Free Answer to Amended Complaint - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 64.4 kB
Pages: 10
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 2,322 Words, 14,271 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/9944/52.pdf

Download Answer to Amended Complaint - District Court of Connecticut ( 64.4 kB)


Preview Answer to Amended Complaint - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:00-cv-01043-JCH

Document 52

Filed 05/13/2005

Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT NITOR V. EGBARIN and JANET J. EGBARIN Plaintiffs, v. LEWIS, LEWIS & FERRARO, LLC, SCOTT F. LEWIS, CLAUDE J. PICARD and PAULINE M. PICARD Defendants. : : : : : : MAY 12, 2005 CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:00-cv-01043-JCH

ANSWER OF DEFENDANTS LEWIS, LEWIS & FERRARO LLC AND SCOTT F. LEWIS TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT I. PRELMINARY STATEMENT 1. II. As to the allegations of paragraph 1, the plaintiffs are left to their proof.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2. 3. 4. 5. As to the allegations of paragraph 2, the plaintiffs are left to their proof. As to the allegations of paragraph 3, the plaintiffs are left to their proof. As to the allegations of paragraph 4, the plaintiffs are left to their proof. The allegations of paragraph 5 are admitted.

III.

PARTIES 6-7. 8-9. As to the allegations of paragraphs 6 and 7, the plaintiffs are left to their proof. Those portions of paragraphs 8 and 9 which allege that these defendants

regularly engaged in debt collection are denied; the remaining allegations of paragraphs 8 and 9 are admitted.

One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103

Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105

Case 3:00-cv-01043-JCH

Document 52

Filed 05/13/2005

Page 2 of 10

10-11. As to the allegations of paragraphs 10 and 11, the plaintiffs are left to their proof. IV. FACTS 12-34. As to the allegations of paragraphs 12-34, the plaintiffs are left to their proof. 35. 36. The allegations of paragraph 35 are denied. That portion of paragraph 36 which alleges that these defendants drafted a

document entitled "Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement" is admitted; the remaining allegations of paragraph 36 are denied. 37-43. As to the allegations of paragraphs 37-43, the plaintiffs are left to their proof. 44-46. The allegations of paragraphs 44, 45 and 46 are denied. 47-48. As to the allegations of paragraphs 47-48, the plaintiffs are left to their proof. 49. As to the allegations of paragraph 49, it is admitted that a closing took place on

May 31, 1994; as to the remaining allegations, the plaintiffs are left to their proof. 50. 51. As to the allegations of paragraph 50, the plaintiffs are left to their proof. The allegations of paragraph 51 are admitted.

52-59. The allegations of paragraphs 52-59 are denied. 60. As to the allegations of paragraph 60, the plaintiffs are left to their proof.

61-62. The allegations of paragraphs 61-62 are denied. 63. Those allegations of paragraph 63 which allege that the "contract sales price"

was $300,000 are admitted; the remaining allegations of paragraph 63 are denied. 64. Those allegations of paragraph 64 that allege that the lender gave a loan in the

amount of $270,000 are admitted; the remaining allegations of paragraph 64 are denied. 65. The allegations of paragraph 65 are admitted.
-2­
One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103 Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105

Case 3:00-cv-01043-JCH

Document 52

Filed 05/13/2005

Page 3 of 10

66-69. As to the allegations of paragraphs 66-69, the plaintiffs are left to their proof. 70. That portion of paragraph 70 which alleges that Scott Lewis made a false

statement to the court is denied; as to the remaining allegations of paragraph 70, the plaintiffs are left to their proof. 71. 72. As to the allegations of paragraph 71, the plaintiffs are left to their proof. That portion of paragraph 72 which alleges a false statement made by Scott

Lewis is denied; as to the remaining allegations of paragraph 72, the plaintiffs are left to their proof. 73. That portion of paragraph 73 which alleges that the defendants filed a second

action in the New Britain Superior Court is admitted; as to the remaining allegations of paragraph 73, the plaintiffs are left to their proof. 74. Those portions of paragraph 74 which allege that Scott Lewis submitted "false"

affidavits and made "false" statements are denied; as to the remaining portions of paragraph 74, the plaintiffs are left to their proof. 75. Those portions of paragraph 75 which allege false affidavits are denied; as to the

remaining portions of paragraph 75, the plaintiffs are left to their proof. 76-80. As to the allegations of paragraphs 76-80, the plaintiffs are left to their proof. 81. Those portions of paragraph 81 which allege false statements and false affidavits

are denied; as to the remaining allegations of paragraph 81, the plaintiffs are left to their proof. 82. Those portions of paragraph 82 which allege the submission of a "false affidavit"

are denied; as to the remaining allegations of paragraph 82, the plaintiffs are left to their proof.

