AO 472 (Rev. 3/86) Order of etention Pending lriai
QH `th§tt @‘t‘t
DISTRICT OF
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
V. ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING TRIAL
STEVEN DAVID HUMES
. .... .. . -. . . . .. .. Case Number: O6_83M__MPT
Defendant '
In accordance with the Ball Reform Act. 18 U.S.C.§3142 (f). a detention hearing has been held. l conclude that the following facts
require the detention of the defendant pending trlal in this case.
Part I — Findings of Fact
E (1) The defendant is charged with an offense described in 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) and has been convicted of a (federal
offense) (state or local offense that would have been a federal offense if a circumstance giving rise to federal jurisdiction had
existed) that is
E a crime of violence as defined in 18 U.S.C.§3156(a)(4),
E an offense for which the maximum sentence ls life imprisonment or death.
El an offense for which the maximum term of imprisonment of ten years or more is prescribed in? .
tk
E a felony that was committed after thegendant had bgan convicted of two or more prior federal offenses described in 18
U,S.C.§3142(f) (1) (A)—(C). or comparable state or local offenses.
E (2) The offense described ln finding (1) was committed while the defendant was on release pending trial for a federal, state or local
offense.
E (3) A period of not more than five years has elapsed since the (date of conviction) (release of the defendant from imprisonment) for
the offense described in finding (1).
E (4) Findings Nos. (1 ) , (2) and (3) establish a rebuttable presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably
assure the safety of (an)other person(s) and the community. l further find that the defendant has not rebutted this
presumption.
Alternate Findings (A)
lil (1) There is probable cause to believe that the defendant has committed an offense
Q for which a maximum term of imprisonment of ten years or more is prescribed in . ._ _ .
ij under18 U.S.C.§924(c). ‘
I] (2) The defendant has not rebutted the presumption established by finding 1 that no condition or combination of conditions will
reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and the safety of the community.
J, Alternate Findings (B)
it (1) There is a serious risk that the defendant will not appear.
Er (2) There is a serious risk that the defendant will endanger the safety of another person or the community.
Part it — \\·'ritten Statement of Reasons for Detention
l find that the credible testimony and information submitted at the hearing establishes by (clear e!t_d__cdrEncmg evldei£g(a
preponderance of the evidence) that - ·— ,- Z
- ` --.. .- .- - lll.t..iJ_4
K K K K K KK ‘ Ju 2 U ifs.}; ‘
a X \ e e — - — — -- a tl_.5--J&lSi¥tiET—EUUFti - --
Part III — Directions Regarding Detention U'$Tli·C· Ul U¤.i·*-`*`-ARE
The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney General or his designated representative for confinement in a corrections
facility separate. to the extent practicabie. from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The
defendant shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On order of a court of the United States
or on request of an attorney for the Government. the person in charge of the corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to the United
States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.
D·¤t€¤= \â€Â·'i*8lOt¤ S S _ __
` gzzurzue e/`/r/dirit1/ Ofjitw
Hon. Sue L. Robinson, U. S. District: Judge
_ T Name and Ti//e offzzriiriul O/°fir‘r·r _
`lt‘5&Vt as applicable (a) Controlled Substances Aol 121 U.S.C.§80i et seo ), lb) Controlled Substances import and Export Act (21 LJ.S.C §Q5i Qt seg 1. or
(Ci Section l of Aczt ol Sept t5. (QSO (2i U S.C.§Q5;3a).
United States Free Forms
Canada Free Forms
United Kingdom Free Forms
Australia Free Forms