Free JV-426.v2.092806.xyz.ofm - California

JV-426
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY

TELEPHONE NO.: E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): ATTORNEY FOR (Name):

FAX NO. (Optional):

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF
STREET ADDRESS: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY AND ZIP CODE: BRANCH NAME:

CHILD'S NAME:

FINDINGS AND ORDERS AFTER IN-HOME STATUS REVIEW HEARING-- CHILD PLACED WITH PREVIOUSLY NONCUSTODIAL PARENT
(Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 364, 366.21) 1. In-home status review hearing a. Date: b. Department: c. Judicial officer (name): d. Court clerk (name): h. Party (name): (1) Child: (2) Mother: (3) Father--presumed: (4) Father--biological: (5) Father--alleged: (6) Legal guardian: (7) Indian custodian: (8) De facto parent: (9) County agency social worker: (10) Other (specify): i. Others present in courtroom: (1) Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) volunteer (name): (2) Other (name): (3) Other (name): 2. The court has read and considered and admits into evidence: a. b. c. d. Report of social worker dated: Report of CASA volunteer dated: Other (specify): Other (specify):

CASE NUMBER:

e. Court reporter (name): f. Bailiff (name): g. Interpreter (name and language): Present Attorney (name): Present Appointed today

BASED ON THE FOREGOING AND ON ALL OTHER EVIDENCE RECEIVED, THE COURT FINDS AND ORDERS: 3. a. b. 4. a. b. Notice of the date, time, and location of the hearing was given as required by law. For child 10 years of age or older who is not present: The child received proper notice of his or her right to attend the hearing. may be an Indian child, and notice of the proceeding and the right of the tribe to intervene is The child was provided as required by law. Proof of such notice was filed with this court. There is reason to believe that the child may be of Indian ancestry, and notice of the proceedings was provided to the Bureau of Indian Affairs as required by law. Proof of such notice was filed with this court.
Page 1 of 4 Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California JV-426 [Rev. January 1, 2007]

FINDINGS AND ORDERS AFTER IN-HOME STATUS REVIEW HEARING-- CHILD PLACED WITH PREVIOUSLY NONCUSTODIAL PARENT
(Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 364, 366.21)

Welfare and Institutions Code, §§ 364, 366.21; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.710(h) www.courtinfo.ca.gov American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkflow.com

JV-426
CHILD'S NAME:
CASE NUMBER:

5.

A Court Appointed Special Advocate is appointed for the child.

6. Paternity a. The court inquired of the mother others (names and relationships): as to the identities and addresses of all presumed or alleged fathers. All alleged fathers present during the hearing who had not previously submitted a Statement Regarding Paternity (Juvenile Dependency) (form JV-505) were provided with and ordered to complete form JV-505 and submit it to the court. The clerk of the court is ordered to provide the notice required by Welf. & Inst. Code, § 316.2 to (1) alleged father (name): (2) alleged father (name): (3) alleged father (name):

b.

Advisements and waivers 7. The court informed and advised the mother presumed father other (specify): biological father alleged father legal guardian Indian custodian child

of the following: the right of each parent or guardian and the child to be present and to be represented by counsel at every stage of the proceedings and, if any of the parties is financially unable to retain counsel, any right to appointed counsel that exists, subject to the court's right to seek reimbursement; the right to assert the privilege against self-incrimination; the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses; the right to subpoena witnesses; and the right to present evidence on one's own behalf. 8. The mother presumed father other (specify): biological father alleged father legal guardian Indian custodian child

has knowingly and intelligently waived the right to a court trial on the issues, the right to assert the privilege against self-incrimination, the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, the right to subpoena witnesses, and the right to present evidence on his or her own behalf. Family maintenance services 9. By prior order of the court, the child was removed from the mother presumed father biological father legal guardian Indian custodian other (specify):

alleged father

and placed with a previously noncustodial parent, the biological father mother presumed father other (specify):

JV-426 [Rev. January 1, 2007]

FINDINGS AND ORDERS AFTER IN-HOME STATUS REVIEW HEARING-- CHILD PLACED WITH PREVIOUSLY NONCUSTODIAL PARENT
(Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 364, 366.21)

Page 2 of 4

JV-426
CHILD'S NAME:
CASE NUMBER:

10.

