Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 51.2 kB
Pages: 2
Date: June 21, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 372 Words, 2,347 Characters
Page Size: 622 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/36391/9.pdf

Download Letter - District Court of Delaware ( 51.2 kB)


Preview Letter - District Court of Delaware
Case 1 :06-cv-00213-GIVIS Document 9 Filed 06/21/2006 Page 1 of 2
Buchanan lngers oil PC
nttoruvrvs
`ilte Nentours Building
Wmggm D_ Sugggwm 1007 North Orange Street, Suite t110
362 [E28 5523 WÂ¥llT1lftgtDt1, DE 19BO'I-1236
[email protected] E. 302 428 S500
r sez azs seas
wwvubuchananingersoltcom
June 21, 2006
The Hon. Gregory M. Sleet
United States District Judge
United States District Court
for the District of Delaware
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building
844 King Street
Wilmington, DE 19801
Re: Daniel Ferguson v. Garden Ridge Corp., ei al. ·, Case No. 06—CV—~002l3 {GMS)
Dear Judge Sleet: -
Enclosed please find the parties' Second Simulated Order Exieridirzg Briefing Schedule in
the above——captioned matter. The parties respectfully request the entry of this stipulated order,
which modifies the brieting schedule established pursuant to the previously-tiled Srzpulared
Order Extending Briefing Schedule, and which is being proposed by counsel for appellant as a
result of scheduling conflicts. The previous extension was entered as an accommodation to
appe1lees‘ schedule.
The proposed schedule, if approved by Your Honor, would effect a relatively brief
extension ofthe existing deadline for submission of the Opening Brief from the current deadline
of June 2l, 2006, until June 30, 2006. The proposed schedule cnvisages a July 20, 2006 deadline
for submission of the Answering Brief, in order to provide appellees an equivalent time period in
which to review the Opening Brief and prepare their response. The deadline for appellants
Reply Brief is would be extended to August 4, 2006, consonant with the preceding deadlines.
Appellant believes that the proposed extension is necessary to permit the permit the
parties to adequately and effectively brief the complex issues in this appeal, so as to best assist
the Court in its reaching a determination.
Respectfully submitted,
William D. Suliivan
i’ennsylvaini:t rr New York ri Washington, DC cr Florltln 2: New Jersey Z: Delaware 2: Ciilil`()1'!l1i1

Case 1:06-cv-00213—G|\/IS Document 9 Filed 06/21/2006 Page 2 of 2
June 2E, 2006
Page — 2 -
WHS/idl
0052652-0000I
Enciosure
cc: Clerk ofthe District Court (via hand delivery)
Joseph M. Barry, Esq. (via hand delivery)
Pauline K. Morgan, Esq. (via hand delivery)
#769676-vl