Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

lf 1 I ... lll
_ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I“'`
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT P uz O O
uu ucl M
WILLIAM G. CLARK, ) _ __ my
Piaintirrx ) CIVIL cg"`
Counterclaim Defendant, ) PW 5 ‘“ MM ° ` `
)
v. ) No. 300CV07ll (RNC)
)
LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY )
COMPANY, )
Defendant/ )
~ Counterclaim Plaintiff ) OCTOBER 14, 2004
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF THE
, DEADLINE SET FORTH IN THE JUNE 14, 2004 ORDER
Pursuant to Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 9(b),
plaintiff William G. Clark respectfully moves the Court to extend the deadline set forth in the
Court’s June 14, 2004 Order by one month, up to and including November 15, 2004. In support
of this Motion, Mr. Clark represents as follows:
1. On May 17, 2004, the parties notified the Court that a settlement had been
reached, but that a certain amount of time was needed to finalize and execute the settlement. p
2. As a result of such representation, on June 14, 2004, the Court ordered the Clerk
"to close the file for administrative purposes without prejudice to reopening on or before October
15 , 2004.” In addition, the Court ordered that the parties could file a stipulation of dismissal
I October 15 Clark v. Lgmggggmggg Mg; . gag, gg ,
.. $5,,.; 3 : OOCVO0711 (RNC)
A ·—`.,__ C-QQ, (W)
Re ; ggpintzifff me {Mot ion for Extension of the Deadline Set Forth in the June
2 O@»4 (Doc . # 144)
Grantgi $5;*, oxtgljgjfed .
. C3 a;i;J‘·
\ Ro%1:t kN. Chatigny, U.?.DPJ. U