Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

. . Case 1 :05-md-O171[7NJIJIFED §pg1.irR§nj@B[CI AE IFQLIQE/E4/2008 Page 1 of 3
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
CHAIRMAN: MEMBERS: _ DIRECT REPLY TO:
Judge John G. Heyburn II Judge D. Lowell Jensen Judge Kathryn Yratil
United States District Court United States District Court Upltgd States DlStfl€t C0l1rt Jeffery N. Luthi
Western Distriet of Kentucky Northern District ol` California District of Kansas Clerk of thc Pancl
_ One Columbus Circle, NE
Judge J. Frederick Motz Jndgc David R. Hansen Thtrrgood Marshall Federal
United States District Court United Statcs Court of Appeals Judiciary Building
District of Maryland Eighth Circuit Room G-255, North Lobby
_ _ Washingto1|,D.C. 20002
Judge Robert L. Miller, Jr. Judge Anthony J. Scirrea
United States District Court United States Court of Appeals Telephone: [202] 502-2800
Northern District of Indiana Third Cireuit Fax: [202] 502-2888
http://www.jpmI.useonrts.gov
March 19, 2008
Peter T. Dalleo, Clerk
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Bldg.
Lockbox 18
844 North King Street
Wilmington, DE 19801-3 570
Re: MDL No. 1717 -— IN RE: Intel Corp. Microprocessor Antitrust Litigation
(See Attached CTO—4)
Dear Mr. Dalleo:
I am enclosing a certified copy and one additional copy of a conditional transfer order filed by the
Panel in the above-captioned matter on March 3, 2008 . As stipulated in Rule 7.4(a) of the Rules of
Procedure of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 199 F .R.D. 425, 435-36 (2001), transmittal of
the order has been stayed 15 days to give any party an opportunity to oppose the transfer. The 15-day
period has now elapsed, no opposition was received, and the order is directed to you for filing.
The Panel‘s governing statute, 28 U.S.C. §l407, requires that the transferee clerk "...transmit a
certified copy ofthe Panel‘s order to transfer to the clerk of the district court from which the action is being
transferred."
Counsel for plaintiff is listed below.
Very truly,
SEINIGER LAW OFFICES, PA [ [,:3:;
Philip H. Gordon, Esq. Jeffery N. Ltithi
GORDON LAW OFFICES Clerk ofthe Panel
623 West Hayes Street fj
Boise, ID 83702-5512 __ {Y · _ `.;:··
’.`..i_4"z{ Ma JQM _—_q
l Cl k
Deputy er rz`?
Attachment M
cc: Transferee Judge: Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr.
Transferor Judge: Judge Edward J. Lodge
Transferor Clerk: Cameron S. Burke
JPML Form 36

Case 1 :05-md-01717-JJF Document 831 Filed O3/24/2008 Page 2 of 3
_ - JUDICIAL PANEL ON
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
A CERTIFIED TRUE COPY
g HAR -3 2008
_ ITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL FILED
lll£lH I 9 2003 on ci.Eai<·s or=r=icE
. A MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
mgs I
FOR T E ILIDICIAL PANEL 0
MIIIJWIIHR ¤ · .» L ‘ rt: · o cnomocrrsson
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Seiniger Law Offices, PA v. Intel Corp., )
D. Idaho, C.A. No. 1:08-31 ) MDL No. 1717
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-4)
On November 8, 2005, the Panel transferred ten civil actions to the United States District Court for
the District of Delaware for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1407. See 403 F.Supp,2d 1356 (J .P.M.L. 2005). Since that time, 25 additional actions have been
transferred to the District of Delaware. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been
assigned to the Honorable Joseph J. Faman, Jr.
It appears that the action on this conditional transfer order involves questions of fact that are
common to the actions previously transferred to the District of Delaware and assigned to Judge
Farnan.
Pursuant to Rule 7.4 of the Rules of Procedure of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 199
F.R.D. 425, 435-36 (2001), this action is transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the District of
Delaware for the reasons stated in the order of November 8, 2005, and, with the consent of that court,
assigned to the Honorable Joseph J. Faman, Jr.
_ This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk ofthe United States
_ District Court for the District of Delaware. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed
15 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk ofthe Panel
within this 15-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.
ANEL:
‘· .» I - _..-
_ 1 ee·e· e
" Jeffery N. Luthi
h as no obiection is Clerk of the Panel
at this time. th¤ -
stay is lifted.
llllilli 1 9 2008
LEFlK'S OFFICE
JSDICIAL PANEL ON
MULTIDISTHICT LITIGATION

· A I » Case 1 :05-md-01717-JJF Document 831 Filed O3/24/2008 Page 3 of 3
JUDICIAL PANEL ON
MULTIDISTFIICT LITIGATION
MAR ··3 2008
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL FILED
vn CLEFIK'S OFFICE
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
IN RE: INTEL CORP. MICROPROCESSOR
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Seiniger Law Offices, PA v. Intel Corp., )
D. Idaho, C.A. No. 1:08-31 ) MDL No. 1717
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-4)
On November 8, 2005, the Panel transferred ten civil actions to the United States District Court for
the District of Delaware for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1407. See 403 F.Supp.2d 1356 (J .P.M.L. 2005). Since that time, 25 additional actions have been
transferred to the District of Delaware. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been
assigned to the Honorable Joseph J. Farnan, Jr.
It appears that the action on this conditional transfer order involves questions of fact that are
common to the actions previously transferred to the District of Delaware and assigned to Judge
Farnan.
Pursuant to Rule 7.4 of the Rules of Procedure ofthe Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 199
F.R.D. 425, 435-36 (2001), this action is transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the District of
Delaware for the reasons stated in the order of November 8, 2005, and, wit.h the consent of that court,
assigned to the Honorable Joseph J. Farnan, Jr.
g This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office ofthe Clerk of the United States
District Court for the District of Delaware. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed
15 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk ofthe Panel
within this 15-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.
OR ANEL:
‘· .·-‘ - -—
Jeffery N. Ltithi
inasmuch as no objection is Cluk of the Panel
pending at this time, the
stay is lifted.
llllllli I 9 2008
CLEFIK'S OFFICE
JUDICIAL PANEL ON
MULTIDISTHICT LITIGATION