-3­
One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103 Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105

Case 3:00-cv-01043-JCH

Document 52

Filed 05/13/2005

Page 4 of 10

83.

Those portions of paragraph 83 which allege a false statement are denied; as to

the remaining allegations of paragraph 83, the plaintiffs are left to their proof. 84. Those portions of paragraph 84 which allege a false statement are denied; as to

the remaining allegations of paragraph 84, the plaintiffs are left to their proof. 85. Those portions of paragraph 85 which allege a false statement are denied; as to

the remaining allegations of paragraph 85, the plaintiffs are left to their proof. 86. Those portions of paragraph 86 which allege a false affidavit are denied; as to

the remaining allegations of paragraph 86, the plaintiffs are left to their proof. 87. Those portions of paragraph 87 which allege a false affidavit are denied; as to

the remaining allegations of paragraph 87, the plaintiffs are left to their proof. 88. That portion of paragraph 88 which alleges the filing of a grievance complaint by

Scott Lewis is admitted; the remaining allegations of paragraph 88 are denied. 89. Those portions of paragraph 89 which allege a false charge on behalf of the

defendants are denied; as to the remaining allegations of paragraph 89, the plaintiffs are left to their proof. 90. 91. The allegations of paragraph 90 are admitted. Those portions of paragraph 91 which allege that the charges in the Complaint

are false are denied; as to the remaining allegations of paragraph 91, the plaintiffs are left to their proof. 92. Those portions of paragraph 92 which alleged that the defendant, Scott Lewis,

testified in the presentment hearing are admitted; as to the remaining allegations of paragraph 92, the plaintiffs are left to their proof.
-4­
One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103 Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105

Case 3:00-cv-01043-JCH

Document 52

Filed 05/13/2005

Page 5 of 10

93.

The allegations of paragraph 93 are denied.

94-97. As to the allegations of paragraphs 94-97, the plaintiffs are left to their proof. V. CLAIMS

FIRST CLAIM: RICO, RACKETEERING INFLUENCED CORRUPT ORGANIZATION 98. The responses to paragraphs 1-97 are hereby made answers to paragraph 98 as

if more fully set forth herein. 99. As to the allegations of paragraph 99, the plaintiffs are left to their proof. The allegations of paragraphs 100-102 are denied.

100-102. 103.

To the extent that the allegations in paragraph 103 incorporate and/or reference

the undersigned defendants, and reference them as participating in a scheme, the allegations are denied; otherwise the undersigned defendants do not respond to these allegations as they are not directed toward them. 104. To the extent the allegations of paragraph 104 allege a scheme involving the

undersigned defendants, the allegations are denied; otherwise, the undersigned defendants do not respond to the allegations of paragraph 104 because they are not directed toward them. 105-107. The undersigned defendants do not respond to the allegations in paragraphs 105-107 because they are not directed toward them. B. MR. CLAUDE J. PICARD 108-109. The undersigned defendants do not respond to the allegations in paragraphs 108-109 because they are not directed toward them. 110. To the extent the allegations of paragraph 110 include references to the

undersigned defendants and allege their involvement in a scheme, the allegations are denied;
-5­
One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103 Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105

Case 3:00-cv-01043-JCH

Document 52

Filed 05/13/2005

Page 6 of 10

otherwise, the undersigned defendants do not respond to the allegations of paragraph 110 because they are not directed toward them. 111. To the extent the allegations of paragraph 111 include references to the

undersigned defendants and allege their involvement in a scheme, the allegations are denied; otherwise, the undersigned defendants do not respond to the allegations of paragraph 111 because they are not directed toward them. 112-117. The undersigned defendants do not respond to the allegations of paragraphs of 112-117 because they are not directed toward them. C. SCOTT F. LEWIS 118. Those allegations of paragraph 118 which allege that Scott Lewis prepared the

papers for the second mortgage and promissory note and presented these papers to the plaintiffs are admitted; the remaining allegations of paragraph 118 are denied. 119-128. The allegations of paragraphs 119-128 are denied. D. LEWIS, LEWIS & FERRARO LLC 129-148. The allegations of paragraphs 129-148 are denied. SECOND CLAIM: FDCPA, FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT 149. The responses to paragraphs 1-97 and 102-139 are hereby made answers to

paragraph 149 as if more fully set forth herein. 150. As to the allegations of paragraph 150, the plaintiffs are left to their proof.

