Free Complaint - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 39.7 kB
Pages: 4
Date: October 27, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 978 Words, 6,109 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/37296/18.pdf

Download Complaint - District Court of Delaware ( 39.7 kB)


Preview Complaint - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:06-cv-00659-GMS Case 2:05-cv-06772-AB

18 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 1 4 Document 1 Filed 12/25/2005 Page 1 of of 4

Frank J. Marcone, Esq. 2530 N. Providence Rd Upper Providence, PA. 19063

Atty ID # 8967 Telephone 610 595 1441 Fax 610 595 1448

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR TH E EASTERN DIST RICT OF PEN NSYLVANIA : : : vs. : : GANDER HILL PRISON: JOHN/JANE DOE : M.D. MEDICAL DIRECTO R, STATE OF : DELAWARE CORRECT IONAL SYSTEM : PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC., WARDEN : GANDER HILL PRISON, COMM ISSIONER, : DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF : DELAWARE, : Defendants : MICHAEL SALIZZONI Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION NO.

jury trial demanded

COM PLAINT

Michael Salizzoni, the Plaintiff herein, by his attorney, Frank J. Marcone, Equire, files this Civil Complaint averring a violation of his Civil Rights under the provisions of 42 U.S.C.A. Section 1983 and others, and in support of his claim for damages resulting therefrom avers the following: 1. Jurisdiction of the Court is based upon a claim being made pursuant to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and more specifically, Section 1983 and others and has resulted in an injury which may be fatal. 2. Michael Salizzoni, the Plaintiff is an individual currently residing at 661 Whiterock Road, Bear Delaware 19701. 3. The Defendants, the Gander Hill Prison, John/Jane Doe, M.D., Medical Director of the State of Delaware Correctional System, Prison Health Services, Inc., Warden of Gander Hill Prison, Commissioner of the Department of Corrections of the State of Delaware are all entities and individuals who maintain their offices at and may be considered residents of the State of Delaware

Case 1:06-cv-00659-GMS Case 2:05-cv-06772-AB

18 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 2 4 Document 1 Filed 12/25/2005 Page 2 of of 4

4. On or about the 23 rd of November, 2002 the Plaintiff, Michael Salizzoni was incarcerated in Gander Hill Prison based upon a warrant which had been filed by the State of New Jersey wherein the Plaintiff was incorrectly alleged to have failed to pay a certain support Order which had originated in New Jersey. 5. At the time of his arrest and incarceration, the Plaintiff was under treatment for Hepatitias C and was being treated at the Veteran's Hospital at Wilmington, Delaware and that treatment required a regimen of chemotherapy which was administered on a daily basis and which consisted of certain medications which were delivered to the Gander Hell Prison for the purposes of providing the continuous treatment during his incarceration. 6. Thereafter, he was taken to court where it was admitted the arrest and incarceration were the result of an error in keeping record of funds which had been paid into the support order. 7. The Plaintiff was ordered to be released from Prison. 8. Instead of releasing the Plaintiff, Gander Hill Prison refused to release him until three days thereafter. 9. Du ring his incarceration he was denied access to the chemotherapy and was thereby deprived of the continuity of the treatment. 10. Upon his release from Gander Hill Prison, the Plaintiff visited with his physician and learned the breach of the continuity in his treatment had resulted in the return of the Hepatitis C as though he did not undergo the treatement. 11. Distressed and annoyed over what had occurred, the Plaintiff determined to delay the return to chemotherapy treatment. 12. Within the last two years, the Plaintiff determined to reinstate treatment and learned the involuntary interruption of his chemotherapy treatment between his incarceration and his release in late December, 2002 has resulted in his losing any further effect from chemotherapy for the interruption has caused him to lose the ability to reinstate the same treatment and has deprived him of the treatment which may have cured his condition. 13. The Plaintiff has been informed the chemotherapy treatment he was receiving had

Case 1:06-cv-00659-GMS Case 2:05-cv-06772-AB

18 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 3 4 Document 1 Filed 12/25/2005 Page 3 of of 4

provided the Plaintiff with an apparent cure and had he been able to complete the treatments the condition, which is fatal, may have been cured. The breach of the treatment resulting in the interruption of treatment has rendered any further treatment ineffective for the chemotherapy treatment was interrupted in such a manner as to render the condition untreatable by further chemotherapy. 14. The Plaintiff was unaware of the serious nature of the condition which resulted from the Gander Hill Prison depriving him of the chemotherapy treatment until he attempted to begin further treatment. 15. The Plaintiff discovered the damage caused by the denial of his chemotherapy treatment within the past two years. 16. The injury cau sed to the Plaintiff resulted from the actions of the above named Defendants in that they conspired to deprive him of his civil right to medical treatment as prescribed by his physician. 17. That deprivation was committed in the conspiratorial acts of the Defendants and were committed under the color of State law. 18. The Plaintiff's physician had contacted the Gander Hill Prison and notified the medical and guard staff that the chemotherapy was critical and had to be provided to the Plaintiff to be effective. 19. The Defendants, acting in concert with each other purposefully, negligently and with an intent to injure the Plaintiff deprived the Plaintiff of his medication after they were notified the continued treatment was necessary and imperative. 20. That the Plaintiff has suffered an injury from the actions of the Defendants and he seeks damages in consideration thereof. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff respectfully prays the court enter a judgment against all the Defendants in an amount in excess of $100,000 and said judgment to be entered both jointly and severally against all named defendants.

Case 1:06-cv-00659-GMS Case 2:05-cv-06772-AB

18 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 4 4 Document 1 Filed 12/25/2005 Page 4 of of 4

Respectfully submitted,

_________________________ Frank J. Marcone, Esq. Attorney for the Plaintiff Michael Salizzoni December 24, 2005