Family maintenance services were ordered for the previously noncustodial parent, and regarding that parent, a. the extent of progress toward eliminating the conditions or factors requiring court supervision has been excellent none minimal adequate substantial b. services offered by the agency to eliminate the conditions or factors requiring court supervision were adequate inadequate c. By a preponderance of the evidence, conditions that would justify the initial assumption of jurisdiction under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 300 still exist or those conditions are likely to recur if supervision is withdrawn. Family maintenance services are continued (1) as previously ordered. (2) as modified (a) on the record. (b) in the case plan. d. Conditions that would justify the initial assumption of jurisdiction under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 300 no longer exist, and those conditions are not likely to exist if supervision is withdrawn. Family maintenance services are terminated.

Reunification services 11. By prior order of the court, reunification services were ordered for mother presumed father biological father other (specify): Regarding that person: a. The extent of progress made toward alleviating or mitigating the causes necessitating the removal has been none b. c. minimal adequate substantial excellent Services offered by the county agency designed to aid in overcoming the problems that led to the initial removal were adequate inadequate Reunification services are (1) terminated. (2) continued (a) as previously ordered. (b) as modified on the record. (i) in the case plan. (ii) The return of the child would not create a substantial risk of detriment to the child's safety, protection, or physical or emotional well-being and is in the child's best interest. The child is ordered returned to the custody of the person. The agency will provide family maintenance services, and the person will participate in the services. The factual basis for this order is as stated on the record. (1) (2) as follows:

d.

Education 12. The right of the legal guardian mother biological father presumed father Indian custodian alleged father other (specify): to make educational decisions for the child is limited as set forth in the Order Limiting Parent's Right to Make Educational Decisions for the Child and Appointing Responsible Adult as Educational Representative--Juvenile (form JV-535) filed in this matter. mother biological father legal guardian other (specify): presumed father Indian custodian must ensure the child's regular school attendance and make reasonable efforts to obtain the education services necessary to meet the child's specific needs. The

13.

JV-426 [Rev. January 1, 2007]

FINDINGS AND ORDERS AFTER IN-HOME STATUS REVIEW HEARING-- CHILD PLACED WITH PREVIOUSLY NONCUSTODIAL PARENT
(Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 364, 366.21)

Page 3 of 4

JV-426
CHILD'S NAME:
CASE NUMBER:

14.

Child 16 years of age or older: The child was in foster care at 16 years of age and is eligible for independent living services. a. The services set forth in the case plan include those needed to assist the child in making the transition from foster care to independent living. b. The services set forth in the case plan do not include those needed to assist the child in making the transition from foster care to independent living. c. To assist the child in making the transition to independent living, the agency must add to the child case plan and provide the services (1) set forth on the record. (2) specified here:

Custody 15. a. Custody of the child is granted as provided in the custody order and final judgment entered this day to the previously noncustodial parent, the mother other (specify): b. The factual basis for this order is as stated on the record. (1) (2) as follows: c. Visitation with the child will be as stated in Visitation Order--Juvenile (form JV-205). d. The clerk of the juvenile court must file with the family court a completed Custody Order--Juvenile--Final Judgment (form JV-200) and Visitation Order--Juvenile (form JV-205). Visitation 16. Contact with the child is ordered as set forth in (check appropriate box and attach indicated form): Visitation Attachment: Parent, Legal Guardian, Indian Custodian, Other Important Person (form JV-400). a. Visitation Attachment: Sibling (form JV-401). b. Visitation Attachment: Grandparent (form JV-402). c. presumed father biological father

17. All prior orders not in conflict with this order remain in full force and effect. 18. Other findings and orders: a. See attached. (Specify): b. The next hearing is scheduled as follows: Hearing date: a. b. 20. Time: Dept: Room:

19.

In-home status review hearing (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 364, 366.21) Other (specify):

The petition is dismissed. Jurisdiction of the court is terminated. All appointed counsel are relieved of the duty to provide further representation. Number of pages attached:

21.

Date:
JUDGE JUDGE PRO TEMPORE COMMISSIONER REFEREE

JV-426 [Rev. January 1, 2007]

FINDINGS AND ORDERS AFTER IN-HOME STATUS REVIEW HEARING-- CHILD PLACED WITH PREVIOUSLY NONCUSTODIAL PARENT
(Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 364, 366.21)

Page 4 of 4