Free Memorandum in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:00-cv—00820-PCD Document 89-15 Filed 06/30/2005 Page 1 of 4
EXHIBIT 10 ‘

_u;§;E,LLw}:gf':v_r_a__` , ,4. J,&_&"__;" I _ . .,..,,._. ..-1 A l` _A` ··. ’· 1-,;, > I -¢l···¤¤P1I\$LJ II I I =r' _l3C ` » ’ pv-,
Ce¤s*e¤:3izO?—’evi0082GeP§E) _ D8éug]§*nt 8‘§-{513 ° Wed 06/@0/2®I)5¤¤MQ?a !e¤2mf _ ·»·;.. NU·...
*"?***;.» ` I ‘2::?
I IIZQSV-t2_ pz? eax; Ie |31.I Y? I 3 eau It I I I nf tau;
_ ~I·,· I » , I V- rw/5 I _I
' I PLA¤N—T=F¤=S ezeeee mee; ¤EFEN¤ANTS@3;,g5gID —
I pggggggw TRIBE I Ii A QGBENECTICBT I'?/=§é’ ”;"I
I ISGLZDATED H77—i;35 I " ` `
{muse I ` "
25 USC 3.,79 U._S. Const., Att. E Sec. 3 I A
Return of Indian tribal iende conveyed since 1790 without federal consent.
r ., I I
......._..__._.___..-....- , _. . , jI’ A§Ig?·?;f·I>i({j;/G
_- “ . Atmicirmevs _ " W ‘ `
Jerome Grine: l ° r" ‘‘‘‘ " - ,- II
¤'#0’fC#%fa’n’d’¤S’0’¤2’e’e€¤’ #37 Em St. V geist, tty Genet-e1 I
H·3IIf*?C§?’:d,C'i', E;§~§¤nr`5e13ta1 Ftetecticn
527-52% ` ` Oé/D7 _P.0. §_cx 1 ’ A
=’ _ H Eex·tfe&·_ ,Ct 6].01 Q; I `
Jchn R. -Wj.].lj.B.I[1S.»‘ te]., 5§>6s209 %etwieI.ZSc"1£1efe
¥ EI7®€7A'J%/ withdraw?
/Q/7h@ J I Francis J. MacQ1:egm:· if/I
I New H§g<;né9g!'§‘. , 06510 I ‘ Assistant etty. Gen.,,§§’;eI?y'¤;"@
E " 1 If' Q 45 . J
Z I - Hertford, Conn. &6{—1A0é/Ové
5R¤b@It B,. Cohen I _
sf ? . v_ __ Séf/—*/$@0 I I
I jmIg—;~~··»P~;C. ‘_ I _; . _ I _ A X
a Rosemem, I Iemzeue tstztieeg
I e¤‘S‘I*§r¢* Atty 3.
° + I L . I I /
1 "mj""\ ‘ , zltjter et Geiéeyel
·;?>&> 3 flllain 8 "?‘» 6 I _ éweisstag/?Iiei?se~4’ @@,5
A/%»QI‘ Oé/A . , I I I 1 I
L · r- _ ... .1.;..j _,__
I _ ‘ Leslieji. @212 _ _
M A US.Atty. - " ‘
_ I 1 gpc ;;»>,(_;
J CHECK FILING FEES PAID - _/J’f'i I . STATISTICAL CARDS
I CASIEEVZIIES DATE . RecEu>T—NuMB»ER I I °c,¤,NuMaER ` CARD DATE WM ED
mm _ Isa
WA r-
`FWQTATFR¤i£T¤1nT;Etx||RT¤GC§(ET N I ` ` I A M · [`$!`-7»1"!

I
l ‘ , Case 3:00-cv—00820-PCD Document 89-15 Filed 06/30/2005 Page3of4
:111A 4
` ev._1/75) . V
p CHHLDOCKETCONUNUAUONSHEET
NT] DEFENDANT `
FF r NOH77—<»3¢»
MOHEGAN TRIBE STATE OF CONNECTICUT PAGE22-OF-4-PAGES
DATE NR. Pnocssmmss »

