Free USCA Letter to District Court Clerk - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:05-é{@78@IGS 3%%-3 ( &702¢2Q{6g Page1 of 4
4 {JY U 7p 727}*;/ COO/Zz [7-
7/
E (G E H W E ®
i
MAY — E
` V / { A •"
@"”"”’/WM J; ”’” u.s.c.A.zm.c1R
yy.
@7/WAJ 0 ”·’Z 6—”‘”4’” c’»Z»7¢¢»’»9” ”%’·( Of-?/7-6My
%”/ /4&$/”7 67777/z /6r `l_
HC 02*r .@Cé·&—/ev/’g
x7.»n7z/ 52fc/ Jzyfzé/f 7C277·4 ·f%; 4/.74/— yy! ,44.¢r¢4 9; 2605
4/ 7%¤ 07r/7?/ 2”7Z#>‘¢J .97}%/,2% :’.7vr@' pvc! Z.; /7. uw; ,
7%/Lv A7/6J 7é’%477 7%¢ 7é·,77;¢/ .7/ why WF
@7 fznyéwaxfyj Km7>»·»L /}.4/gJ’¢/ 4 fc//>·6.»7¢¢ A7 gégn
V,/QA-;/Q/7 M 7/% .p¢é¢—/K/6 /* 6*/I OF Kaéé 4/70/ %'7¢
é 7p 7;% 1;.7énY ,:77/ :744.; g0”,r7¢7¥¤»4Q77, V
A/4/6%- L-/ly by L//`/72 Q7: ggfbé/if 667/&d 0%
7L} cfg j/vvhaf,
/?¢§y¢¢Z_6,6¢ ..S"y(7»7/#2iQ
. 7/ ‘ A
//$’//#»,¢//»w<* F7:-{ 79. an
’”‘/“""" EF 77777

Case 1 :05-cv-OO817—G|\/IS Document 9-3 Filed 05/O2/2006 Page 2 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT A
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
DAMMEYIN A. JOHNSON, )
Petitioner, g
v. l Civil Action No. 05-817-GMS
THOMAS CARROLL, l
Warden, and ATTORNEY GENERAL )
FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE, )
Respondents. 3
O R D E R
At Wilmington this _&_}__rg)ay of March, 2006;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
l. Petitioner Dammeyin A. .Iohnson’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus iiled
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DISMISSED and the writ is DENIED as second or
successive. (D.I. 1.) The instant petition is .Iohnson’s second habeas challenge to his
1999 conviction. The court denied Johnson’s first § 2254 petition on the merits. See
Johnson v. Snyder, Civ. A. No. Ol-278-GMS, Mem. Order (D. Del. Dec. IO, 2003).
I Consequently, because Johnson has filed the instant petition without first obtaining
permission from the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, the court does not have the
authority to review the petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(l); Robinson v. Johnson, 313
F.3d l28, 139 (3d Cir. 2002)(holding that when a second or successive habeas petition is
erroneously filed "in a district court without the permission of the court of appeals, the

Case 1 :05-cv-OO817—Gl\/IS Document 9-3 Filed 05/O2/2006 Page 3 of 4
district court’s only option is to dismiss the petition or transfer it to the court ofappeals i
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 163l.").
2. Johnson has failed to make a “substantial showing ofthe denial ofa
constitutional i·ight,” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), and a certificate ofappealability is not
warranted. See United States v. Eyer, 113 F.3d 470 (3d Cir. 1997); 3rd Cir. LAR 22.2
(2002).
3. Pursuant to Rule 4, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254, the clerk shall foithwith seive a
copy ot` the petition and this order upon: (1) the above—named warden of the facility in
which Johnson is housed; and (2) the Attorney General for the State of Delaware.
4. The clcrk shall also send a copy of this order to Johnson at his address on
record.
`

` Case1:O5-cv-00817-GMS Document 9-s Filed 05/O2/2006 Pagemrt,4 H U U, E
` _ 5 as Q
` § r-· E :4:};
"U \
5 é E ¤ Q
¤ E bu °\ Q
* E Q Q °?
E ¤ ¤ N Q
S Q? 5 w ¤
EE @ E ¤
2 2 s
:`· @ H y
" Q
Q R7 \
DU 4
rm Q Q §
» M \ 3
»: K § R? ~
r (Q n& x`
Y <€
si Q E u Q `
. K §\\ xi ~
w
Rx \ Q ff
;. §= Q? {ji E
... °‘\ $9* ., _, T P"?
5 W Q _ ., _·’
.~ . ` R N,
E \ \ #4
E W ,. . ‘ ‘ E; » F:
_
"` g
ii Y w
gz-; § -4 <.1
if w ____; ©
fc.! ' I A -C Q
~— m
FL Q A 3;
”" ‘\~—~T”’ rf ;
» -—»~ E
~ . ,. H", ..,_ ,.______N______ ,
\