Free Order on Motion for Reconsideration - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:05—cv—00684-*** Document 23 Filed 08/18/2006 Page1 of2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
In re ) Chapter 13
PHILLIP A. DYE, g Bank. Case No. 05-11619 JKF
Debtor. g
——;t j
PHILLIP A. DYE and REBECCA J. DYE, )
Appellants, g
v. g Civil Action No. 05-684-KAJ
TRUSTEE NIICHAEL B. JOSEPH, g
Appellee. g
MEMORANDUM ORDER
On July 28, 2006, the Bankruptcy Court’s Dismissal of Mr. Dye’s ("Dye") case
was affirmed. (Docket Item ["D.I."] 15.) On August 3, 2006, Dye filed a "Notice of
Adjudicative Facts of Void Order Petition-Demand To Correct The Wrong" and "Notice
of Adjudicative Facts of Void Order Ab Initio Petition—Demand to Correct the Wrong"
(D.I. 19, 20), in effect requesting reconsideration of the July 28 ruling.
"[A] court may only grant reconsideration if there is: (1) a change in the
controlling law; (2) newly available evidence; or (3) the need to correct a clear error of
law or fact to prevent manifest injustice. Max's Seafood Cafe v. Quinteros, 176 F.3d
669, 677 (3d Cir. 1999)." Dye fails to assert any change in the controlling law, newly
available evidence, or a clear error of law that would cause injustice.

, Case 1:05—cv—00684-*** Document 23 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 2 of 2
The request for reconsideration is therefore DENIED.
M l S x ..
i ` 6 4//Ot/--\
UN TED STA ES ISYRICT JUDGE
August 18, 2006 _/
Wilmington, Delaware
2