Free Order on Motion to Amend/Correct - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 51.6 kB
Pages: 2
Date: October 10, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 318 Words, 1,884 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/35278/55.pdf

Download Order on Motion to Amend/Correct - District Court of Delaware ( 51.6 kB)


Preview Order on Motion to Amend/Correct - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:05-cv-00576-JJF Document 55 Filed 10/10/2006 Page1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
DARREN LAMONT SEAWRIGHT and )
DANIEL M. WOODS, )
Plaintiffs, g
v. ) Civ. N0. 05-576-KAJ
WARDEN RAFAEL WILLIAMS and ;
MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR )
PACECO, )
Defendants. g
ORDER
Now before me is a "motion to request a supplemental complaint to add
defendants and a plaintiff to original complaint filed" and a motion for leave to proceed
in forma paupens filed by movant William J. Webb, Jr. (D.I. 47, 51.) This case was
filed by plaintiffs, Darren L. Seawright ("Seawright") and Daniel M. Woods (“Woods"),
who proceed pro se, and are inmates housed in Delaware Department of Correction
institutions. Woods requests that the complaint be amended to add fellow inmate,
William J. Webb ("Webb") as a plaintiff. Only Woods signed the pending motion.
As a non-attorney, Woods may not act as an attorney for other individuals. See
In the Matter of Chojecki, Nos. 99-4850, 99-18145, 2000 WL 6790000, at * (E. D. Pa.
May 22, 2000) (citing United States v. Stepard, 876 F. Supp. 214, 215 (D. Ariz. 1994)
("Although a non-attorney may appear in propria persona on his own behalf, that
privilege is personal to him and he has no authority to appear as the attorney for
anyone other than himself.") See also Jordan v. De/aware, 433 F. Supp. 2d 433, 439
(D. Del. 2006).

Case 1:05-cv-00576-JJF Document 55 Filed 10/10/2006 Page 2 of 2
Plaintiffs are admonished that filings relative to the rights of all plaintiffs are to be
signed by all plaintiffs. lf they are not, the filings will be stricken.
THEREFORE, I am denying the motion to amend the complaint (D.I. 47). I am
also denying without prejudice, as moot, movant William J. Webb. Jr.’s application to
proceed in forma pauperis. (D.|. 51.) W ll
U TED STATES ISTRIICT JUDGE
DATED: {f»{/©/ 6% J
-2-