Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:00-cv-00705-CFD

Document 89

Filed 02/11/2004

Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ) ) ) ) Master File No. 3:00CV705(CFD) ) ) FEBRUARY 11, 2004

In re: PE Corporation Securities Litigation

MOTION ON CONSENT FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFFS' REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO CLASS CERTIFICATION Lead plaintiffs David Berlin and Vinh Vuong ("Lead Plaintiffs"), through their undersigned counsel, hereby move on consent pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b) for a 3-day extension of time, through and including, February 17, 2004, to file their Reply in further support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification. In support of this motion, Lead Plaintiffs represent: 1. Lead Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Class Certification ("Lead Plaintiffs' Motion")

on July 18, 2003. 2. Defendants completed class discovery on November 11, 2003, and, subsequently,

filed their Opposition to Lead Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification on December 29, 2003. 3. Pursuant to the parties' Joint Motion For Extension of Discovery Schedule, filed

September 30, 2003, and granted by this Court on October 9, 2003, Lead Plaintiffs' Reply in further support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification is due tomorrow, Thursday, February 12, 2004. Additional time is required in order to adequately address the arguments raised in Defendants' Opposition brief. 4. Pursuant to Local Rule 7(b), counsel for Lead Plaintiffs has inquired of counsel

for defendants, who have consented to the relief requested. 5. This is the first request for extension of time to file Lead Plaintiffs' reply brief

following the filing of Defendants' Opposition to Lead Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification.

Case 3:00-cv-00705-CFD

Document 89

Filed 02/11/2004

Page 2 of 3

Wherefore, Lead Plaintiffs request an extension of three (3) days, through and including February 17, 2004, to reply to defendants' opposition.

Respectfully submitted,

By:_______________________________ J. Daniel Sagarin (CT04289) David A. Slossberg (CT13116) Brian C. Fournier (CT16272) HURWITZ & SAGARIN, LLC 147 N. Broad Street, P.O. Box 112 Milford, Connecticut 06460 (203) 877 - 8000 Liaison Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs Sanford P. Dumain (CT08138) Carlos F. Ramirez (CT25340) MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD HYNES & LERACH LLP One Pennsylvania Plaza 49th Floor New York, New York 10119 (212) 594-5300 Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs

2

Case 3:00-cv-00705-CFD

Document 89

Filed 02/11/2004

Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATION This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing was served on February 11, 2004, by facsimile and FedEx, postage prepaid, to the following: Stanley A. Twardy, Jr. Thomas D. Goldberg Terence J. Gallagher Day, Berry & Howard LLP One Canterbury Green Stamford, CT 06901 Liaison Counsel Michael J. Chepiga William M. Regan Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP 425 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10017

Counsel for Defendants

______________________________ Brian C. Fournier

3