Case 1:06-cv-00441-SLR
Document 7
Filed 08/31/2006
Page 1 of 5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ELIZABETH TRAYNOR, Plaintiff, v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
C.A. No. 06-441
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
DAVY LIU d/b/a DAVY LIU STUDIO GALLERY, Defendant.
DEFENDANT'S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Defendant has insufficient information to admit or deny the averment. Admitted. Denied. Denied. Denied. Denied. COUNT I 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Defendant repeats answers to paragraphs 1-6. Defendant has insufficient information to admit or deny the averment. Denied. Admitted. Denied. Denied. It is admitted that the defendant permitted plaintiff to use space in his gallery to
Case 1:06-cv-00441-SLR
Document 7
Filed 08/31/2006
Page 2 of 5
pursue her own artistic endeavors. Defendant further admits that he agreed that the plaintiff would receive 10% commission on the paintings that she sold. The balance of the averment is denied. 14. 15. 16. Denied. Denied. It is admitted that the plaintiff assisted the defendant in creating promotional
materials for the gallery. The balance of the averment is denied. 17. 18. 19. 20. Denied. Admitted. Denied. It is admitted that the plaintiff took photographs and gave them to the defendant.
It is admitted further that the photographs were shown on the website. The balance of the averment is denied. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. Denied. Denied. Defendant has insufficient information to admit or deny the averment. Defendant has insufficient information to admit or deny the averment. Denied. It is denied that the plaintiff is entitled to any compensation. Defendant has insufficient information to admit or deny the averment. It is admitted that the plaintiff was never an employee of the defendant or his
gallery. The balance of the averment is denied. 29. Admitted.
Case 1:06-cv-00441-SLR
Document 7
Filed 08/31/2006
Page 3 of 5
30.
Defendant has insufficient information to admit or deny the first sentence. It is
admitted that the defendant posted a mission statement and photographs on the website. Insofar as anything else is alleged in the allegation it is denied. 31. 32. 33. Admitted. Admitted. Defendant believes that the infringed upon photographs were removed from the
website, therefore the allegation is denied. 34. The defendant is unable to admit or deny when plaintiff became aware. However,
the balance of the averment is denied. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. Denied. Denied. Denied. Denied. Denied. Denied. Denied. Denied. Denied. Denied. Denied. COUNT II 46. Defendant repeats answers to paragraphs 1-45.
Case 1:06-cv-00441-SLR
Document 7
Filed 08/31/2006
Page 4 of 5
47. 48. 49. 50.
Denied. Denied. Denied. Denied. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
51. 52. 53. 54.
The court lacks jurisdiction over the defendant. Delaware is the improper venue for the case. The complaint fails to state a cause of action. At all times relevant hereto the plaintiff gave photographs to the defendant to post
on his website. The photographs therefore became the property of the defendant.
CASARINO, CHRISTMAN & SHALK
Dated: August 31, 2006
/s/ Stephen P. Casarino STEPHEN P. CASARINO, ESQUIRE I.D. No. 174 800 North King Street, Suite 200 P.O. Box 1276 Wilmington, DE 19899 (302) 594-4500 Attorney for Defendant
Case 1:06-cv-00441-SLR
Document 7
Filed 08/31/2006
Page 5 of 5
CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE I, STEPHEN P. CASARINO, ESQ., hereby certify that I have efiled at 800 North King Street, Suite 200, Wilmington, Delaware on this 31st day of August, 2006 a true and correct copy of Defendant's Answer to Complaint addressed to: Patricia S. Rogowski, Esquire Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP P.O. Box 2207 1007 N. Orange Street Wilmington, DE 19899-2207
CASARINO, CHRISTMAN & SHALK
/s/ Stephen P. Casarino STEPHEN P. CASARINO, ESQUIRE I.D. No. 174 800 North King Street, Suite 200 P.O. Box 1276 Wilmington, DE 19899 (302) 594-4500 Attorney for Defendant