Free Judgment - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:05-cv-00608-MPT
Case 1:05-cv-00608-MPT

Document 392
Document 391-2

Filed 03/31/2008
Filed 03/27/2008

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

)

CROWN PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND CROWN CORK & SEAL USA, INC., PLAINTIFFS,
V.

)
)
)

)

)
) ) )

CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-608 (MPT)

REXAM BEVERAGE CAN CO., DEFENDANT.

)
)

)
)

Plt8POSIBB ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT At Wilmington, this &, day of March 2008 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT:
1. This action for patent infringement arises under the Patent Laws of the United

States, Title 35 of the United States Code. Subject matter jurisdiction is conferred on this Court by 28 U.S.c. §§ 1331 and 1338(a). 2. The Court has personal jurisdiction over the parties and venue in this Court is

proper under 28 U.S.c. §§ 1391(b) & (c), and 1400(b). 3. On October 18,2005 Crown Packaging Technology, Inc. and Crown Cork & Seal

USA, Inc. filed a Second Amended Complaint against Rexam Beverage Can Co. alleging infringement of U.S. patent nos. 6,848,875 and 6,935,826. (D.l. 16) 4. On November 3,2005, Rexam filed an Answer to the Second Amended

Complaint and asserted counterclaims alleging infringement of U.S. patent nos.4,774,839; 5,222,385; 5,697,242; 6,129,230 and 6,260,728 by Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. (DJ. 17)

Case 1:05-cv-00608-MPT
Case 1:05-cv-00608-MPT

Document 392
Document 391-2

Filed 03/31/2008
Filed 03/27/2008

Page 2 of 3
Page 2 of 3

5.

On September 11,2006, the parties consented to the jurisdiction ofthe United

States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.c. § 636 (c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72 to conduct all proceedings and enter an order ofjudgment. (D.l. Ill) 6. On January 25,2007, Rexam moved for partial summary judgment of invalidity

and non-infringement of Crown's U.S. patents 6,848,875 and 6,935,826. (D.l. 209) 7. On January 18,2008, by a covenant not to sue Rexam, Crown withdrew its

assertion of infringement of claims 32, 33, 50, 51 and 52 of U.S. patent no. 6,848,875 and of claim 13 of U.S. patent no. 6,935,826 leaving Crown's assertion of infringement of U.S. patent no. 6,935,826 limited to claim 14 and Crown's assertion of infringement of U.S. patent no. 6,848,875 limited to claim 34. (D.l. 366) 8. In a Memorandum Order dated January 22, 2008, the Court granted Rexam's

motion in part holding: (a) that claim 34 of Crown's U.S. patent 6,848,875 was invalid under 35 U.S.c. §112, ,-rl; (b) that Rexam' s motion for summary judgment of inval idity with regard to other claims of Crown's U.S. patent nos. 6,848,875 and 6,935,826 was moot; (c) that the "Rexam End" does not infringe claim 14 of U.S. patent 6,935,826; and (d) that Rexam' s motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of other claims of Crown's U.S. patent nos. 6,848,875 and 6,935,826 was moot. (D.l. 370) 9.

It is now finally adjudicated that claim 34 of U.S. patent 6,848,875 is invalid

under 35 U.S.C. §112, ,-rl and that claim 14 of U.S. patent 6,935,826 has not been infringed. 10. Pursuant to a Settlement Agreement between the parties, effective March 17,

2008, Rexam's counterclaims against Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. for infringement of U.S. patent nos. 5,222,385; 5,697,242; 6,129,230 and 6,260,728, are dismissed with prejudice.

2


Case 1:05-cv-00608-MPT
Case 1:05-cv-00608-MPT

Document 392
Document 391-2

Filed 03/31/2008
Filed 03/2712008

Page 3 of 3
Page 3 of 3

11.

The Court retains jurisdiction over the disputes arising out of or in connection

with the Settlement Agreemen 12. 13.

J which

is incorpocated herein by reference.

Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. This Order is a final judgment.

~~
E

STATES MAGIS~GE

3