151-155. The allegations of paragraphs 151-155 are denied.

-6­
One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103 Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105

Case 3:00-cv-01043-JCH

Document 52

Filed 05/13/2005

Page 7 of 10

THIRD CLAIM: FRAUD 156. The responses to paragraphs 1-97 and 102-139 are hereby made answers to

paragraph 156 as if more fully set forth herein. 157. 158. 159. As to the allegations of paragraph 157, the plaintiffs are left to their proof. The allegations of paragraph 158 are denied. Those portions of paragraph 159 which allege that the defendants obtain court

judgments against the plaintiffs are admitted; the remaining allegations of paragraph 159 are denied. 160-161. The allegations of paragraphs 160-161 are denied. FOURTH CLAIM: INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS 162. The responses to paragraphs 1-97 are hereby made answers to paragraph 162

as if more fully set forth herein. 163. As to the allegations of paragraph 163, the plaintiffs are left to their proof.

164-165. The allegations of paragraphs 164-165 are denied. FIFTH CLAIM: NEGLIGENT INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS 166. The responses to paragraphs 1-97 are hereby made answers to paragraph 166

as if more fully set forth herein. 167. As to the allegations of paragraph 167, the plaintiffs are left to their proof.

168-169. The allegations of paragraph 168-169 are denied. SIXTH CLAIM: TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE WITH BUSINESS EXPECTANCY 170. The responses to paragraphs 1-97 and 102-139 are hereby made answers to

paragraph 170 as if more fully set forth herein.
-7­
One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103 Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105

Case 3:00-cv-01043-JCH

Document 52

Filed 05/13/2005

Page 8 of 10

171. 172. 173.

As to the allegations of paragraph 171, the plaintiffs are left to their proof. The allegations of paragraph 172 are denied. As to the allegations of paragraph 173, the plaintiffs are left to their proof.

174-175. As to the allegations of paragraphs 174-175 are denied. SEVENTH CLAIM: CUTPA, CONNECTICUT UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES ACT 176. The responses to paragraphs 1-97 and 102-139 are hereby made answers to

paragraph 176 as if more fully set forth herein. 177. As to the allegations of paragraph 177, the plaintiffs are left to their proof.

178-179. The allegations of paragraphs 178-179 are denied. 180-181. As to the allegations of paragraphs 180-181, the plaintiffs are left to their proof. 182-183. The allegations of paragraph 182-183 are denied.

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE The claims asserted by the plaintiffs are barred by the applicable statutes of limitations as to each and every count of the complaint. SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE The allegations of the plaintiffs' complaint as to each and every count of the complaint fail to state claims upon which relief can be granted.

-8­
One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103 Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105

Case 3:00-cv-01043-JCH

Document 52

Filed 05/13/2005

Page 9 of 10

THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE The claims asserted by the plaintiffs in each and every count of the complaint are barred by the doctrine of res judicata. FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE The claims of the plaintiffs in each and every count of the complaint are barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel. FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE Some or all of the allegations in each and every count of the complaint are barred by the doctrine of absolute privilege and/or conditional privilege. THE DEFENDANTS, LEWIS, LEWIS & FERRARO, LLC, AND SCOTT F. LEWIS

By

Thomas J. Hagarty, Jr. Fed. Bar. #ct 05259 Laura Pascale Zaino Fed. Bar #ct 19353 HALLORAN & SAGE LLP One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103 (860) 522-6103

-9­
One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103 Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105

Case 3:00-cv-01043-JCH

Document 52

Filed 05/13/2005

Page 10 of 10

CERTIFICATION This is to certify that on this 12th day of May, 2005, I hereby mailed a copy of the foregoing to: Joseph Meaney, Esq. Cranmore, Fitzgerald & Meaney 49 Wethersfield Avenue Hartford, CT 06114-1102 Nitor V. Egbarin and Janet J. Egbarin 28 Ely Place Simsbury, CT 06070 Nitor V. Egbarin and Janet J. Egbarin P.O. Box 230421 Hartford, CT 06123-0421

Thomas J. Hagarty, Jr. Laura Pascale Zaino
683712_1.DOC

- 10 ­
One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103 Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105