Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :06-cv-00224-JJF Document 9 Filed O4/17/2006 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
C ; j R b’ A. Crit
_]u@£\(iyRmN1TA/zrgioll It [cdgcs Mdi;gi|l(§jIr§;]];}§(ccnan Judge Robert L._MiIlcr,`J1‘. Eiietgtiiivtx Afltiirtcy
United States District Court United States District Court Umtsd SWWS District (-9***1
Middle District ofFIoric1a Southem District ot'Ncw York N‘“`*h°""' Dtsmcl Ofmdlgna DIRECT REPLY TO:
gg ud . . D_ Lowbn Jonson J“d.5° K*“*“>’" H- Vmlll Michael J. Beck
t_ ` .r so _· . -r U . - United States District Court , , ,
- gvigii tirfiuiitfzifriiiriiciiiiiriirriiiib D"‘""“°'"K“"*” gibc¤i1i:i>¤ibiiiiibl;EbinC1ib¤1b,t I or Judg , b...,.....o ,,.0., Judge David bo. b a~S¤ . b 3’.?oi1;€;g,dot*3n?,¤J’ Frm'
. Unite sbooob District Cobb g;·:,$gggg$=s§,C¤~¤¤* Appeals Room eas;. Noifth Lobby
2 ‘ F Distri zoflvlaryland L W Washington. D.C. 20002
` f 7 i Telephone: E202]l502·2800
·_ y ----— - - =-‘ r at; 202 $02-2sss
E w an ___ J _ _ littp:!!www.jpml.useourts.gov
-— - `“' " April 14, 2006
TO INVOLVED JUDGES
Re: MDL-l783 -— In re JPMorgan Chase & Co. Securities Litigation
Samuel I Hylcmcl et al. v. William B. Harrison, Jr., et ul., D. Delaware, C.A. No. 1:05-162
(Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr.)
Samuel I Hyland v. JPMorgan .S'eew·ilies, Inc., D. Delaware, C.A. No. 1:06-244
(Judge UNASSIGNED)
Stephen Blau v. William B. Harrison, Jr., et al., N-D. Illinois, CA. No. l:04-6592
(Judge William J. Hibbler)
Dear Judges:
Presently before the Panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 is a motion to transfer which includes at
least one action before you in the above-described docket. The parties will have an opportunity to fully
brief the question of transfer and the matter will be considered at a bimonthly Panel hearing session. In
the meantime. your jurisdiction continues until any transfer ruling by the Panel becomes effective.
lf you have a motion pending — such as a motion to remand to state court (ifthe action was
removed to your court) — you are free to rule on the motion, of course, or wait until the Panel has
decided the transfer issue. The latter course may be especially appropriate if the motion raises
questions likely to arise in other actions in the transferee court and, in the interest of uniformity, might
best be decided there if the Panel orders centralization.
Please feel free to contact our staff in Washington with any questions.
Kindest regards,
Wm. Terrell Hodges
Chairman

1 * y' 1 F1 e =
“‘ W 7 7/éO66` |°”
.1 _ cument 9
-cv-00224 JJF D0 &
T
1 ,;...- . Ll!
f ; ¥ :< 1 tif- ‘ 25. @3%
` E Q
1 2i 1 1_ ‘ f'· YT ,,,__
l * ..5 1
2 .. . 1 1. "7 1
¥f "E ‘
1 ·—· ·
* 1 *1-r 1; . » . Z:
s;#%‘·#?·l~?§= 2 `
` =¤ I
1*%. *"=’”€»= E > -5 "`*
· i fapw E1 , IQ "'Z
'· j' _· ..·;.-__1i;_""ga 1 - -;·_ __;
1 15*% #1, E m 1.;
" . ¤— S`. "`: ‘
1 .t -5 *7> Zi '1
1 5) ... ; 2
I1 E L-- tj 0 -· 1`
· W va ;_, 00 ····· ‘
1 E as En .L·. °‘ P: I
1 E U, (Bmw — .1
. E cn mw 1.:
——· — _¤ .5 Q :: 1
—¤ `“ 2 M ’ ····:
.” 4: 5 "" 1
- ¢· u -· ··· 3;: 1
8 ..2 _ 1- 30 -
···-. Q ·-1 ;
i ¤ V? fj 3; 2
I D W 00 3
Q
· 1;-4 1
ij .,1.;
_ ¤ZZl= 1
1 1...* 5
1 1
7 HH ‘
3 1.·Z· I
.¢··
.,u|
Z, •ZlZ*
Q MII!
•-¤ |_’I‘|
I 5 .'···I
i *- gp '
, E g 11
L ·· E 1
1 ,.3 an _
I" >. . . *1 ‘
U g- LQ #» =
,.1 E . £ Q
1 ¤= .2 Z ¤ "F E
1 P·g_g-1
‘ 2 — g .-E
.= Q Tu O S 61 'Q is
» F ¤.» ¤= Z 1 --». 1
1 — ··¤ :: · Q 1
1 "" ca .¤ *0 .:.2 .
1 D LH E In E -:7 J
1; up PI Q ...
Z, = D ' 1-..1 9% *3
Z = 5 .E O 1
1 O E E J2'. 11
·· _. 2 2 S @ 1
1 LQ A 0 M 3 1
1 Z '° ··
1 O
·' ( G
i °·· EL 1
. Q E 1
I S e- 1
1 U |
.1 ·-
1 C1
~ D
·-e