Free Order on Motion to Seal - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 56.4 kB
Pages: 1
Date: October 1, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 364 Words, 2,700 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/9951/132.pdf

Download Order on Motion to Seal - District Court of Connecticut ( 56.4 kB)


Preview Order on Motion to Seal - District Court of Connecticut
t,,,_ _,__ _?_,.,,.;..._ -.._.......—...L.........Y ,—· .·....—-·;
//Q2se 3:00-cv-O1050—AVC Document 132 Filed O9/30/2004 Page 1 of 1 i
•»-··""""T-T i
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT n Q N, ,..,,3 i
FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUTYTY ‘ ’ _ ij `I
_,_ __ rt ·»_t at 1
MARY CARR, er. al., ) I-ju ‘~-~· `· ./‘ i
Plaintiffs, ) CIVIL ACTIONNOP. - Q _ “
_ ) 3:00 CV_1Z0_§0 (AWTS {gy I- I‘`i
V- ) `"`J
_ ) OCTOBER 8, 2003 i
PATRICIA WILSON-COKER, in her ) i
official capacity as Commissioner of the State ) CLASS ACTION i
of Connecticut Department of Social Services, )
Defendant. )
)
. MOTION TO SEAL PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY TO DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TQ
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ATTACHED
EXHIBIT A
AND REQUEST TO FILE REDACTED VERSIONS FOR THE PUBLIC RECORD
Plaintiffs move that Plaintiffs’ Reply to Defendant’s Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for
Partial Summary Judgment and attached Exhibit A thereto be sealed. A request to file, fort the
public record, redacted versions Plaintiffs’ Reply to Defendant’s Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion
for Partial Summary Judgment (“Plaintit`fs’ Rep1y") and attached Exhibit A thereto is part of this
Motion to Seal. In support of this motion, Plaintiffs represent the following:
1. Plaintiffs and Defendant have entered protective orders, approved by the Court, with
the following non—parties to this action: Dental Practice Association of Connecticut, Inc. dibfaf
BeneCa1·e, Inc. (approved August 10, 2001); Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Connecticut, F
Inc. (approved August 20, 2001); Health Net ofthe Northeast, Inc. (approved September 28,
2001); Comhitinity Health Network of Connecticut, Inc. (approved August 10, 2001); and Dental
Benefit Prowdders, Inc. (approved November 15, 2002). The orders were previously tiled with
the,Court uly 18, 2003 with Plaintiffs’ Motion to Seal Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs’
GRANTED. lttasccrdsmd.
Allin W. Thompson, U.S.D.J.
H’{l·C¢i",` N _ t‘*l‘$° ht
‘ ‘ r_._ ( _ _ "*““= *7*** - - - .,I_ ,_.1_ ,_ : _' _ _ _' __ _ i___ _i G E iis sgni
;_,_v—;’— v__- V - T _ T _ A T I T V "r-**·7¥¤¥%.hi'*"" · 1r·¤:j_‘LT`_",;;`j{;_.;.._._; ;_
——111____ T ```` T T TTT TT T T ’ P -. - ae-.» ;— ~ . .

- T - T - 7 "--r` _ U "--UVYJRARTFT"-' · : -··j·’:Q·]`,LQj:'_`_;., _r. _;
_ qq-=-;=-¤= .- _.