Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

C 1 :06- -00059-S ` 03/08/2006 P 1
,.-·=.é~·sf_f`S" °“ L§‘rAf1€3°8t€Bia‘i‘EAvx@i$ii; age O -act,
gf so _;_iff;_.é;= g Disranrmizivr or Josricn Q 6*;;
8 F ¥ : ¤v
*8, » ‘*#-· CARL c. DANBERG *4,, at
)"°*··¤•·“° Attorney General °F DE`}
NEW CASTLE COUNTY KENT COUNTY SUSSEX COUNTY
Carvel State Building 102 West Water Street 114 E. Market Street
820 N. French Street Dover, DE 19904 Georgetown, DE 19947
Wilmington, DE 19801 Criminal Division (302) 739-4211 (302) 856-5352
Criminal Division (302) 577-8500 Fax: (302) 739-6727 Fax: (302) 856-5369
Fax: (302) 577-2496 Civil Division (302) 739-7641 TTY: (302) 856-2500
Civil Division (302) 577-8400 Fax: (302) 739-7652
Fax: (302) 577-6630 TTY: (302) 739-1545
TTY: (302) 577-5783
PLEASE REPLY T0:
March 8, 2006
Civil Division-New Castle County
The Honorable Kent A. Jordan VIA CM/ECF FILING
U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
844 North King Street
Wilmington, Delaware 19801
Re: Humes v. State of Delaware, Court of Common Pleas, et.ol.
C.A. No. 06-59 IO!.]
Dear Judge Jordan:
I am in receipt of Plaintiffs "Letter to the Court fonnally objecting to the motion of
protection being denied,” tiled on March 7, 2006, which the Court has construed as a "Motion for
Reconsideration.” (D.I. 17). Plaintiffs motion appears to be frivolous and the State Defendants
stand on the argument and information already placed in the record during the teleconference with
the Court on February 28, 2006. The Court’s well—reasoned decision, stated verbally at the
teleconference and memorialized in the Court’s Order of March l, 2006 (D.I. I6) was amply
supported by the record before the Court. Plaintiffs motion for reconsideration should be denied.
Please feel free to contact me if the Court requires any additional information.
Respectfully submi
Deputy Attorney General -·
cc: Steven D. Humes (by mail)