Free Information - Felony - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 64.4 kB
Pages: 2
Date: October 25, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 359 Words, 2,049 Characters
Page Size: 611 x 797 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/37294/1.pdf

Download Information - Felony - District Court of Delaware ( 64.4 kB)


Preview Information - Felony - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:06-cr-00119-GIVIS Document 1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
Plaintiff, )
v. ) Criminal Act. No. 06- I I q
FRANCIS R. MITCHELL, )
Defendant. )
INFORMATION
The United States Attomey for the District of Delaware charges that:
COUNT ONE
On or about April 14, 1999, in the District ofDelaware, Francis R. Mitchell, then a resident of
New Castle County, Delaware, did willfully make and subscribe an individual federal income tax return,
Form 1040, for the calendar year 1998, which was verified by a written declaration that it was made
under the penalties of perjury and was tiled with the Internal Revenue Service, which said Form 1040
he did not believe to be true and correct as to every material matter in that the said Form 1040 stated
that his total income was $230,251, whereas, as he then and there well knew and believed, his total
income was substantially higher, to wit, about $422,597, in violation of Title 26, United States Code,
Section 7206(1).
COUNT TWO
On or about September 1 8, 2000, in the District ofDelaware, Francis R. Mitchell, then a resident
of New Castle County, Delaware, did willfully make and subscribe an individual federal income tax
return, Form 1040, for the calendar year 1999, which was verified by a written declaration that it was
made under the penalties of perjury and was tiled with the Internal Revenue Service, which said Form
F I I. E D
I UCI CI 5 SI I-IY I

Case 1:06-or-00119-GIVIS Document 1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 2 of 2
1040 he did not believe to be true and correct as to every material matter in that the said Form 1040
stated that his total income was $188,418, whereas, as he then and there well knew and believed, his
total income was substantially higher, to wit, about $398,572, in violation of Title 26, United States
Code, Section 7206(1).
COLM F. CONNOLLY
United States Attorney
I /1: J
BY: Ulm?/imwa
Richard G. An rews
First Assistant U.S. Attorney
Dated: O:.-MEJ1/\ 16 il·UO{”
- 2 -