Free Objections - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:06-cv-OO22_8-JJF Document 36 Filed O9/12/2006 Page 1 of 4
In The United States _ Federal District Court
, For the district of Wilmington, Delaware
S Case#lO6—22B—JJF
Herman·Kellp, pro, se I
U I · ‘··‘ ·‘
V S ·
MBNA AmEI"lC& `b&l'1kZ, 913, 3.]. S d m q 7 T
defenders / °a""° —‘ "*· it .%:tttc _o,_c W ott, ,coos
-———----»»-----.-~ - ......»
:;.L
Plaintiff's objection/opposition to defendant mbna america bank's
appearance notice dated Sept 1, 2006. (attached exhibit). _
l. Plaintiff`Hermankelly, pro, se file a motion for default
. against defendant mbna america bank for not answering complaint &
notice of summon.Where mbna is suppose to be a professional bank,
however one of plaintiff's cause of action is that defendants is
making plaintiff spend· more money, time representing this case by
defendants delaying to answer. Mbna got a copy of the complaint
and signed for it from the united states postal service certified mail D
2. Plaintiff object atc defendant notice of appearance from their
attorney Karen V. Sullivan who has full knowledge of this case.
Plaintiff do not owe defendants no money, and.will not pay any more
money to mbna or their attorney .-Defendants started, enticed this l
action & claims.Plaintiff 's object to any defendants's attorney fees.
3. Plaintiff move court & clerk to issue the default judgment S
3 against, also to order that defendants pay all court costs, and any
5 appeal court' s costs, further to reinburse plaintiff t 10,000 for
g this expenses and time working on this-case which defendants ' cause.·
3 . Plaintiff will send the copy of complaints, pleadings as order
by court, to have the us marshall serve defendant mbna again.This
object is in pursuant to all apply laws and FRCPU Plaintiff prays to _
god and this honorable court for any fair relief & to review, ;,; fr ——--
consider these facts and all of plaintiff's menorandum of laws. g XQf%g
datad; `_ ` -€?922h9/Q; respectfully submitted
* ‘ [ Herman Kelly, pro, se
, _ . _ _ _ , , p.o. box l4l57
§§O°;€;_‘;§C@ · l- · · °€I`”°’-HOME ,_ Detroit, Michigan 48214
_____ _ _____ f_ _____ __ _*__________*___ 3l3—»894-8855
Herman Kelly, pro, se plaintiff certified that a true and correct
copy of this obgection was mail by prepaid first class e;USA mail
. to all defendants 's attorneys at; Karen V Sullivan, p.o. box 2054
.., p;,4;o wilmington, DE 19899.. neal levitsky p.o. box 2323
_wilmington, D E. l9899—_2323,-..Ashley Stitzer, p.o. bor25l30
wilmington, D E . l9899. ££ZL£
n a *e?11" *·* *··—
l

f Case 1 :06-cv-00228-JJF Document 36 Filed O9/12/2006 Page 2 of 4
K
OBERLY, JENNINGS & RHODUN DA, P.A. j
1220 Market Street - Suite 710
1-. 0. sox 2054 i
Wilmington, Delaware 19899 I
Charles M. Oberly, III (302) 576-2000
,- Kathleen M. Jennings FM (302) 576·200‘l
William J. Rhodunda, Jr. . . ii‘I‘N°‘ 5l'°3°42°1
_________ Wr1ter’s e-mail [email protected]
Karen V. Sullivan
September 1, 2006
Via CM/ECF . ‘
The Honorable Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. .
‘ United States District Cotut
844 North King Street
Wilmington, DE 19801 _ ‘
. RE: Herman Kelly v. MBNA America Bank, 06-228-JJF
Dear Judge Farnan: - _ I
I write on behalf of Defendant MBNA America Bank, N.A.. ("MBNA"). in response to p
P1aintiff’s Request & Motion for Default Order/Judgment to be Issue{ d] against Defendant
MBNA America Bank (the "Motion”, DJ. 28).1 Yom Honor previously found that “service has
not yet been effected upon the remaining defendant [MBNA] ." (Memorandtun Order dated July
18, 2006, p. 9, D.I. 23,). Since your July 18 Memorandum Order service still has not been
effectuated upon MBNA. Accordingly, MBNA has not defaulted, and the Plaintiff s Motion - I
should be denied.
