Free Answering Brief in Opposition - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 87.7 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 494 Words, 2,927 Characters
Page Size: 614 x 790 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/34820/205.pdf

Download Answering Brief in Opposition - District Court of Delaware ( 87.7 kB)


Preview Answering Brief in Opposition - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:05-cv-00292-JJF Document 205 Filed 06/O2/2006 Paget of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
p FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAVVARE

Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant,
Vi T Civil Action No. 05-292 (JJF)
TATUNG COMPANY;
TATUNG COMPANY OF AMERICA. INC.;
CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES. LTD.;
AND VIEWSONIC CORPORATION,
Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs.
PLAINTIFF LG.PHILIPS LCD CO., LTD.’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
FOR CONTINUANCE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE DATE
Plaintiff LG.Philips LCD Co.. Ltd. ("LPL") hereby responds to Defendants’ Motion for
Continuance of Pretrial Conference Date (D.I. 204l)(the "Motion"):
(1) LPL did not join in the Motion because the Court obviously selected and set the
date for the pretrial conference (June 16. 2006) in relation to the start of the trial (July 17, 2006).
The Court has told the parties repeatedly that the trial date is firm. LPL does not wish in any
way to jeopardize the commencement of trial on July 17. 2006. LPL is preparing to exchange
documents so that the pretrial conference can proceed as scheduled.
V (2) The scheduling of the pretrial conference is a matter for the Court’s discretion. If
the Court wishes to postpone the pretrial conference (without affecting the commencement of
trial) then. of course, LPL would not object. However. LPL respectfully suggests that. if the
Court is inclined to postpone the pretrial conference at all (without affecting the commencement
of trial). that it be held not later than June 30. 2006.

Case 1:05-cv-00292-JJF Document 205 Filed 06/O2/2006 Page 2 of 3
June 2, 2006 THE BAYARD FIRM
’ . /s/ Richard D. Kirk (RKO922)
222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 900
P.O. Box 25130
Wilmington. DE 19899-5130
(302) 655-5000
V r1 Counsel for Plaintiff
LGPHILIPS LCD CO., LTD.
OF COUNSEL:
Gaspare J. Bene I
Matthew T. Bailey
Cass W. Christensen
McKenna Leng & Aldridge LLP
1900 K Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006
(202) 496-7500
626969vl
1

Case 1:05-cv-00292-JJF Document 205 Filed 06/O2/2006 Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned counsel certifies that, on June 2, 2006, he electronically filed the
foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECP, which will send
V automatic notification of the filing to the following:
Robert W. Whetzel, Esq.
Matthew W. King, Esq.
Richards, Layton & Finger
One Rodney Square
P.O. Box 551 .
Wilmington. DE 19899
The undersigned counsel further certifies that copies ofthe foregoing document
were sent on June 2, 2006 by email and by hand to the above counsel and by email and
first class mail to the following non—registered participants:
Christine A. Dudzik, Esq. Teresa M. Corbin, Esq.
Thomas W. Jenkins, Esq. Glenn W. Rhodes. Esq.
Howrey LLP Julie Gabler. Esq.
321 North Clark Street Howrey LLP
Suite 3400 525 Market Street
Chicago. IL 60610 Suite 3600
San Francisco. CA 94105
/s/ Richard D. Kirk grk0922l
Richard D. Kirk
(>U23S0vl