Free Order on Motion for Hearing - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 58.4 kB
Pages: 1
Date: March 29, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 412 Words, 2,661 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/9712/116.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Hearing - District Court of Connecticut ( 58.4 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Hearing - District Court of Connecticut
, ‘“ ·1 se 3:00-cv—OO681-RNC Document 116 Filed O3/20/2004 Page 1 of 1 r
· C U at .2 I
rn M
in 0
{ZS ll-l
B UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
gl DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
rn
cn T5
5 E NORMA WATTS, ADMINISTRATRIX OF : CIVIL ACTION NO.
.2 E THE ESTATE OF AQUAN SALMON : 3:00CV068l (DIS)
FU .
B 3 vs. {
GJ ‘ : . .
3 CITY OF HARTFORD; POLICE : _ Q I , _,_,
§ M LC} DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF : j' *·
I § LB 3 HARTFORD; JOSEPH F. CROUGHWELL, ; I
E E ` _ Individually and in his Official Capacity as : I 4 g ..
8 U :>~. Chief of Police ofthe City of Hartford; 1 j —_ g F- _ `·
'_| 2 gw OFFICER ROBERT C. ALLAN, : _ Q L. ~. A-
as FQ {fl Individually and in his Official Capacity : · - ff,
E $· .. jg As a Hanford Police Officer : DECEMBER 23, 2002. ' ;?
G) rl U g
E B . . . 2 PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR HEARING REGARDING THE i
as sr . U ADMISSABILITY OF VIDEO ANIMATION — EXHIBITS 15 AND 16 1
M
, A an
§ U o
fj · na Pursuant to Rule 104 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, the Plaintiff, Norma
M rr. .
rn ru
Q Ei, Watts, through and by her attorneys, Moritz, Cooper & McCann LLP and Cardwell,
U' .
2 t§` E Cardwell & Smoragiewicz, respectfully requests that the court conduct a hearing I
M M E {
U, .3 E regarding the admissibility of the D€f6!1d8.IlI’S exhibits related to the: (1) "Animation {
rd U] O -
fl "" 8 illustrating on a 2-·D level, from overhead, in support of Officer A1lan’s testimony, the
E P
4;] F1 é positions of the vehicles and witnesses during the subject incident" - Exhibits 15; and
Q C: •
`Q E 2 (2) "Animation illustrating on a 3-D level, from the perspective of Officer Allan in
as
cv ‘U M
Q (QQ support of his testimony what he observed during the subject incident" - Exhibit 16, as
[U -I-I -1;%}-
Q; GJ “’ Tdset fortli in the parties’ Joint Trial Memorandum dated December 6, 2002.
° if'‘ >. r _ _
3 J; § ,_ ~i· · “` In support of this motion, the Plaintiff` states as follows:
~·-> —... · if ...4;* I
ai moi is ” ...-,
N Lo if} .-.'r i,°fY;€¤_
·¤ *—’ ··' .. E
§ g ng ifi C ni E
2 5-1 si
MON1z, COOPER 8e McCANN, LLP • ATTORNEYS AT uw
100 ALLYN STREET • HARTFORD, CT 0610:3 • (860) 278-0200 • FAX (BSO) 278-2212 • Junis No. 418370
is-.- _M _.,. .. ._ ._.,_ _ _ _ . _ nfnfnflf
I __ gg i‘f·
.7 .... _ ____r _ i _ __
_. M . . . _ . _ .,_,, _ . . _ n
-”-'