I am available to answer any questions the Court may have. ‘
Respectfully,
. I _ KAREN V. SULLIVAN .
IKVS. ` .
cc: Herman Kelly (via U.S. mail)
l · MBNA appears only to assert that this Court lacks jurisdiction to enter a default judgment against it. MBNA `
neither consents to jurisdiction nor waives any defenses. ` D0.cg{&—t MO.
_ _ _ ‘ _Datet‘iiee*; &Q

it B llll V F F I -Case 1 :06-cvg0O228Â¥ J A ocument 36 Filed 09/1 006 Page 3 of 4 5
= duwmam STATES POSTAL Sznvipa " ‘ _ 5 I _ -Fd,$,_C,aSS Mai, _ [ . _ `
_ - _ _ _ Postage & Fees Peid { " - ·
_ usps d _ .
LJ ‘ . n A, Permit N0. G—10 h
" ‘ S rider: Please gjrint your meme! eddfess, and ZIP1-4 in this box •‘ - ` _ _ __ i
F ` `EUNITEDSPSTES ,
_ . ' ` . - PUSH!. SERWCE l -
12 W " @">< ’ W 5. ***::dladl¤li.iidi **** '
d 4 0 * 4/ . 5
. DET/[Mx /‘ bgd / /7/V 5 “El§'§}l;,lg§ ,§@§3E,:,999B .
` Store USPS T 41 i
” #9%/ ‘ `
XYL - llkstrj §vs5002 Cgggier BEJTC0 1
Ei?l3»1°f] ii"? Séilliéllitte l
n
0 1 5§d§*‘§“E "“"‘*°°" §§§zS§3é5é55 l
¥:1¢·${.·J.`•» xlgliglllllll§i§tllHill·€l“5HHinlgiiéhiillililaifiglgilii 1 F. It ‘
` ` . l" S BSS . 1
P d »~————~——————-·--—-—.»————¥=-——- - ‘ ` · ~ EEA?-t li1r€a1;i0n: %9g%4
· , - . . e : _ . uz.
it H 30333 5 i,3_ iiiii 5 . .5 5. .5 5 5 . 5 5 _0ii0 _ 5 _i0i0 iii. 0ii_ Aiii_ 5 i.i . ii - P¤5¥¤¤¤ i{¤¤= F11
l2§§lRE?3.‘ 3:%% F 2
in Qomplete items 1, 2, apc! 3. Also complete A. Signature ' ` C t1fjS5R\&IQ§S · 2 40 i
¤ gm;$f¤?:g;;t;:¤D;gZ%$S¤i&?é§cgévedsa ¤*__-gd.; ..._ — , . cQ!4m%“ ` gigxgdddg Riz0ggg?%0?§:0;gg9ég;g§ 1`85 E
m i . . · 1 ._ . E E _ _ . .
¤ Edo?.5};ZZ?J$;i{§d”§Z€$r§Z?.§`S#.°ddd;ddd, °°°""*"*"""*"*°°""*’”°' Jl? *'*’”“"""' d 2. 10:: Am Block PSA 0.50 F
°'°" *"°"'°'“ "°'""‘“"‘ 4 d [ dell dd - ....1;; - dd . · ~ a §¤@stdl·°¢§2 ¤ 60
d, . S E V 8. {6* I’I'·|| . " ..J_; j,_· {4 . , .