.L989 `
HV 16 87 RESPONSE to reply dated 6/13/89 for sanctions, etc. (under sealed) -
JN 26 488 SUPPLEMENT #1 to response of Atty. Griner dated 6/15/89, as to procedure by whic·
Tribal membership & representation is to be determined ·
; JN 27 489 SUPPLEM NT #1 to response to reply to motion for sanctions, etc.
{ IUN 28 490 MOTION re Atty. Griner's order re motion for sanctions/referral to grievance
· co mittee under seal
$ JUN 28 491 MOTION for enlargement of time to respond to atty. Griner{s statement of fact Jl
l l issues, to indicate further factual issues (including witnesses & exhibits) &·
Q to provide further materials regarding disputed individuals' status in the tribe
man 7/27/89 I ‘ l
g UN 29 492 RESPONSE to communication of atty. Griner dated 6/26/89
Q UN 29 493 RESPONSE of ata?. Griner to Mr. Cohen's agree/disagree commeqts
§IL 5 END on dckt #4 1 GRANTED. Atty. Cohen shall compE§ on or e ore -4
§ 7/27/89. Dorsey, J. copies mailed
§IL 27 494 COMPLIANCE by atty. Robert B. Cohen with sec. 3 of the order of tha
{ court dated 5/18/89
§ IL 28 95 LETTER dated 7/26/89 to PCD ncom atty Cohen (filed under sealed)
i UG 3 96 SUMMARY of issues & facts re: representation of pltf. Mohegan.Tribe h
§>CT 24 497 STATEMENT of the Mohegan Tribe with re ard to the lands claimed i·
Q · the amendment to the complaint dated 11710/78
E 3T 27 498 REPUDIATION by pltfs.Mohegan Tribe of the false, misleading &
§ statements of atty. Robert B. Cohen in his statement (allegedly .,,
p of Mohegan Tribe) with regard to lands claimed, dated 10/24/89 ·
§ OV 15 499 MOTION to Strike & for Sanctions _
g OV 15 500 MEMO of law in support of motion to Strike & for Sanctions
jIOV 21 501 OBJECTION to motion to strike & for sanctions dated 11/15/89 by pl f
i L990 ‘ · _ .
i xPR 9 502 ORDER OF REFERENCE TO U.S. MAG. SMITH (settlement negotiations to
ép g the conclusion of the case) — Dorsey, J. copies mailed
§,AY 29 503 MOTION for permission to w/d appearance of Dennis Cavanaugh for pl f
i AY 30 504 MOTION for permission tp w/d appearance of Earl Phillips for pltf.
g AY 25 SETTLEMENT CONF, HELD BEFORE TPS — new date to be set up in June
p for further talks "
p.Y 30 END on dckt #503 — GRANTED. Dorsey, J.~ copies mailed
AY 31 505 MOTION for permission to w/d appearance of John F. Droney, Jr. for
· pltf. · _
{AY 31 END on dckt #504 — GRANTED. Dorsey, J. copies mailed
_ [AY 31 END on dckt #505 — GRANTED. Dorsey, J. copies mailed
ESIUN 6 506 OBJECTION to claims for 700,000 acres & other amonuts & relief in
fc atty Cohen‘s statement of 10/24/89
c IN 6 507 OBJECTION to implied claim for attys fees by defs.
IN 14 508 MOTION for leave to conduct supplemental discovery for a disclosur
{ schedule, & for modification of the stay for these purposes 1

. ‘ 1Case 3:00-cv—00820-PCD Document 89-15 Filed 06/30/2005 Page4of%4
: 111A · _ ` `
. ev. 1/75) ` ‘
CHHLDOCKETCONNNUAUONSHEET
PLAHWUFF DEFENDANT . »
_ DOCKETNOH1Z;jEg£.
MOHEGAN TRIBE STATE OF CONN. PAGE23 OF PAGES 1
‘ DATE ¤ Pnocssomos
, I I I
i UN 14 509 MEMO in support of motion for leave to conduct supplemental discov-r
` for a disclosure schedule, & for modification of the stay for these •i
UN 21 510 PLTF'S objection to def's motion for leave to conduct supplemental
discovery, for a disclosure schedule, E formodification of the Stay
for these purposes dated 6/14/90
A UN 21 511 PLTF'S memo of law in opposition to def's motion for leave to cond c·
E supplemental discovery, for a disclosure schedule, & for modificati•n
E of the stay for these purposes
?'UN 25 512 DEF'S response to pltf's memo of 6/19/90 re supplemental discover l
é JN 28 513 PLTF'S reply to def's response dated 6/25/90 supplemental discover~
y UL 3 514 MEMO in opposition to motion for leave to conduct supplemental disc
p UL 10 515 DEF'S response to pltf's memo of 7/3/90, & letter of 7/5/90, opposfn¢
é V discovery v `
y UL 10 516 AFFIDAVIT pursuant to local rule 9(d)4
s JL 10 END on dckt #508 — GRANTED in part. Pltf. shall produce a copy of tl
E submission conincidental with the filing of same with the Bureau of
I. _ Indian Affairs. The process by which the Bureau will receive & con.i»
Q submissions by interested parties is a matter that is internal to t e
Q _ Bureau. Dorsey, J. copies mailed
Q‘UL 20 517 MOTION for reconsideration & motion to modify scheduling order pu·s
S to rule l6(b), FRCP by defs. .
Q IUL 23 518 MOTION for reconsideration & motion to modify scheduling order
j IUL 23 519 REQUEST for Oral Aggument by defs.
A UL 25 520 .PLTF'S objection to def's motion for reconsideration & motion to ·od
3 dated 7/20/90 . _
§ UG 2 ’END on dckt #518 — DENIED as not raising grounds not previously
‘ considered. Drosey, J. copies mailed ‘
; /21 521 CIPY of letter dated 8/17/90 to Secretary of Interior frtn1Atty. Schaefer, filed
,/21 SZ! LmTHl&Re1&0@@0toPGJ&xmAUy.Sdm@kr,fUed t
i·R 1 523 LETTER dated 3/18/91 to TPS from atty Cohen
i R 1 524 LETTER dated 3/25/91 to TPS from atty. Griner fld.
EIT 1 . _
2 8. 525 ORDER RE PENDING MOTIONS — to Strike & for Sanctions fld. ll/15/89 ha:
been stayed pending an agency decision ..... Dorsey, J. copies mail=d
i~~.—..;.'__Q_,` " " " I .. __ A
*3* ::; Seeefecfr ' · — —- . - -`-` 4
KK; L; r omc Hocfief sheei for all fufure §nfri@
If" .• C‘ ‘
len ae/).er>