Free Jury Verdict - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

' ' Case 3:00-cv-00656-SRU Document 131 Filed O2/16/2005 Page 1 of 2 V
®®€3!@ mr¤r E
m@M ‘=t~:-:t.·•z•:¢.· _;l.· -=- .
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT g I
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT I6
*_,;.'~·;p`•_ ,_Zi_i ._,·;
_ .. ..~. ._, ` _ ,2, _ , .
MARSHALL CHAMBERS, . it ~ I
Piainuri; ; [
: CIVIL ACTION NO.
v. : O3:OOcv656 (SRU)
R. JAMES NICHOLSON,
SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, 1
Defendant. : l
VERDICT FORM I
We, the jury, unanimously find as follows: L
1. Did the plaintiff] Marshall Chambers, prove by a preponderance ofthe evidence that the
defendant’s decision not to upgrade Mr. Chambers’ position from a GS-6 to a GS-7
violated Title VII'? q
l
Yes No X U
Please proceed to question 2. I
2. Did the plaintiff; Marshall Chambers, prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the
det`endant’s decision to change Mr. Chambers’ job from Secretary to Program Clerk ,
violated Title VII?
Yes No X l
U you answered Y es to either question 1 or question 2, please proceed to question 3.
H you answered No to both question 1 and question 2, your deliberations are complete;
please sign and date the verdictforrn.

I




Case 3:00-cv-00656-SRU Document 131 Filed O2/16/2005 Page 2 of 2 {
I
3. Did the plaintiff; Marshall Chambers, prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he is
entitled to compensatory damages?
Yes No
I
If yes, what amount of compensatory damages do you award him?
I S
If no, what amount of nominal damages do you award him?
$—»»—~— I
Please sign and dare this verdict form. I
` U
J [ /6 [asf
Foreperson D3.lZ€
I