Free Status Report - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:00-cv—0066C5iNC Document 34 Filed 12/0g§003 Page 1 of 4
`4‘' 4» aaa ,
I
I CII} '>.I:‘ ~ .I
I l fl 3 I_,,_I_ Is.) I:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT U I-"lI.* I
I "· UI" · I
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT I
I I
DOLORES ROBINSON :
I VS. NO. 3:00CV661(RNC)
I MELVIN WEARING, ET AL. DECEMBER 1, 2003
PARTIES' RULE 16IcI REPORT
Counsel for the parties having conferred, the following report is submitted
to the court in connection with the Pretrial Conference in this matter.
I. FORMULATION AND SIMPLIFICATION OF THE ISSUES I
Not applicable. I
II. NECESSITY OR DESIRABILITY OF AMENDMENTS TO THE
PLEADINGS I
Not necessary.
I
III. POSSIBILITY OF OBTAINING ADMISSIONS OF FACT AND OF *
DOCUMENTS TO AVOID UNNECESSARY PROOF, STIPULATIONS
REGARDING AUTHENTICITY OF DOCUMENTS, AND ADVANCE I
RULINGS FROM THE COURT ON THE ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE I
Counsel will discuss this. I
I

4 Case 3:00-cV—OO66R-BKNC Document 34 Filed 12/O2/2003 Page 2 of 4 4
4 I ¤- O i
` 4
t 4
4 4
I 4
I IV. AVOIDANCE OF UNNECESSARY PROOF AND OF CUMULATIVE ~
4 EVIDENCE, AND LIMITATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE OF 4
4 TESTIMONY UNDER RULE 702, F.R.EV. I
4 Counsel are discussing the possibility of reducing the number of
4 witnesses and exhibits. 4
4
V. APPROPRIATENESS AND TIMINO OF SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 4
Not applicable. 4
VI. CONTROL AND SCHEDULING OF DISCOVERY 4
Not applicable.
VII. IDENTIFICATION OF WITNESSES AND DOCUMENTS, THE NEED
AND SCHEDULE FOR FILING AND EXCHANGING PRETRIAL BRIEFS,
AND THE DATE OR DATES FOR FURTHER CONFERENCES AND FOR I
TRIAL ¤
The Joint Trial Memorandum has been filed. N
4
VIII ADVISABILITY OF REFERRINO MATTERS TO A MAOISTRATE JUDGE 4
OR MASTER
I I
No settlement is likely in this case.
lx. SETTLEMENT AND USE OF SPECIAL PROCEDURES TO ASSIST IN
. RESOLVINO THE DISPUTE
The plaintiff will submit another demand to the defendants, but settlement 4
is highly unlikely.
4
4
4

4
_ . Case 3:00-cv—OO66(;RNC Document 34 Filed 12/O@OO3 Page 3 of 4 I
I
4 4
E 4
4 4
X. FORM AND SUBSTANCE OF THE PRETRIAL ORDER
The current order Is satisfactory.
I ` I
4 XI. DISPOSITION OF PENDING MOTIONS N
i None. W
XII NEED FOR ADOPTING SPECIAL PROCEDURES FOR MANAGING
POTENTIALLY DIFFICULT OR PROTRACTED ACTIONS I
Not applicable.
XIII ORDER FOR SEPARATE TRIALS
Not applicable. N
U XIV ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO PRESENT EVIDENCE EARLY IN `
THE TRIAL WITH RESPECT TO A MANAGEABLE ISSUE THAT COULD I
BE THE BASIS FOR A JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW i
Not applicable.
l I
XV ORDER ESTABLISHING A REASONABLE LIMIT ON THE TIME
ALLOWED FOR PRESENTING EVIDENCE 5
4
Not applicable.
XVI SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS MAY FACILITATE THE JUST, SPEEDY,
AND INEXPENSIVE DISPOSITION OF THE ACTION I
None at this time.

4 y
4 , , . Case 3:00-cv—OO66ti;F)NC Document 34 Filed 12/O(27`%OO3 Page 4 of 4
, 4
4 4
4 j
4
` 4
4 THE i=>LAiNTu=r=
4 • · R. witurwis (cw ,
4 1 Elm street
New Haven, CT 06510 4
4 203/562-9931
mx; 202/7%-9494 y
E—iV|aiI: jrw@johnrwi||iams.c0m 4
Her Attorney

cERTu=icATio1v or sERvici=.:
On the date above stated, a copy hereof was mailed to
iviART1r~1 ECHTER
Deputy Corporation Counsel
165 Church Street j
New |·|§\Eil·~CT·0651 0 ‘ ‘
_/»
/_r¤"f @!”Ms 4
4
4
4
4