Free Acrobat - South Carolina


File Size: 11.2 kB
Pages: 4
Date: August 15, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: South Carolina
Category: Court Forms - State
Author: wclark
Word Count: 438 Words, 3,224 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

http://www.judicial.state.sc.us/forms/pdf/SCACRIIFORM18.pdf

Download Acrobat ( 11.2 kB)


Preview Acrobat
FORM 18 PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court ________ APPEAL FROM GREENVILLE COUNTY Court of Common Pleas George E. Brown, Circuit Court Judge _________ Opinion No. 0000 (S.C. Ct. App. filed Feb. 10, 2002) _________ Stephen L. Doe, as Personal Representative of the Estate of John B. Doe, v. Jane C. Roe, __________ PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI __________ Petitioner.

Respondent,

John E. Smith Post Office Box 123 Greenville, South Carolina 29000 (864) 000-0000 Attorney for Petitioner Other Counsel of Record: Mary P. Jones Post Office Box 456 Greenville, South Carolina 29000 (864) 000-0000 Attorney for Respondent

INDEX Certificate of Counsel ......................................................................................................................1 Questions Presented .........................................................................................................................1 Statement of the Case.......................................................................................................................1 Arguments 1. THE COURT OF APPEALS SHOULD HAVE HELD THAT THIS ACTION IS BARRED BY RES JUDICATA ..............................................................................2 PETITIONER DID TIMELY OBJECT TO THE TRIAL JUDGE=S ERRONEOUS CHARGE ON THE BURDEN OF PROOF ...................................2

2.

Conclusion .......................................................................................................................................2

i CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL

Counsel for petitioner certifies that the Petition for Rehearing was made and finally ruled on by the Court of Appeals on March 2, 2002.

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the Court of Appeals err in holding that this action is not barred by res judicata? Did the Court of Appeals err in holding that petitioner had failed to timely object to the trial judge=s charge on the burden of proof?

2.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE On February 1, 2000, John B. Doe brought this action. . . . [Set forth facts relevant to the questions presented. Counsel may wish to simply give a brief history of the case at this point and set forth the facts in the argument on each question. Reference should be made to where the salient facts can be found in the Record on Appeal (i.e., R.p. 37, lines 7-8).] The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the circuit court. Stephen L. Doe, as Personal Representative of the Estate of John B. Doe v. Jane C. Roe, Op. No. 0000 (S.C. Ct. App. filed Feb. 10, 2002). Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari to review that decision.

1 ARGUMENT

1.

THE COURT OF APPEALS SHOULD HAVE HELD THAT THIS ACTION IS BARRED BY RES JUDICATA. [Set out discussion and citations of authority.]

2.

PETITIONER DID TIMELY OBJECT TO THE TRIAL JUDGE=S ERRONEOUS CHARGE ON THE BURDEN OF PROOF. [Set out discussion and citations of authority.]

CONCLUSION For the reasons stated, petitioner asks the Court to grant the petition for a writ of certiorari. Respectfully submitted,

March 27, 2002

/s/ John E. Smith John E. Smith Post Office Box 123 Greenville, South Carolina 29000 (864) 000-0000 Attorney for Petitioner

2