Free Mail Returned - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:05-cv-00823-SLR—LPS Document 256 Filed 02/27/2008 Page 1 of 2
{G wm 5. · I l.
1;;; fi;} F•~· f. H f ·
am cm —: J
M ~:r~ H 5-; 1 2 Y
in Ln in- QI!. 1 L f " ` ·
.·~ ams - i IH Z ~ `
_ an E D m ...: .
*·’ m _ 2 0 1
N · #¤ 3 vw -= .
m M4 N cn 0 ez _
Q., u- DEER 1 Z 2 ‘
ri *‘·= -·`-7
- ·=iH@1f=§ E meg m Q ·
@3 0 “°~ ** ·¤ ·
3. G Q Q __, mlm ·¤ -:
:;:3 g °°`* II 0 ¤ ·;> "?: -
C-Q; ... *2**- =,| $3 I- 54 L'.; ·--~ .
...· iw lu gs; J`? D ·· V
-3 kg ZUHJ.} G! Z _
l m ==*” N ud Q?} — g 5 L ` ·
Eg; LO ;;·~ ~:r~ E u__ U :-.1:1 ;» : L
Q;. ,..-1 me ww 6x U) T! wuz an I 0
’ -§;a,~_§`: Lg-- I‘··· EJ"! FE **-*3 ` - -
. . Ta - L
e 6) #2 cz 1 L
XJ Leu "' E;
_ 9 gg d E
% 4 55 ·
_. _....._e. .. .e—-- —_ II m ·
. i n E §==z · .
‘ :Z··’ ‘ an #@5 L 2
I :~ c"-] §c3g_u . _ »S'1i ` v
» . ¤0~ ¤~— igse
- H Q cd 1;:: _
{ Ei; _* m 4;§Q - _
' Ly BJ QQ {If
E 0 E
. . - . O Q I
'2 :2 *3 3 0
`5 Z x e i 0 ‘
Q S ¤— #— *5 §
¤ O1 my Q ,
w Ei c #4: - *5 O a
s-r "' lf) "U E O {D K E
~¤w E mmwm a —
g Q •-1 : *
.0 <:»
x U gg no .
B ,. 0 GN _ `
I` »-1 U G ’—' cn ` .
U `E Q =¤ S - F `
aa ,. L4 Z
GJ as CE 5 ., § -_
,= Q QJ B D V .\
_ aa QJ N m 4;
** =¤ ~`= w é ii \
c 3 U} Q Q . L M1 ‘·
U N gg LL.
. U as ¤ ··· u. I}
{:1 U3 »-1 = O V. Q "
°"' *1: M 3 0 0 0
O E Z -
¤ 3 E g
aq

Case 1:05-cv-00823-SLR—LPS Document 256 Filed 02/27/2008 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
GEORGE A. JACKSON, etal., )
I
Plaintiffs, )
I
v. ) Civ. N0. 05-823-SLR/LPS
I
STANLEY TAYLOR, )
et al., )
I I
Defendants. )
ORDER REGARDING REFERENCE
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 636
At Wilmington this ll‘H— day of February, 2008, the above case having been
reassigned from the vacant judgeship caseload;
IT IS ORDERED that the case is hereby referred to Magistrate Judge Leonard P.
Stark. Consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 635(b), Judge Stark shall conduct all proceedings,
and hear and determine all motions] through and including the pretrial conference?
The above caption shall be used in all subsequent filings in this action.
United States gstrict Judge
‘Dispositive motions by report and recommendation; nondispositive motions by
order (either written or issued from the bench).
2With respect to discovery disputes, the court’s Electronic Discovery Default .
Standard and Default Standard for Access to Source Code shall continue to be
applicable.