Free Motion to Compel - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

j M-
_
y : 49% Cmmml Case. !\}c¤l\e,eL

l“"**··~·——-————— wi __ _ J
4!E$WE?»1GS%’€..!. J
[ I bé§}DI I C T I
` ` M ¤
i
;
{L {5 . QW lA!.4¥}§l!A\! ¤
JE I J

I I
I Case 3:00-cv-00435-J-CH., DOCUYUQFII 146 __ FIIQO of xg -. I nlnln U I
I _. ' II
I In I e . I
I
I _ , I
I " . *:'·IS?”I>§5K I
I I . UNITED STATES DISTRICT COIJRTICIIIIIIL-‘;§r_r_I C;QIg;_q,, I
I ‘ - I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BEC /2 I ’ -· {
I . [SLI IUU I
I DANTE DELORETO, ET AL : CIVIL ACTIO .. 3s00,CV435 SR ·
I Plaintiff ; ij LI ( UI I
I _ I
I V. g I
OFFICER WHIPPLE, ET AL. I
Defendants. : DECEMBER ll, 2000
MOTION TO MODIFY CASE CAPTION I
The plaintiffs, by and through counsel, Jon L. Schoenhom, move this court, pursuant to
§ Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 7, 10, 17 and 25, to modify the caption of this case to reflect the
§ substitution of parties in interest and the dismissal of certain original defendants. In lieu of I I · I
captioning this case Dante DeLoreto, et al. v. Officer Whipple, or Dante DeLoreto v. Karangelis,
it should now reflect the caption "DeLoreto, et al v. Thomas Mitney, et al." I
In support hereof] the plaintiff states that on or about October 18, 2000, the court granted I
% his motion to amend the complaint, by substituting certain named defendants, including the first-
named defendant and that the granting of this motion will avoid unnecessary confusion. -
I I
THE PLAINTIFFS, I
_ ` ’ DANTE DELORETO, ET AL
I . I I
4 EI: Q I · I
E _ ’ l wi l x
I O ` By
I _1l·· · - N
__. , ._-. __ A on L. Sch enhorn
I 7-* ` Attorne
I I . IS Y
·° 'S- ‘"`”‘ 97 oak stmt
f r-_ Hartford, CT 06106 I
I If· Telephone No. (860) 278-3500
Fed Bar No.: ct00l19
{AQ e I I
5 I I
' I

Q , Cyasé 3:00-cv-00435-JCH D0cument146 Filed O3/1E%
; C ~
: i
¤·r. r~»»£ I 1
` `""`"""""""`“—""‘*""‘*
:
Y>~— .»-
S M * A lbum,. fg!. ,
mae é\ __;
T X _ .- J- 5»...v4',· U