Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:00-cv-00662-CFD Document 59 Filed O3/O3/2004 Pagé wd- MLM L
"""*°`° C) C-
/\ UNITED STATES DISTRICT
DISTRICT OF CONNECT lil., M
[K C .. ...
ZORAIDA SANTIAGO : CWISBACIBION
Pl¤i¤¢w’ * 3¤°‘l?Y(°ll?9’y€¥il€[?)t:tiutzt
1 Still?}. Cul., l
v. : " l
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL U
SERVICES, ET AL. :
Defendants : FEBRUARY ll, 2004
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER
COMES NOW the Defendants, Department of Social Services, Patricia Wilson-Coker
,6 .
ié B` and Dennis, King, and hereby respectfully request, pursuant to Local Rule 7, an enlargement of
T3 ‘¤6
E gj 3 time of forty-five (45) days until March 27, 2004 to file a motion for summary judgment. The
· wil
gg; :1 defendants, through counsel, represent the following:
hd IM
F3
pi, Q l. The parties are pursuing settlement negotiations.
l2` A U &° *~~
`l:¤® cb Defendants’ counsel has another deadline of March 18 fora responsive pleading '
is v Cf " °*’€;“’
i1;II*islE_éi:),..v3 Helt and Doyle, 3:03C\/02183 (RNC) and a deadline of April 15 for summary
j *’ nr} -.`.ig2° ·Z`
` I umn .'dg1'I{éT}°t*...lIH Lewis v. DOC, 3:02CV 2304 (MRK) among numerous other deadlines and
` Lg 5i*L“‘ T
;=’§>b11Qgg£;c5aS. ,
h A 3. Further research on novel issues of law is required to prepare for summary Y
judgment.
4. This is the defendants’ fourth request to Modify the Scheduling Order. `
5. The undersigned left a message for Attorney Marc Glenn on Feb. ll, 2004, as to
whether he has an objection to this requested extension, but has not heard back from him. The
. 1 /