CHILD SUPPORT PROCESS
State of Minnesota County Select County

District Court Judicial District: Court File Number: Case Type:



In Re the Marriage of:

Plaintiff / Petitioner vs / and Defendant / Respondent Intervenor TO: Other Party: ________________________________________________________________________
First Street Address City State Middle Last Apt. No. Zip



Response to Motion For Review Counter Motion Response to Counter Motion

________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ County Attorney's Office: ________________________________________________________________________
Name of County Attorney

________________________________________________________________________
Street Address

________________________________________________________________________
City State Zip

I,
(Name of person making request)



am responding to the Motion for Review of the Order dated
(Date court order signed)

am responding and filing a Counter Motion to the Motion for Review of the Order dated . am responding to the Counter Motion filed on .
(Date of Counter Motion)

CSX902

State

ENG

Rev 5/08

www.mncourts.gov/forms

Page 1 of 3

(Check each of the following only if they apply to you) Requests 1. I request that the Order be reviewed by (check one):

The Child Support Magistrate who issued the Order A District Court Judge 2.
For the following reasons I do not agree with the changes requested by the other party. A. Page_____ Paragraph _____ Reason it should not be changed or reviewed:

B. Page_____ Paragraph _____ Reason it should not be changed or reviewed:

C. Page_____ Paragraph _____ Reason it should not be changed or reviewed:

D. Page_____ Paragraph _____ Reason it should not be changed or reviewed:

E. Page_____ Paragraph _____ Reason it should not be changed or reviewed:

Attach additional sheets if necessary.

3.

I request that the Child Support Magistrate or Judge issue an amended order. In addition, I would like the order to say:

CSX902

State

ENG

Rev 5/08

www.mncourts.gov/forms

Page 2 of 3

4.

I would like permission to submit new information which I was unable to obtain at the time of the prior hearing. The information I would like permission to submit and the reason it was not previously submitted is:

5.

I request that the Child Support Magistrate or Judge hold a new hearing because:

6.

I have ordered a transcript of the prior hearing. I ordered the transcript from the Court on .

Notice To The Other Party: If a Counter Motion has been served upon you, you have the right to object to the counter motion. If you wish to object, within forty (40) days from service of the original Notice of Filing of your order you must file with the Court Administrator, and serve upon the other party and the county attorney's office, a "Response to Counter Motion". A form entitled "Response to Motion for Review / Counter Motion" is available from the Court Administrator. Acknowledgements by Party Making Motion: a. b. c. d. e. f. Dated: Signature Print Name: Address: City/State/Zip: Telephone: Name of Attorney I am not serving or filing this document for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation. The claims, defenses, and other legal contentions therein are warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law or the establishment of new law. The allegations and other factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, are likely to have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery. The denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence or, if specifically so identified, are reasonably based on a lack of information or belief. The court may impose an appropriate sanction upon the attorneys, law firms, or parties that violate the above stated representations to the court, or are responsible for the violation. I understand that the existing order remains in full force and effect and I must continue to comply with that order until a new order is issued.

CSX902

State

ENG

Rev 5/08

www.mncourts.gov/forms

Page 3 of 3