Free Notice (Other) - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :06-cv-00748-SLR Document 6 Filed 02/14/2007 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
)
GUARDIAN INDUSTRIES CORP. )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) C.A. N0.: 06-748 SLR
)
INNOLUX DISPLAY CORP. )
)
Defendants. )
» )
NOTICE OF LODGING OF WAIVER OF SERVICE
Please take notice that the enclosed Waiver of Service with respect to Defendant Innolux
Display Corp. is hereby lodged with the Court.
Dated: February 14, 2007 /s/ Richard K Herrmann
Richard K. Herrmann (I.D. No. 405)
MORRIS JAMES LLP
500 Delaware Avenue, 15th Floor
Wilmington, Delaware 19801
302.888.6800
rherrmann@morrisj ames.com
Bryan S. Hales
Craig D. Leavell
Meredith Zinanni
Eric D. Hayes
KIRKLAND & ELLIS
200 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(312) 861-2000
Cotmsel for Plaintiff Guardian Industries Corp.

Case 1 :06-cv-00748-SLR Document 6 Filed O2/14/2007 Page 2 of 2
Mr. Tuan I-Ising-Chien
President
Innolux Display Corporation
160 Ke Syue Road
Hsingchu Science Park
Chu-Nan 350, Mi’ao-Li County
Taiwan
Date fj; L Q hda Q
Meredith Zinanni, Esq.
Kirkland & Ellis LLP _
200 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Dear Meredith:
Re: Guardian Industries Carp. v. Innolux Display Corp.
I acknowledge receipt of your request that I waive service of a summons in the action of
Guardian Industries Corp. v. Innolux Display Corp. which is case number 06-748 in the Unitcd
States District Court for the District of Delaware. I have also received a copy of the complaint in
the action, two copies of this instrument, and a means by which I can return the signed waiver to
you without cost to me.
I agree to save the cost of service of a simmons and an additional copy ofthe complaint
in this lawsuit by not requiring that Irmolux Display Corp. be served with judicial process in the
manner provided by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.
Innolugc Display Corp. will retain all defenses or objections to the lawsuit or to the
jurisdiction or venue of the court except For objections based on a defect in the summons or in
the service ofthe summons.
I understand that a judgment may be entered against Innolux Display Corp, if an answer
or motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure I2 is not served upon you within 90 days after
December 12, 2006.
\\5L Et 3 I
. (X ‘ Alas, _ we
Signature Date
Q jigyé ggbgallgfgjs gent for Innolux Display Corp.
G1£v\¤l"¤l C mnwl
'1-vm¤`¢·m< 'P•"5[·>(¤j C-0*-·f·