Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 114.9 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 851 Words, 5,260 Characters
Page Size: 614 x 790 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/35792/9.pdf

Download Letter - District Court of Delaware ( 114.9 kB)


Preview Letter - District Court of Delaware
Case 1 :05-cv-00859-GI\/IS Document 9 Filed O1/20/2006 Page 1 of 2
Youue CONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP
E;;%E%L§Js“°t" iEé;#‘2‘%$E%¥%;““ THE BIMINDYWIIIE BUILDING °“L° S l?;i2;§At§Fti&m
SHELDON SANDLER ROBERT S. BRADY ]()()() WEST STREET ]7TH FLOOR GREcoRYJ. BABCOCK .c$DRE\\` ABLENDGREN
. .\V. · ’ J P M. BARRY . . TTHEW . um
Jpiiggigii C. SISEJTFER WILNIINGTON, DELAWARE 19801 BEACH J0;ERRA.MALEirA>;o
FREDERJCK W. Iossr DANIEL P. JOE-NEON DDNALD J. BO\\'M.·\N, JR ADRJA B. MARTJNELLI
RicRARD H. MORSE CRAIG D. GREAR P.O. BOX 391 Ezuorgv P. CAIR.? i;1cRLAEL WL MFDERMDTT
A ‘ A B T A ·J. *1-{ * . . I r y 'ARA AMMDND OYLE . ARIBETH i INELLA
£>si;i>Ii·iT»i. Agcflibliios BiLE2:bTt~: EEJEANNON WH‘MmGTOr"’ DELM ARE *9899*039* MARGARET M. D1B1A>:cA EDMON L. MORTON
CRAIG A. KARsr<1rz MARTLS S. LESSNER GOA) 5716600 MARY F. DCGAN D. Fox NIL*TTJ\}~lAR.-\—\\’.·\Ll(ER
BARRY M \\’1LLoucREY PACLINE K. MDRGAR _ " ERD: ED\\'AP.DS JENNIFER R. NOEL
JosY W INGERSOLL C. BARR FLJNN (SOO) 2J3-2234 (DE ONLY) KE>.r:Err-1 J. Esos ADAM W. Porr
ANTHONY G. FLYNS NATALIE WOLF FAX; (302) 57T_T 2.53 JAN S. FREDERICKS SETR J. RElDENBERG
JERDME K GRossMA>: LisA B. GOODMAN JAMES J. GALLAGHER MICHELE SRERRETLA
ECGEREA DiPRi>:zio JoR>: W SRAW ·—; §EA·~: T. GREEERER §qi;1;EFORD
. . · L P. .‘.J J. MES P. HCoREs.JR. Y . TEPHANKE ANSEN . . .
itgiigzr L ii·bCiiAsR EDWIN J. HARRDN I 10 W EST PNEFTREET DAM: M. Jo: \VILLlAM D. Joaxsrox Mick-LAEL R. NESTOR P.O. Box :94 R1CH.·\RD S. JULIE Jouw E. TRAEEY
TlMOTH\' J. SNYDER MAUREEN D. LUKE OEORGETOWN DELAWARE Tgga,7 KAREN E. KELLER MARGARET B. WR1rEM.Ax
BRUCE L SJLVERSTEIN Roux P. BJSSELL 7 _ , JENMEER M. Kmxus Si·LARoN M.ZiEc
\V1LL1AM W. BOWSER Scorr A. HOLT (30~) 8’6‘3’7l EDWARD J. Kosaiowsxi
LARRY J. TARABICOS Joax T. DCERSEY (SOO) 255-2234 (DE ORLY)
- ..DL .J. M.B.· LEARY . »
Sirigimo R CHRI§`l§§ DouGL.As WRJGRT FAX (302) *369338 SPECLA1. COUNSEL C SE§OR COLNSEL
. A . G · - » · V I .. J JDM L, ‘ .I.J §Ei§;§§?f£€€§§“ ii»E‘§?tiSéE€%m --II~-II<>¤>¤<¢<>M\~-Ai -<><>>I éi'é§,C.§O£tE§t2§»·’&sr»Y, “
TERESA A CREEK NORxiAw M POWELL KAREN L. PASCALE OF COUNSEL
- . ...\\' Sa BY¢r<
Diner DLAL; (302) sn-sssa *’*“"°‘* 1 “’D°“ E§,§;j*,§D B, g§;X§.ELL_m
DIRECT FAR: (302) 576-3334
[email protected]
January 20, 2006
BY CM/ECF
The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet
United States District Court
844 King Street
Wilmington, DE 19801
Re: ACM Properties, Inc. v. The Ameris Group LLC. C.A. No. 05-859-GMS
Dear Judge Sleet:
I write on behalf of plaintiff ACM Properties, Inc. in response to defendant’s letter
requesting 30 more days to answer the complaint so that it could find counsel. The answer was V
originally due on January 3, 2006 and, after no answer was filed and no request for an extension was
sought, the Court entered an order directing defendant to answer on or before January 18, 2006 (D.I.
7).
This is an action for cyberpiracy, trademark iniingement, and similar claims. Plaintiff is the
owner ofthe AMERUS family of federally registered trademarks, which are used in commerce by
plaintiffs affiliates, including AmerUs Life Insurance Company ("AmerUs Life") in the State of
Delaware. Defendant is using the confusingly similar AMERIS designation for products and
services marketed by AmerUs Life. In fact, defendant’s President and CEO, Ronald Elick, at one
time was an independent agent of AmerUs Life, and we believe defendant began its trademark
infringement at or around the time Mr. Elick’s affiliation with AmerUs Life began. We are seeking
an injunction against defendant’s continued use ofthe AMERIS designation. -
Because defendant’s use of plaintiff s trademarks is likely to be causing confusion about the
source of defendant’s insurance products and services, there is some urgency in moving the case
along. Thus, while we are not opposed in the abstract to a shoit extension beyond the two weeks
already provided in the Cou1t’s January l0, 2006, order (D.I. 7) to enable defendant to find counsel,
we are not agreeable to any extension that delays prompt action in the case. We note in this regard
DB02:5152878.1 0648211001

Case 1:05-cv-00859-Gl\/IS Document 9 Filed O1/20/2006 Page 2 of 2
Yoimo CoNAwAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP
The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet
January 20, 2005
Page 2
that we were contacted last week by a lawyer representing defendant to talk about a non-litigation
resolution ofthe case. ln that conversation we were told that defendant already was in the process —
last week —- of finding litigation counsel in Delaware.
Respectfully submitted,
M/MM (/mj 7%,,9,./4{iz/%r#4¢%F‘i)
ohn W. Shaw (#3362)
JWS/prt
cc; Clerk of the Court (by hand delivery and CM/ECF)
The Ameris Group LLC (by hand delivery)
Frederick L. Vlfhitmer, Esquire (by e-mail)
oaorsiszsvai 06482UOm