Free Order on Motion to Continue - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I , ase 3:00-cv-00740-CFD Document 77 Filed O1/13/2O%}7,[fZ‘a’ //’/“.Z.?}¤‘$L I
— -7% o Ig
‘ I
I I '7``. 3 S · I1--I
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I I I It I
QI If j‘_` IQ ·»ee _ ,
I msrmcr or coNNEcr1cUT ‘ " II ·II‘· I I· I —
‘ ?`L"I` $1:-2;; I
·—~· UII"` _
THOMAS SANDERS : CIVIL ACTION NO: . -·e‘ ' I
Plaintiff : 3:00CV00740 (CFD)
V. I
. II ’ .
PHILIP LaFLEIJR, GERALD HINES, :
MICHAEL GLIDVER AND JOHN :
X ARMSTRONG : December 22, 2003
w Defendants : I
Q Q 2 I
\ MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL READINESS ‘
¤ AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE I
I 1) On December 15, 2003, the undersigned received the court’s order scheduling an
A; I ppearance on J ahuary 9, 2004 at 11:00 a.m. to discuss trial readiness and other pretrial issues.
'Q
3 2) For some months the undersigned has been scheduled to commence trial on January 8,
\ I I @4 in the mattetr of Cortes-Barrios, et al v. Penn which trial would undoubtedly carry over into
( Enuaiy 9, 2004.
3 I ¤. 3) Althouh there is reasonable likelihood that the aforementioned Cortes-Barrios, et al I
g- ~ .
Q \ I In Penn case may settle prior to the trial date, there is no guarantee this will occur. In the event I
I I ` FO ppg; I
Q Q M se dB°Es n the Superior Court expects the undersigned to commence trial as
I pg _ . I di*esa1d.m E13 VL? I
I I '"‘ iii I
I me I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
- __ - gi - ;_ - __ .... .
. Qi _ __ _ I __ I 4* I i I I I