1- AmcI?Addm °:i;%iE*`$ tf £,`f§ dl'€$ {4J' iflié @ l
gm'?/U · 152% Subtotal 5.98
é 5 · .· _ ld Total 5.98 3
{O20 ,3617Z/0 3__ de; me we · Cash 50.00
/{,¥’!Ar1//‘g{ )I I _ `Q§d¤d·idd¤ Mdu ggxpddssgmaai H P h di ` Chgggg DUE 44 02
_ egistered etum ecep or .:1erc an ee , `
/ U '¤S¤*¤¤ M¤*' *`J°·°·°· 0 Urder stamps at USPS.c0m/shop ur cal
_ 4. Restricted Delivery? {Extra Fee) Q Ygs l‘800'StElTIHJ24. tu _ _ _
2 AI"tlé2|GNU|'HbB|’ , . F d - d A ..,-- . d _ _. . , jg HlSE31C¤m[%h1cknih1¤ tu printhshtppml
(T"3.l’ISl*€l‘ {FDM SENFCS fHbEI}7&}0c_________________3_Q_'[;_@·A'~;~3'?·f`?5D U _L‘L?_§*”1i'——%'A- Q |
FS FONT! 381 1, February 2004 Domestic Retum Racipt 1.:2595.¤z.|y1-154¤ _ `
A . ..... _... _- ....._ __.. __ _5.. _.... . .d.__ _.__... y._ 5 .... 0 __..i._ i N¤m¤¤·‘ ¤t M5 S¤i¤= 26
— D _ Thank You _
=·· IE Pima °°'“° agml
{E iirnaii.0hi;?iiNq`iEi5i;iraii¢e‘;cqvérage Pr¤w¤ q).:i=;d;di;id·L.;
=·“ _
aj? { l;®Il·§U§(l]§ 0 5, 5§ § § P
ru pumgd s 0.63 UNIT ID: 0206
H Fe · 1
E ud _ Pustmaxk ‘ _
3 lEdd?d§E“.dTé?i“£$l‘S¤E%i 1-85 '*“'° Q _·
¤ ndddmdd ¤d»¤dddd•=d¤ _ Clerk: BMTU0 i —- .
U-, (anuars mantfiequlredl · _ _. 7 _
Q T¤ta1FDs1¤g¤&FBB$- $ thm **5*12/06 _ ` ‘ '
HJ I .
E m€zé’j};&--é.ftd y _ ·.-e . -
P" ;;§'éaa·Qt;;g.QjéTd6?»:Zzi¤Sz<24€2?e - .................... 5 _
ch smigl/"7 d' O . .... .... . ` ` ` · · . ·

"“ ‘‘ " " -. , Case 1:06-cv-00228-JJF Document 36. Filed 09/12/2006 Page 4of4 I
f E ~ V I if
E if ·* Settlement, Release, Contract,Menorandum Of Laws ”f
gi a . . · I I .
5 I _, compromise and settlements are contracts governed by contractual
regal principles, there_fore they must possess all applicable
l so requisitess-An oral agreement may be binding on the parties where
neither party denies having entered the agreement , even `
5 though there is a misunderstanding as to the agreements's effect.
· _see.... zelenka vs; wayne county corp, counsel, 143, mich, app, 567,
5 . 372, nw 2 d, 356, 1985.., Mastaw vs, Nhiukow, 105, Mich, app. 25,
, 306, nw, 2d, 378, I98I.... Rossi vs. Transamerica Car, Leasing Co,
F, 138, Mlch,.app. 807, 3oO, nw, 2d, 307, l98¢. ‘ ‘
. _ ‘ · 1
a _ ‘ I
A civil case may be settled at any time, even after an
$ opinion is rendered by the supreme court, with the consent of all
the part1es._..._see... township of royal oak, vs. City, of pleasant I
? ridge, 307, Mich, 714, I2, nw, 2d. 393, 1943.... \
tl, I I é
[2 it is akiomatic that settlements of disputed matters and compromise I
of unsettled claims are favored by the law over litigation and will
E3, only be voided on satisfactory evidence of mistake, fraud, duress I
1 `" or unconscionable advantage., see.... Podder vs, Kadish, 26, Mich I
-4 __app, 655, 182, NW 2d, 739, 1970... Clinton St. Greater Bethlehem .
,5 ‘ Church .vs. Detroit, 48¢, f, 2 d. 185, 1973 .... `
I Y The parties may validly assent to the settlements of a part of
IG' a controversy, provided the requisties for a complete settlement are
' present. see... Fisher -vs. Burroughs adding Mac , Co, 157, Mich,.E5
18 . ‘ H
However an alleged compromise and settlement may be contested
i9 where one of the parties acted unfairly or oppressively or asserted o
claims while knowing them to be wrongful for the purpose of obtaining
FU the terms. -
5 1 37 Amtjur 2d, & 32 Fraud and Deceit;..,. it is aid to be a
-%gj long standing_ principle of law that where a right of action exists
l" _I,o and the defendant or someone for him by fraudulent representations I
QI. induces the plaintiff to make a settlement or release of his ·
__‘ cause for an inadequate sum, the plaintiff may either avoid the
A settlement or release and sue on his original right of action or he g
,5,_ may sue in fraud and deceit and recover such amount as will
` make the settlement an honest one... automobile underwriters vs.
B R1ch,_22 2 ind, 384, 53, ne, 2d. 775., .
I · ‘ I I I